آديسين ادب آهي اکڙين ۾
{aridoc engine=”pdfjs” width=”570″ height=”600″}images/Doc/New_Books/آديسين_ادب_آهي_اکڙين_۾_ڊجيٽل_ايڊيشن_فائينل_پروف31.pdf{/aridoc}
آديسين ادب آهي اکڙين ۾
{aridoc engine=”pdfjs” width=”570″ height=”600″}images/Doc/New_Books/آديسين_ادب_آهي_اکڙين_۾_ڊجيٽل_ايڊيشن_فائينل_پروف31.pdf{/aridoc}
معهاگ مضمون ۽ مقالا
{aridoc engine=”pdfjs” width=”570″ height=”600″}images/Doc/New_Books/معهاگ_مضمون_۽_مقالا.pdf{/aridoc}
We believe in hypothesis and compile history on the basis oforal and one-sided sources. We are not interested in hunting for more sourcesand applying research methodology. Pir Pagaro and his followers are in positionto afford collection of source material on an outstanding Freedom Fighter-Soreh Badshah. There is need of establishing ‘Pagara Historical ResearchInstitute’ on purely scientific and research methods and esure it to work underany Research Scholars and not to be run by their followers & mureeds. Inthe research methodology, first of all all the source material is to becollected and preserved. This source-material will later on pave way forextensive research on the subject.
While collecting source-material on Sindh History, I came acrossa correspodance between Sindh Governor (H.Dow) and the Viceroy of India (LordLinlithgow) on and about two Pirs of Sindh- Pir of Bharchundi and Pir ofPagaro. The letter has been written by the Sindh Governor on 19th April1941. I am reproducing here to share with my fb friends.
The Governor writes:
1. This letter concerns the Pir of Bharchundi, andwill dispose of item 4 of the outstanding matters mentioned in your letter of 1st April.
2. There is now general agreement on the part of myMinistry, the Chief Secretary and the district officers that the Pir of may besafely released, and I should like to give effect to this with as little delayas possible. The release would would be uncondional, but Pir would be given tounderstand that his influence with his followers is expected to be sufficientto restrain them from grave crimes, and that any recrudescence of the recentdisorders would result in his reincarceration.
3. This release should take place at once becauseof the possiblity that it may very soon become necessary to put the Pir Pagarounder restraint, and it is undesirable to give any pretext for themisrepresentation that a campaign against Pirs in general is being waged. I do not thinkGrahm has referred to the Pir Pagaro, in his fortnightly letters to you, since25th September, an earlier anf fuller reference being in paragraph15 of his letter of 13th July.
4. The murids of the Pir Pagaro are a fanaticalsect known as the HURS, who have a long and sinister history in Sindh. In theearly years of this century it took a regular military expedition to round upthe Hurs from their strongholds in jungles of the Thar Parkar district, andlarge numbers of them were either deported and imprisoned at Visapur in BombayPresidency or kept within stockaded settlements in Sindh; and there has been nolong period during which it has been possible to avoid keeping the Pir undersome measure of restraint either by restricting his movements on tour or byactually keeping him in confinement. This basic cause of the criminal habits ofthe Hurs is their devotion to the Pir; they are constantly beggaring themselvesby giving him their whole property, so that after a visit from the Pir theyhave no other means of livelihood than by theft and violence.
5. The present Pir Pagaro was released from jail on25th November 1936. Grahm (The then Governor,Sindh) was for a longtime unwilling to believe that the complaints associating him with seriouscrimes in Sindh were justified, but he has left me notes which indicate thathis belief in the Pir’s harmlessness was much shaken, and that action mightsoon have to be taken against him. The possition now reached is that theDistrict Magistrates of all neighbouring districts and also the Administraor ofKhairpur State consider that a situation of grave danger is arising; and Ridley(District Magistrate, Sukkur) is preparing a full statement of the case foraction against the Pir.
6. The position of my Ministers is a difficult onebecause of the Pir’s political associations. He is hostile to the Muslim Leaguewho are making use of rival pirs and mullas in their propeganda in thedistricts. The Pir Pagarohas also been recently reported to be bidding forCongress sympathy, even to the extent of taking to the ‘Charkha’ himself, andenjoying its use on his followers. The Home Minister, Sir Ghulam HussainHidayatullah, for whatever reasons- and some not very creditable once arealleged- is his staunch supporter in the cabinet, and the Premier is naturallynot anxious to take action against the enemy of his enemies.
7. For the present, I have contanted myself withindicating to the Home Minister that I expect Ridley’s report to be dealt withexpeditiosly when it is received, and that I should require very strong reasonto be adduced if it were proposed to reject the practically unanimous advice ofso many district officers. I hope the matter will be satisfactorilly solvedwithout my having recourse to my special responsibilities, which I sould not inso grave a matter have any hesitation in invoking should it appear to me to benecessary.
8. I should be gratful to receive your very earlypermission to release the Bharchundi Pir.
Your sicerely,
H.Dow
Pakistan Resolution By Sindh Assembly
Research by Renowned Historian
&
Founder of Gul Hayat Institute
Khair Muhammad Arija
DATED: 28/11/2011
29th of November
BIRTHS:
Haresh Thakur (Mombai/Stage/ 1950), Abdul Sami Kandhar ( Ghulam Hussain Kandhar/ Literature/1972).
DEATHS:
Allahdad ‘Soofi’ ( Literature/1882), Parmanand Mewaram (Hyderabad/ Journalism/1938 )
… Moulvi Muhammad Ismail Odi (Religious Scholar /Freedom Fighter/1970),
Mofti Karim Bux (Sobho Magsi/ Religious Scholar/2006)
http://www.gulhayat.com/
DATED: 29/11/2011
EVENTS EROM UN-TOLD HISTORY OF SINDH- 29th November.
1922: The editor of daily Al- Waheed, Karachi , faces case in the Court of City Magistrat, under CPC 108 (1) .Editors of this paper, prior to this had been give time as under:
1. On 27.1O.1920, under Section 500 (1) of IPC.
2. On 4.1.1921, under Section 153 & A-124 IPC.
3. On 2.2.1921, under Press Act of 1910.
1922: Public Meetings are arranged by local branches of the Sindh Khilafat Committee at Buthi, Nasarpur, Dargah Thulah, Unarpur, Matiari, Amrote and Wasi Malook Shah. 1926: Hyderabad District Congress Committee through resolution passed in meeting, thanks people for electing Mr. jairamdas Doulatram as the member of the Bombay Legislative Council.
Dr.Pathan http://www.gulhayat.com/
Dated: 30-11-2011.
Dated: 01-12-2011
Dated: 02-12-2011
ٽيئن آرڪيالاجي ڪانفرنس ماٿيلوصدين کان جي موضوع تي لکيل مقالو
ماٿيلومومل جي ماڙيءَ جي حوالي سان منتظمن ۽ محققن کي ڪي گذارشون ۽ صلاحون.
محقق؛ڊاڪٽر در محمد پٺاڻ
هيءَ مون لاءِ اعزاز جي ڳالهه آهي ته مومل جي مزاج ۽ مجاز جي وارثن، اڄ ان جي هنڌ کي ڏسڻ جو موقعو فراهم ڪيوآهي، جنهن سنڌي عورت جي ڏاهپ، ڏات ۽ وفاداري جي لازوال حقيقت کي تاريخ جو سنهري باب بڻائي ڇڏيو. پر اسان انهي سچي واقعي کي ۽ حقيقت کي قصو بڻائي ڇڏيو. جڏهن ته تاريخ نويس پنهنجا قلم پاسيرا ڪري رکندا آهن ته حقيقتون قصن ۽ ڪهاڻين جو جنم وٺنديون آهن.
”ماٿيلو مومل جي ماڙي“ ۽ ان سان لاڳاپيل قصو، آثارِ قديمه جي عالمن ۽ تاريخ نويس محققن جو موضوع آهي. پر اسان جي علم ۽ قلمي پورهيي سان ڀريل ورق، پاڻ کي ماهرن ۽ محققن جي ڪم جي معيار ۽ مقدار تي مطمعن ڪرڻ واري موٽ نه ٿا ڏين.
مون کي جڏهن سائين اختر علي شاهه بخاري ۽ محترم الطاف اثيم جو حڪم مليو ته هن ثقافتي ۽ علمي ڪاڄ ۾ مون کي به ويچار ونڊڻان آهن ته مون ڪتابن جا ورق ورائڻ شروع ڪيا. مون کي هن کان اڳ ٿيل ڪم تي مايوسي به ئي ته پريشاني به ٿي. مومل جي ماڙي ۽ مومل تي، مون سمجهيوهو ته ايترو قلمي پورهيو ٿيو هوندو جو مان ان تي مشتمل بيبلو گرافي ٺاهي، وڃي ڪانفرنس ۾ سنگت کي صلاح ڏيندس ته بيبلو گرافي کي پراجيڪٽ طور کڻي دوست ڪم ڪن.منهنجي راءِ ۽ صلاح اها ئي رهندي ته ماٿيلو،مومل ۽ مل جي ماڙي جي موضوع تي بيبلو گرافيص تي ڪم ٿيڻ گهرجي. هن کان اڳ موضوع تي جيڪي ڪتاب ۽ مضمون منهنجي نظر مان گذريا آهن، انهن کي مون ضميمي نمبر1 طور پنهنجي هن مختصر مقالي ۾ شامل ڪيو آهي، جيڪو ڇهن ورقن تي شامل آهي . آرڪيالاجي ، تاريخ جي انهي دور تي روشني وجهندي آهي ، جنهن جي ٻِي ڪا شاهدي ثابتي موجود نه هوندي آهي. مومل ۽ مومل جي ماڙي ، اسان جي ماضي قريب سان واسطو رکن ٿا. ان ڪري آثار قديم جي عالمن کي تاريخي رڪارڊ جو معلوماتي ذريعو به ميسر آهي. پوءِ مومل ۽ مومل جي ماڙي اسان لاءِ منجهيل سٽ نه هئڻ گهرجي. پر اسان ان کي منجهيل سٽ جو روپ پاڻ ڏيئي رهيا آهيون.
مثال طور ڪن دوستن جو خيال آهي ته هي اها مومل جي ماڙي ناهي، جتان نيم تاريخي رومانوي داستان ” مومل راڻي“جنم ورتو. سندن انومان هي آهي ته مومل ۽ راڻي جي قصي جي جاگرافي جا اهڃاڻ لاڙ ۽ جيسلمير طرف آهن،ان ڪري نه مومل هتان جي ۽ نه وري مومل جي ماڙي انهي مومل جي . ڪن دوستن جي چواڻي ته ” نند ڪوٽ “ ته لاڙ ۾ آهي، ۽ ان کي اتان جا ماڻهون مومل جي پيءُ ڏانهن منسوب ڪندا آهن. اهو عجيب منطق ته هيئن چئبو، جو جيڪڏهن ڪو دعوي ڪري ته ملير ته ڪراچي جي لڳ، بلڪ هاڻي ڪراچي ۾ آهي، ان ڪري مارئي اصل ۾ ڪراچي جي هئي . ماڳن ۽ ماڻهن جي نالا هڪ جهڙا ٿيا ته ڇا ٿي پيو، حقيقتن ۽ واقعن جو پنهنجو پنهنجو تشخص ٿئي ٿو.” نند ڪوٽ“ جيڪڏهن لاڙ ۾ ٿيو ته ڀلي هجي ، پر هن ماڳ کي نند ڪوٽ نه ليڪن مومل جي ماڙي چيو وڃي ٿو. ان ڪري ٻئي ماڳ مختلف آهن ۽ ٻنهي مان فقط هڪ ماڳ ، يعني ” مومل جي ماڙي“ جو تعلق ” مومل ۽ راڻي“ جي قصي سان آهي. البته اهو چوڻ مناسب نه ٿو لڳي ته ڪو مومل ڪاڪ به هتي ٺاهي. مومل ۽ سومل پيءُ جي گهر ۾ ويهي، ناراض پيءُ جي روبرو ڪاڪ محل وارو مانڊاڻ نه مچا يو هوندو. کين گهر ۽ تر ڇڏڻو پيو هوندو، ان ڪري مومل ۽ راڻي جي رومانوي داستان جي جاگرافي جيسلمير، ڪاڪ ڪنڌي ۽ لڊاڻو ۾ ئي موجود آهي ۽ اها ڳالهه عقل کان بعيد نه ٿي نظر اچي. ”تحفته الڪرام“ يا ٻين معلوماتي ذريعن مان جيڪا ڄاڻ ملي ٿي، ان مان بي اهو ئي ثابت ٿئي ٿو مومل ۽ سندن اباڻا هتان جا ئي هيا. پوءِ عشق کي شاباس جنهن ڪاڪ ڪنڌئي تي مومل ۽ مينڌري کي ملايو . جيئن ته ”تحفته الڪرام“ ۽ معلومات جا ٻيا ذريعا اسان کي عمر ۾ وڏا ۽ اسان جي ڀيٽ ۾ مومل جي دور جي ويجهو آهن ان ڪري انهن کي وزن ڏيڻو ئي پوندو. ”لوڪ ادب“ نه فقط ” عوامي ساڃهه “ جو ڀنڊار ٿيندو آهي ، پر اهو تاريخ جو اولڙو ۽ واقفن جو شاهد به ٿيندو آهي. لوڪ ادب ۾ ” داخليت “ جو عنصر وڌيڪ هجڻ باوجود به سپورنجن محققن لاءِ جي ڪچي مواد فراهن ڪرڻ جي سگهه به هوندي آهي، سنڌ ۾ لوڪ ادب اهو ئي ڪم ڪيو آهي ، پر محققن لوڪ ادب ذريعي تاريخي ڇنڊ ڇاڻ وارو ڪم نه ڪيو آهي. ان ڪري سنڌي لوڪ ادب تي انهيءَ حوالي سان نظرثاني واري مطالعي جي ضرورت آهي.
مثال طور لوڪ ادب ۾ مومل راڻي جي قصي جي حوالي سان ٻه روايتون موجود آهن. هڪ لاڙ جي روايت ۽ ٻِي مقبول ، مشهور ۽ ماٿيلي سان لاڳاپيل روايت. لوڪ ادب ۾رومانوي داستانن جو هڪ کان وڌيڪ روايتون ٿينديون آهن. ان مان ڪا اربعا خطا ڪانهي . پر اهو ڪم محققن جو آهي ته ڇنڊي ڇاڻي تحقيق ڪري ڪنهن هڪ روايت کي ” معياري روا يت“ قرار ڏين .
مثال طور ” سهڻي ميهار “ جي هڪ روايت سنڌ جي آهي ۽ ٻِي پنجاب جي. جيڪڏهن پنجاب جو لوڪ شاعر يا سگهڙ جيڪڏهن سسئي پنهون کي ذات جو موضوع بڻائين ته سسئي پنهون قصو ڪو پنجاب جي جغرافيائي حدن جو قصو بڻجي نه پوندو . بنهه انهي ڪسوٽيءَ مطابق مومل راڻي جي قصي جي جيڪڏهن ٿر يا جيسلمير جي روايت آهي ته انهي سان مومل، ماٿيلي ۽ مومل جي ماڙي جي تعلق کي ٽوڙي ٿر يا جيسلمير ۾ ڳولهي ۽ سوچي نه ٿو سگهجي . هن قصي جي معياري روايت کانسواءِ ٻين روايتن جو جنم وٺڻ انهي ڪري ممڪن ۽ جائز ٿي ٿو ته محبت جي مانڊاڻ انهن کي جغرافيائي حدن ان پنهنجي جوت ڏيکاري. اهي روايتون خود مومل راڻي جي وجود ۽ قصي جي تصديق ڪن ٿيون ته مومل راڻي جو قصو خيالي نه پر حقيقت تي مبني هو،
پر لوڪ ادب ۾ انهن جي حيثت جهڙوڪ نيم تاريخي رومانوي داستان واري بڻجي پئي آهي. اسان وٽ لوڪ ادب جي سَهيڙ جو ته ڪم ٿيو آهي . پر ان جي ڇنڊ ڇاڻ تحقيقي ۽ تاريخي بنيادن تي نه ڪئي وئي آهي. انهيءَ ٻئي مرحلي، يعني تحقيق جوآغاز هاڻي اسان کي ڪرڻو آهي. ان ڪري مومل ۽ ماٿيلي جي وارثن کي مومل ۽ مومل جي ماڙي ۽ ماٿيلي جي صحيح صورت پسڻ پسائڻ لاءِ تحقيقي ڪائونسل قائم ڪري لاڳاپيل لوڪ ادب جو تحقيقي جائزو وٺڻو پوندو. انهي سان اسان کي ڪيترين مبهم سوالن جا جواب ملي ويندا.
اڄ هي جو دوستن مانڊاڻ سجايو آهي، ان جي روشنيءَ ۾ مون کي اهو نظر اچي ٿو ته منتظمين کي آرڪيالاجي جي عالمن ۽ محققن تي مشتمل ڪا مستقل ڪاميٽي ٺاهڻي پوندي ته جيئين ڳالهين منجهان کڙ تيل ڪڍي سگهجي .
ضميمو : اهي ڪتاب ۽ مضمون جن ۾ ڪجهه احوال ملي ٿو .
گر بخشاڻي، ڊاڪٽر هوتچند : ” روح رهاڻ“ ايڊو ڪيشنل پبلشنگ ڪمپني، ڪراچي ، 1936.
بلوچ ، ڊاڪٽر نبي بخش ”مومل راڻو“ سنڌي ادبي بورڊ ، حيدرآباد ، 1975
ميمڻ محمد صديق: ”سنڌ جي ادبي تاريخ “ آر. ايڇ احمد ائنڊ برادرس، حيدرآباد.
قانع ، مير علي شير : ”تحفته الڪرام“ ( مترجم مخدوم امير احمد ) ، سنڌي ادبي بورڊ ، حيدرآباد ، 1957.
برٽن رچرڊ: ” سنڌ ۽ سنڌوءَ ماٿر ۾ وسندڙ قومون “ ( مترجم محمد حنيف صديقي) سنڌي ادبي بورڊ ، حيدرآباد ، 1986
ڀمڀاڻي، نارائڻداس : شاهه جو سورميون“ مڪتبه اسحاقيه ڪراچي .
بلوچ. ڊاڪٽر نبي بخش : ”شاهه جو رسالو، شاهه جو ڪلام“
(جلد پنجون ) علام قاضي رسالو تحقيقي رٿا ، حيدرآباد ، 1997
ڄيٺمل پر سرام : ” شاهه جو آکاڻيون “ سنڌ تحقيقي بورڊ ، حيدر آباد ، 1997
بدر ابڙو : ” سنڌ جو شاهه “ شاهه عبدالطيف چيئر ، ڪراچي يونيورسٽي ، ڪراچي ،2000
ميرڪ يوسف : ” تاريخ مظهر شاهجهان“ ( مترجم نياز همايوني) سنڌي ادبي بورڊ ڄامشورو 1999
هينري ڪزنس : ” سنڌ جا قديم آثار “ ( مترجمه عطا محمد ڀنڀرو) سنڌي ادبي بورڊ ڄامشورو 1995
راورٽي : ” سنڌ جو مهراڻ“ ( مترجمه عطا محمد ڀنڀرو) ، سنڌي ٻولي جو بااختيار ادارو، حيدرآباد، 1995
مير معصوم : ،”تاريخ معصومي“ ( مترجم مخدوم امير احمد) ، سنڌي ادبي بورڊ حيدرآباد ، 1959
رائچند هريجن: ”تاريخ ريگستان“ ( ڀاڱو ٻيو ) ، سنڌي ادبي بورڊ ڄام شورو ، 1988
انصاري اشتياق : ” سنڌ جا ڪوٽ ۽ قلعا “ سنڌيڪا اڪيڊمي ، ڪراچي ، 1994
الانا، ڊاڪٽر غلام علي: لاڙ جي ادبي ۽ ثقافتي تاريخ “ سنڌ الاجي ڄامشورو ، 1977
مرزا قليچ بيگ : قديم سنڌ ۽ ان جا مشهور ۽ ماڻهو“
بلوچ ، ڊاڪٽر نبي بخش : سنڌي ٻولي جي مختصر تاريخ “ زيب ادبي مرڪز ، حيدرآباد ، 1962
سياقي، محمد دبير: ” ديوان حڪيم فرخي “ تهوان، 1949
دائود پوٽه، ڊاڪٽر عمربن محمد : ” شاهه ڪريم بلڙي واري جو ڪلام“ بمبئي 1937.
تاج جويو : سر مومل راڻو “ ڀٽ شاهه ثقافتي مرڪز، 2004
بلوچ ، ڊاڪٽر نبي بخش ” ميمڻ عيسا جو ڪلام“ سنڌي ادبي بورڊ ، حيدرآباد
ڀيرو مل مهر چند آڌواڻي :” سوڍن جي صاحبي يا راڻن جو راڄ “ گلشن پبليڪيشن ، حيدرآباد،1990
مولوي محمد عظيم: ” ڀٽ ڌڻي عرف فڪر لطيف “ ، محمد عظيم ۽ سنز ، شڪارپور،1963
معموريوسفاڻي : ” ڀٽ ڌڻي جا ٿر تان ڀيرا “ مهراڻ اڪيڊمي شڪارپور.
سانگي ، مير عبدالحسين : ” لطائف لطيفي“ ڀٽ شاهه ثقافتي مرڪز، 1986 .
لاشاري، رشيد احمد : ” سرمومل راڻو“ آر. ايڇ. احمد ۽ برادرس ، حيدرآباد، 1961.
ڊاڪٽر خورشيد عباسي : ”قومي ادبي ڪانفرنس ، سومرا دور مقالا“سنڌي شعبو،ڪراچي ، 2007
مرزا قليچ بيگ : ” قديم سنڌ “ حيدرآباد ، 1921
مولائي شيدائي : ” تاريخ تمندن سنڌ “ سنڌ يونيورسٽي حيدرآباد ، 1959
مولائي شيدائي : ” جنت السنڌ“ ، سنڌي ادبي بورڊ حيدرآباد ، 1957
بلوچ ، ڊاڪٽر نبي بخش : ” ٻِيلائن جا ٻول“ 1951
مير معصوم : ” تاريخي معصومي“ سنڌي ادبي بورڊ حيدرآباد
خداداد خان، : ” لب تاريخ سنڌ “ سنڌي ادبي بورڊ ڄامشورو
عبدالغني عبدالله : ” تاريخ سنڌ “ ( ڀاڱو ٽيون) سنڌ مسلم ادبي سوسائٽي حيدرآباد ، 1939
اعجاز الحق قدويسي ،: ” تاريخي سنڌ “ ( اردو) ، اردو بورڊ ، لاهور، 1971
مولوي، عبدالله شائق، :” دولت علويا“ حيدرآباد ، 2003
عبدالڪريم نظاماڻي : تاريخ سومرا سنڌ پر ايڪ نظر ( اردو ) ، ڪراچي ، 1962
بلوچ ، ڊاڪٽر نبي بخش ” سومرن جو دور “ ، سنڌي ادبي بورڊ ، ڄامشورو ، 1986 .
وزير علي سومرو: ” تاريخ سومرا سنڌ “ ( ٽي جلد) ، شڪارپور، 2001 ، 2003 ۽ 2004
عمر سومرو: ” تصوير سنڌ “ (ليکڪ ايم. ايڇ پنهور )
سومرا نئشنل ڪائونسل ، ڪراچي 2006
بلوچ ، ڊاڪٽر نبي بخش ، ” ميسن شاهه عنايت جو ڪلام“ سنڌي ادبي بورڊ ، حيدرآباد ،1963
جوڻيجو، ڊاڪٽر عبدالجبار:”سنڌي ادب جي مختصر تاريخ“ حيدرآباد ، 1983
ميمڻ عبدالمجيد سنڌي : ” سنڌي ادب جو تاريخي جائزو “ عجائب اسٽور ، سکر ، 1974 .
DEATH: Shaikh Ayaz (Shikarpur/
Literature/1997)
http://www.gulhayat.com/
Dr.Dur Muhammad Pathan
Email: sindhilegend¡yoo.com
Cell: +923337526616
+923453910063
DR.DUR MUHAMMAD PATHAN PRESIDES OVER LITERARY SESSION OF THE SHAIKH AYAZ CONFERENCE.
On the eve of 14th Death Anniversary of the great poet- Shaikh Ayaz, the conference was held today in Shah Abdul Latif University by Shaikh Ayaz Chair with cooperation of the Culture Department. It was inugurated by Madam Sasui Palijo, minister Culture, Govt. of Sindh. This session was presided over by Dr.Nilofar Shaikh, Vice Chancellor of the University.The Paper reading Session was presided over by a panel headed by Dr.Dur Muhammad Pathan. Dr.Kazi Khadim, Dr.Noor
“Remembrance Day: Heroes of Sindh” – An event of vital importance.
Dr. Dur Muhammad Pathan
Thanks to the World Sindhi Congress and Sindhi Sangat U.K for arranging this event of vital importance. To me, this event will pave way for launching of Awareness Movement in Sindh and abroad. Western world will be appraised of the sorrows and longings of Political Activists of Sindh. People in Sindh will be sure about the every possible help and support from their country-men living in other countries.
Another importance of the event is of Research Value. Both, WSC and SS UK have invited attention of Researchers to conduct research on those Heroes of Sindh, who have scarified their lives for their country- her independence and bright future. I will pray that both Organizations must take initiate and sponsor the proposed Research Project.
Sindh has a wonderful record of her political lovers:
In 1839, when Manora was occupied and Karachi was surrendered, people of Karachi, in protest, killed an English Captain . Twenty people were arrested and five of them were hanged.
Soon after beginning of the East India Company Rule Thakurs of Tharparkar put office of Mukhtyarkar on fire. Napier was asked by the Governor-General to take care of situation. He sanctioned Annual Financial support for purchasing loyalty Upper Class of Thakurs and other Tribes. It is on record’
During Mutiny of 1857, Sindhi availed opportunity of launching Movement against Rulers. Involved Sindhis were sent to Andaman in 1858. Soldiers of the Government, those were planning for revolt, were captured and blown up with Canon at the place near to the Empress Market.
Hur Movement and underground Movement lunched by Pir Pagaro (Soorih Badshah) took sacrifices of so many lives, including of Pir Pagaro. Martial Law was imposed on Eastern Part of Sindh.
Congress launched so many movements of Non-Cooperation, Quit India etc. Its worker were killed in police shooting in Karachi. Great Hero of this era is a young Hindu of Sukkur, Himo Kalani.
During Khilafat Movement participants faced State Terrorism. in spite of that so many people denounced Titles, earned imprisonment and refused to get Financial support from Government for their Schools/Maktabs.
Muslim League played an ugly role to divide hearts. Its Movement for restoration of Masjid Manzilgah was meant to divide Sindh into Hindu and Muslim Camps. It was terrible game. We lost Bhagat Kanwar and Hassand Pamnani. They were real Heros of Sindh. Masjid Manzilgah took lives of so many innocent people. They all are our victimized and forgotten Heroes.
Allah Bux Soomro was killed and his killing was sponsored by the Government.
After the partition and soon after inception of Jeay Sind , Sindh has been witnessing terrible state terrorism. So many young people and office bearers of J.S, has been disappeared by force, and handsome number has been killed mercilessly. They sacrificed their lives for their Motherland. They all are our Heroes. We received dead bodies of Thori Phatak ja Shaheed, Habibullah Narejo, Samiullah Kalhoro, Qurban Khuhawar, Rooplo Cholhiani, Noorulla Tunio, Ijaz Solangi and others. Even, Bashir Qureshi was not spared and his life was taken in indirect way. These are not only Shaheed Heroes of our times, the number is very high.
My briefing is to make you realize that there is dire need of conducting research on the topic of Heroes of Sindh, as it will some sort of paying tribute to them. Gul Hayat institute will extend unconditional support in providing source mater and sharing Research Methodology.
What Peoples say about Gul Hayat.
INTERNATIONAAL InSTITUUT VOOR SOCIALE GESCHIEDENIS
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL HISTORY
INTERNATIONALES INSTITUT FUR SOZIAL GESCHICHTE
INSTITUT INTERNATIONAL D’HISTOIRE SOCIALE
Dr Dur Mohammad Pathan,
Gul Hayat Institute,
Vill: Khair Muhammad Arija,
District: Larkana, Sindh,
PAKISTAN
Amsterdam,
Our ref.: 7 September 1998
Your ref.:
Dear Dr Pathan,
Having reported on my visit to the Gul Hayat Institute, I can confirm that the International Institute of social History (IISH) has been impressed by the considerable efforts made by the Gul Hayat Institute (GHI) over the past eight years in preserving valuable historical material on Sindh society.
IISH realizes that you and your family have sacrificed much for the realization of this archive in the village of Khair Muhammad Arija.
IISH considers it important that such work should be facilitated in the future. In this spirit, we would like to suggest that GHI and IISH be affiliated to each other. The purpose of this affiliation is to help ensure that material on the history of Sindh and other parts of Pakistan be conserved for future generations. IISH is looking forward to co-operation with GHI in the exchange of information and in other ways that may be of mutual benefit.
We trust that this affiliation will lead to a strengthening of the GHI as well as to more scholarly interest in the history of Sindh at the IISH. To this end, we invite you, Dr dur Mohammad Pathan, in your personal capacity as well as in that of Director of the Gul Hayat Institute, to initiate this new co-operation between our Institutes in Sindh.
Your Sincerely,
Pro. Willem van Schendel
Asia Department
Cruquiusweg 31 – NL-1019 AT AMSTERDAM – Tel 31-20-6685866 – Fax 31-20-6654181
ABN – AMRO Bank 41.13.90.805 – Postgiro 4740245
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
ABIAmerican Biographical Institute, Inc.
Publisher of Biographical Reference Works since 1967
Member of the Publishers Association of the South
National Association of Independent Publishers
Main Office: 5126 Bur Oak Circle, PO Box 3121 Raleigh, North Carolina 27622 USA * Established 1967 * Fax H9-781-8712
The Governing Board of Editors of the American Biographical Institute
takes pleasure in announcing that
Dr. Dur Muhammad Pathan
has been nominated to receive the distinct honor of
2000 Millennium Medal of Honor
The ABI is the publisher of biographical reference volumes such as the International Directory of Distinguished Leadership, Personalities of America, Five Thousand Personalities of the World, International Book of Honor, and Most Admired Men and Women of die Year. These volumes, and others are recognizedthroughout the world as leading sources of reference on outstanding individuals.
The American Biographical Institute honors those individuals who are contributing to a better society by building better communities through outstanding service on local, state, or international levels. These leaders contribute their time and talents to civic organizations, public and private schools, universities and colleges, government organizations, professional groups, religious organizations, and more. Dr. Dur Muhammad Pathan is among a select group who have been nominated because of his outstanding accomplishments to date and noble example ne has set for his peers and entire community.
Criteria for 2000 Millennium Medal of Honor is based on merit. The American Biographical Institute acknowledges successful individuals whose achievements represent a diverse range of activities such as business executives, volunteer workers, fund raisers, entrepreneurs, researchers, educators, associations organizers and officers, community project leaders, trendsetters, decision-makers, artists, humanitarians, entertainers, inventors, authors, musicians, and others whose activities will effect future generations. The 2000 Millennium Medal of Honor award stands for exceptional deeds and dedication to goals.
We hope you mil assist the American Biographical Institute in recognizing the accomplishments of Dr. Dur Muhammad Pathan
Sincerely,
J. M. Evans
President
December 1998
ڊاڪٽر غلام علي الانا: ڪي شاگرد پنهنجي محنت، جذبي ۽ ڪوشش سان ايڏو وڏو ڪم ڪري ويندا آهن جنهن جي ڪري نه فقط سندن نالو روشن ٿيندو آهي، پر سندن اهي ڪم سندن استادن جو ڳاٽ اوچو ڪندا آهن، اهڙن ماڻهن مان هڪ ماڻهو آهي. ڊاڪٽر در محمد پٺاڻ. ڊاڪٽر در محمد پٺاڻ جو هي ڪم ڏسي مون کي نه فقط خوشي ٿي آهي پر فخر به ٿيو اٿم، ڊاڪٽر پٺاڻ منهنجو شاگرد آهي، ن Ph.d جي ڊگري منهنجي رهنمائيءَ ۾ حاصل ڪئي آهي. گل حيات انسٽيٽيوٽ جو نالو ته اخبارن ۾ پڙهندو رهيو آهيان پر اڄ هيءُ ادارو وزٽ ڪري، هت گڏ ڪيل مواد ڏسي، مواد کي جنهن ڍنگ سان رکيو ويو آهي، اهو سڀ ڪجهه ڏسي پنهنجي دل مان اها دعا نڪري ٿي ته رب ڪريم ڊاڪٽر در محمد پٺاڻ کي خوش رکي، آباد رکي ۽ سالم صحت ڏي. هن اداري جهڙو ادارو ٺاهڻ اڪيلي ماڻهوءَ جو ڪم ٿي نه آهي، يقين ئي نٿو اچي ته ڪو ڊاڪٽر پٺاڻ اڪيلي سر هي ادارو پاڻ ٺاهيو آهي. ادارو ته مون به ٺاهيا آهن، پر اُتي مون سان گڏ ماڻهن جي ٽيم هوندي هئي پر مون جڏهن هت اچي ڏٺو ته هت ٻيو ڪو به ڪارڪن ڪونهي پر در محمد اڪيلي سر هن اداري جو پنو پنو گڏ ڪيو آهي، انهن پنن کي سليقي سان موضوع مطابق سهيڙيو آهي، سڄي سنڌ هت يڪجا ڪئي اٿس، آءُ يقين سان چوان ٿو ته هن فقير تن تنها، بنا ڪنهن سرڪاري مدد ۽ سهاري جي جيڪي ڪجهه گڏ ڪيو آهي، اهو سنڌالاجيءَ ۾ گڏ ڪيل مواد کان ڪنهن به صورت ۾ گهٽ ڪونهي. جيڪڏهن سنڌ جي يونيورسٽين ۾ ڊاڪٽر در محمد پٺاڻ جهڙا پنج پنج محنتي ڪارڪن هجن، جيڪي سنڌ تي تحقيق سان شوق رکندا هجن ۽ جذبي سان ڪم ڪن ته مون کي اميد آهي ته سنڌ جي تاريخ، ثقافت، ٻولي، سياسي ۽ سماجي موضوعن تي مواد گڏ ٿي ويندو. آءُ دل جي گهراين سان ڊاڪٽر در محمد پٺاڻ کي تمام گهڻيون، گهڻيون مبارڪون ڏيان ٿو، مون کي پنهنجي هن لائق شاگرد جو هي ڪم ڏسي تمام گهڻو فخر آهي، دل چاهي ته سندس پيشاني چمان. ڌڻي خوش رکي. غلام علي الانا 16.4.1999 We human beings are historical animals; we can not function with out a sense of our history. But much of History is lost because historical evidence is not preserved. This allows myths about the past to be fabricated, often in the service of powerful groups and individuals. It is the taste of historians to expose such myths – but for this they need evidence. It is here that the Gulhayat I institute provides a unique initiative for the understanding of t he complex history 0 f Sindh as well as the greater region. It has collected, preserved and made available to researchers an unparalleled collection of historical Source. (13.8.98. Willen van Schendel, Representative 0 f the international Institute 0 f Social History, Nether Land). “Great Congratulations. May your work become the seed of many educational, cultural and historical institutions all over Sindh. Please keep the UNESCO, the SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE and other learned bodies regularly informed of your wonderful work” (Dr. G.M.Mehkri, dt. 06.06.91). “Dr. Pathan has developed the institute into the first of its kind in Sindh, and with distinction of coming up with out any kind of government help in the institute, you have to simply name the man famous in certain field and within moments you get complete profile.” (Dr. Maula Bux. “Date line Larkana”.DAWN, dt. June 3, 1991). I congratulate you on the fine example you are setting for your peers and society. (lM.Evan, Editorial Director American Biographical Institute, dt. Feb. 7, 1997). “It has been most interesting to learn of the existence of the institute, and see some of the material which has been collected. It was particularly interesting to look through some of the items relating to my late father, H.T.Lambrick” (Charles lambrick 4th Jan: 1997). “This is a most impressive and clearly valuable source of material on Sindh history, culture and politics, and a great achievement as a private initiative”. (George Lambrik, 4.1.1997). It was really an exciting omen to visit Gul Hayat Institute. The fascinating research activities to preserve the culture and politics of Sindh is marvelous. The founder is not only a source of inspiration, but also a sign of socio – religious philosophy and though.” (Syed AnwarIqbal, Dept. of Anthropology, Quaid-e-Azam university, Islamabad. Dee: 4,1996), impression. Pakistan 25.09.1996). This institute is really impressive and leaves one with good needs to have more of such institutions. “{Nino Puljek, Croatia, dt. “It is amazing that one person could, through his own efforts and sources create such an institution. This is a great contributiol1 to the intellectual development of Sindh. Future historians and scholars will benefit a lot from this material collected here. I hop the Government wouldextend some help to this institute and make it a national Institution “(Iqbal Jafar, T.V.D. Islamabad. dt. 05.02.1996). “I am deeply impressed b y the material available in Gul H ayat. Dr. Pathan’s efforts are laudable. His endeavors will go down in history; I congratulate him on this wonderful work” (Fakhar Zaman, Chairman, National Commission on History & Culture and Pakistan Academy of Letters, dt. 5.1.1996). “The experience of being here is inexplicable. The treasurers hidden here in this remote village in them selves are commendable but the thought and efforts behind this all can not be valued in simple words”. (Ms. Durdana Bhutt. T.V. Star dt. 19.11.1993). “Gul Hayat is the source of inspiration and a seat of mental development for desiring people”. (Dr. Rajub AMemon. Tando Jam University)
RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION OF
DR. DUR MUHAMMAD PATHAN
Ex-Member Board of Governors Cadet College Larkano
Ex-Member, B.LS.E, Larkano (1998 – 1999).
Ex- Member, Board of Studies Shah Latif University, Khairpur.
Member, B.O.G of Sindhi Adabi Board, Jmashoro (1989 to 1991, & sitting member).
Ex- Member, Academic council of the B.LS.E, Larkano.
Ex- Member, BOG, Mirza Kaleech Baig Chair University of Sindh.
Ex- Member BOG, Bilawal research Institute Nawshah.
Paper Setter for Inter, B.A, M.A (Sindhi Subject) for various Universities & Boards.
RESEARCH
Examiner for M.Phil & Ph.D in various subjects for various Universities.
Approved Ph.D Guide in Sindhi
(University of Sindh & Shah Latif University, Khairpur).
Approved Ph.D GUIDE in Pakistan Studies
(University of Sindh & Shah Latif University, Khairpur). Approved Ph.D GUIDE in Education’
(University of Sindh).
Approved Ph.D GUIDE in Sindhology (University of Sindh)
Approved Ph.D GUIDE in History & Culture (Pakistan Study Centre, Jamshoro).
Approve Ph.D GUIDE in Pakistan Studies (Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur).
Approved M.Phil GUIDE in Pakistan Studies (Quid-I-Azam University, Islamabad).
Guided / Produced:
CONTRIBUTION:
I. Feroza Sammo. M.Phil in Sindhi, (Sindh University).
Topic: “ Child Literature in Sindhi Language ”.
II. Dr. Bashir Ahmed “Shad”. Ph.D in Sindhi (Sindh University).
Topic: “ Life & Poetry of Moulvi Sanauallah Abassi”.
III. Mr. Imdad Hussain, M.Phil, in Pakistan Studies (Quid-I-Azam University Islamabad).
Topic: “Hassian Ali Effindey – Life & Educational Services”.
IV. Dr. Imdad Hussain Sahito Ph.D in Pakistan Studies, (Shah Latif University)
Topic: “Decade of Dacoits in Sindh”.
V. Zulfiqar Jalbani . M.Phil in Sindhi (Shah Latif University).
Topic: “ Life & Contribution of Gulam Rabani Agro”.
VI. Dr. Ahsan Danish, Ph.D in Sindhi (Sindh University) (Co- Guide).
Topic: “ Study of Poetry of Shah Latif”.
VII. Dr. Fayaz Latif Ph.D in Sindhi (Sindh University) (Co- Guide).
Topic: “Study of Poetry of Shaikh Ayaz”.
Ph.D Examiner
1. Dr. Muhammad Idrees Sommoro, Ph.D in Islamiat (Sindh University)
Topic: “Literary role of Religious Leaders”.
2. Dr. Adal Sommoro, Ph.D in Sindhi,(Shah Latif University).
Topic: “ History of Sindhi Adabi Sangat”.
3. Dr. Kadim Mahar, Ph.D in Sindhi,(Shah Latif University).
Topic: “Study of Poetry of Tenveer Abbasi”.
And other more Ph.D & M.Phil Students.
VIII . Introduced and worked on a unique project of “PRESERVATION OF HISTORY, CULTURE & LITERATURE OF SINDH” at the Institute Of Sindhology.
IX. Helped in establishing Museum in Sindh Madressah-Tul-Islam, Karachi.
X. Established Educational ‘Museum of District Larkano in D.O.E Colleges), Office.
XI. WORKS REFERED / QUOTED BY SCHOLARS:
I. Allah Rakhio Butt, in his book “History of Sindhi Journals”, 1981.
II. G. Allana, in his book “Ginans of Ismaili pirs”, 1984.
III. Dr. Mumtaz Bukhari, in his thesis for Ph. D, in Sindhi (Sindh University).
IV. Dr. Azizul Rehman, in his thesis for Ph. D, in Journalism (SindhUniversity).
V. Dr. Ghulam Rasool Baloch, in his thesis for Ph. D, in Sindhi (S.U).
VI. Dr. Mazharuddin, in his thesis for Ph. D, in Political Science, (S.U).
VII. Dr. Shamis Abbasi, in her thesis for Ph. D in Sind hi (Sindh University).
VIII. Dr. Khan Muhammad Punhwar, in his thesis for Ph.D in Journalism (S.U)
IX. Dr. Badar Ujjan in his thesis for Ph. D , in Sindhi (Shah Latif University).
X. Dr. Ghulam Rasool Sooinro, in hIs thesis for Ph.D in Sindhi (Kar: University).
XI. Dr. lmdad Hussain Sahito, in his thesis for Ph.D in Pakistan Studies (S.A.L.U)
XII. Dr. Khan Mohammad Larik , in his thesis for Ph.D in Islamic Culture (S.U).
XIII. Dr. M. Laique Zardary, in his thesis for Ph.D in Political Science (S. U).
XIV. Dr. M ldrees Soomro, in his thesis for Ph.D in Islamic Culture (S. U).
XV. Dr. Bashir Ahmed, in his thesis for Ph.D in Sindhi (Sindh Univesity).
XVI. Dr. Abdul Razak Soomro, in his thesis for Ph.D in Islamic Culture (S.U).
Sindh and the Indian Mutiny of 1857 By C.L. Mariwalla, BA.
(Read before the Sind” Historical Society 011 21st August 1940) The mutiny of 1R57was the last armed upheaval to overthrow the British in India. It was not only a sepoy mutiny but the mutiny of the Indian people as a whole. Thus wrote the Press, London. dated lst August 1857:_ “If the disaffection is confined to the sepoys and the civil population arc with us what on earth docs the Government of India mean hy troubling us with its calls fl’r European troops and its telegraphic alarms? There are men enough within its reach to raise ten armies from if the people be only well affected to us, as the ministers and directors state”. And it makes an interesting account to be recapitulating the part Sindh played in that futile attempt. Before we recount the incidents of this unsuccessful attempt in Sindh, it would not be out of place to consider the immediate causes of the rebellion and the elaborate arrangements made, inspire of a vigilant Government, Here is a version of how the army discontent was roused, as given by the Bombay Times, dated 2nd June 1857. Cartridges for the Enfield rifle were contracted to be made at Dum Dum in India. One day a Clashce who was engaged in making the new cartridges. met a Brahmin sepoy, lotah in hand. The Clashcc asked for a drink which the Brahmin declined to give as he did not know the other’s caste. “Caste”, replied the Clashcc, “In a few days, you will have no caste, for you will have to bite cartridges greased with the Iat of the bullocks and pigs”. The Bengal army contained high class men and this news soon spread among them. Pollusion and conversion to -Christianity was thought to he the aim of the introduction of the new cartridges. But that could not be the only cause of the mutiny, though it was the main cause. In the houses of Parliament it was brought to the notice 01 the members that contrary to contract. some fat in question had rcallv been used and thi~ informal ion resulted in a retort from Mr.’ Disracli who was in opposition at that time, The second and the final cause, in the words or the “Bombay Times” is as follows:_ “What lies at the bottom of the existing contumacy is a desire for increase in Pay.” lncrcascd ~25Sind!, Obscrv ..t! heaviness of duties due to the attempt at extension of the British Empire made the sepovs feel that they had a claim to higher pay. Whatever. might have been the ulterior motives of the leaders of the mutiny, these two were quite potent causes and it is surprising that no active sleps were taken to nip the trouble in the bud: instead, some interested persons were Janning the fire successfully. The success of a country-wide mutiny greatly depended on the speed of communications. For this purpose a novel plan was put into force which proved to be immensely successful. Here is the story and a comment thereon from the Friend of India, dated 24th March 1858:- “One morning towards the end of the last month (he officials of Fatehgarh were all in commotion, From Thana after Thana there arrived lillle.chappaties about 2 inches in diameter, It appeared that a few evenings previous, a Chowkidar from Cawnpore ordered a Chowkidar in Fatehgarh to make and bake 12 Chappaties such as the one he showed. Two he was to retain. Two more were to be given to each of the five nearest Chowkidars. The order was obeyed and long there was running and baking of Chappaties. The five’ obeyed orders also and distributed their message to 25 and so the affair went on, the cakes sweeping over the district at a speed at which no Indian post yet travels. The wave has not stopped yet. Is there to be an ‘explosion of feeling’, or only of laughter? Are the Chappaties of the Fiery Cross or only an indigestible edible, a cause of revolt or only of the Colic.” Having seen that the communications were prompt, and the people willing, thus “armed the mutiny broke out at Barrackpore. . ” Sindh had just been relieved from its Chaotic state under the Talpurs, in 1843. It was enjoying the benign rule of Sir Bartle Frere. The people had just settled down to a normal Peace-Time when the mutiny broke out. They were fully conscious of the great advantages of the new rule. They hardly mutincd. Not that alone. They helped the rulers considerably, to quell the rising. Here is a short diary of the events that look place in Sindh during the mutiny: _ Early in 1857, soon after Ihe out-break of the mutiny at Barrakporc, the harrowing talc~ ·of the butchery of the Europeans reached Karachi. The community was up and alarmed. They met i;l a public meeting on the 2()th (If June, under the Presidency of Sir 22(1Sind” and the Indian Mutin» of 1857 Bartle Frore. All bore anxious faces. It was a tense atmosphere. At last Sir Bartle broke the icc. He gave a brief account of the mutiny as culled from the official information received by him. He assured those present that they need not be afraid since there was no danger of an out-break in his province. This greatly relieved those present and the meeting dispersed. As soon as the mutiny assumed an All-India form, the Government of India passed the Press Gagging Act. This greatly handicapped the Press, who contemptuously termed it as the Black Act. Here is what the Sindh Kossid, a Bi-weekly of Karachi, of those days, says about it: – Never was a gubernotical act more ill-timed or ill-judged than that which has placed a tyrranical censorship over the Indian Press.” And in Sindh the axe first fell on the Sindh Kossid itself. This is how an editorial dated Friday 18th September 1857 details out the incident: – The proprietor printer and manager of the Sind” Kossid were summoned on Tuesday last to attend the Magistrate’s office to answer for ‘an article’. that appeared in our journal. The summons being for ‘immediate’ attendance and the vague allusion to ‘an article’ put us about not a Jittlf’_ first to • procure swift steeds to do ourselves the honour of ‘immediate’ attendance and secondly at looking. over all the paper in question and wondering what article it might bethat we were called upon to answer for. However the several parties attended, being escorted by the Editor who had fearlessly taken the brunt upon himself to answer all enquiries. The Magistrate, having received the usual salutations from the men of the Press, proceeded, with paper in hand, to read a part of our Kotri correspondent’s letter regarding an incident that had taken place at Kotri. Having accomplished this task of reading aloud. the authority before whom we were standing assured us (hat there was not the slightest truth in the statement, and that such mis-statements would oblige him to ‘stop the press’. He desired to be acquainted with the authority for the statement, which of course we ‘declined to furnish under any circumstances. We on our part assured “he Magistrate that the statement had been conveyed to us lhrough a gentleman upon whose veracity we had the utmost confidence and that it found a place in our columns under the impression that it Was correct. that we were sorry to find. [rum . thc Magistrate’s a~~lIrance. it was not so and that we should be careful in Iuturc nut til lay ourselves open to any such st;.ll\:l1Jcnt~. \The Magistrate exerted agall1 and reitcnlLcd hi, intention or “””7–,Sindh Ohsl”’w/ “stopping the press” should any mis-statements again find their way into our paper.” As the distress of the European community increased, a dcmi- official voluntary aid fund was started at Karachi. to which all ungrudgingly subscribed. This proved of great avail to the refugees. As the circumstances required, the Commissioner issued proclamations prohibiting sale of lire-arms and ammunition to the native population without previous Government permission. as also transmission of lead. sulphur, salt-petre, gun-powder etc. except for Government purposes. The Commissioner ordered a recruiting depot to he established in Upper Sindh, which in a short time, recruited battalians of Bcloochees for active service against the mutineers. Seth Naumal of Karachi made a gesture of loyalty hy promising to furnish a loyal and sturdy force of 3000 strong from Africa, if the Government provided the conveyance. He and the other Sethias of Karachi gave all the facilities that the Europeans mostly needed at this time . • The Government also opened a camel train from Karachi to Mullan, having stations after every 20 miles or so, where at each station were stationed about 50 camels ready for work. By means of this arrangement and the Indus Flotilla, the regiments were sent to the Punjab to suppress the rebellion there. But all was not quiet in Sindh. Lieut: Battis Combe received news on the 9th September of a plot at Hyderabad fixed for the 12th instant. ‘The cool courage of Brigadier Morris, and a timely gallop of the mounted police sufficed to prevent the signals of the disaffection taking effect.” The Native infantry was ordered a special parade immediately, where they were disarmed and the ring-leaders arrested. Even the native guard on the Fort was replaced by the ~u;trd of the Royal Fusilicrs and the fort guns were mounted for any crncrgcncv, A Court Marshal was held where the arch conspirator H a\ aldar Coornbarsing \Va!’>ordered to be shot from the guns, his accomplices were either to he hanged or were transported for life, only two being acquitted. ‘When the Havaldar came 10 face his ordeal. he lashed his hack to the muzzle. The port fire was lighted- rl’;ld~’ lirc- and ;”,,’ay’ he went full sweep. a portion of the hack-bone nc.ulv kuockiru; I Ill’ Dl’!1l1ly Collvrtor from his camel.”Sindh and the lndian Mutinv tit 1857 A dreamy hut dark suspicion of the fidelity of the 21st. N. I. stationed al Karachi, had been entertained due to its containing a numher of Bengalis. .On Sunday 13th September at 11 p.m. two Oudh Brahmin native officers or the 21st N.J. betrayed their comrades by informing their officers Major Mc. Gregor about the mutiny planned by the regiment at 2 p.m. on Monday morning. An orderly of the 21st. N.1. independent of the Oudh Brahmins, had similarly informed the Major. It had been decided to capture the treasury. murder the officers and proceed tn I-Iyderahad. Prompt arrangements were made to meet the situation. Major Mct ircgor immediately “consulted the Brigade Authorities, who without a moment’s delay ordered the whole of the European troops to he assembled and marched to the scene of anticipated revolt. The troops were lined up .Irthe parade ground or the 21st N.L, with two Artillery guns on each flank. After due arrangements, the assembly of the 21st N.I. was ordered, which met after due reluctance. This ncccssuatcd two Nine Pounders to he summoned for any eventuality. The roll was called and alkr a few words being addressed to them. the order to tile arms was given and was promptly obeyed. without a murmur. The European Infantry tonk charge of the arms and on inspection. 40 lire-locks were [ound loaded. After the disarming a strict search ‘vas made of the huts of the 21st N.t. and nothing beyond a few swords were recovered”, “All this was done within three quarters of an hour” and ‘so quietly that the majority of the town-folk wen: not even aware of the military movements, until after many hours: All this points to the prompt way in which the situation was handled hy the authorities, 36 men or the 21st N,I. were found missing. Of these (i were caught immediately, 1 were secured in camp the next day, and 11 more were captured while crossing the H ubb: hut’ still some ring-leaders were at large, specially the chid conspirator Color Havaldar Ramdin Pandey. The police force of I:’iO and 4 companies of drilled infantry under. Major Marston, assisted bv captain Pirie and Khan SaheiJ Ghoolam Hussain, the adjutant of the force. pursued the 3(, fugitives and brought in or otherwise accounted for them all. Immediate steps were alsu taken to safeguard every European resident. Ladies Iound a fine rcndczvou« in the capacious mess room of the. Second European Light Infantrv and the Civilians armed themselves against any auack. The principul roads of the Cantonment were lined in the twinkling of an eye with a complete chain (If fO;lt and horse patrol. 22()Si”d” Oh.~t’/wd who kept open the communication and prevented stragglers or bad- characters from perambulating the streets or looting the deserted Bungalows. Volunteer Corps for night patrol were started in Camp to relieve the European troops for a state of efficiency in emergency. Here is a circular issued by the commissioner to that effect dated ]6th September lS57: – “By the desire of Major General Scott, commanding the Division, all able-bodied non-military men possessing a horse and arms and willing to volunteer for patrol duties in and about the station, are invited to report themselves to Major Goldsmith or to Captain Johnstone who will give them instructions regarding the duty to be performed. It is suggested that for the present none should offer themselves who have family tics which render it a primary duty to remain at home and protect .their household.” Sd: H.B.E. Frere. European residents were promised easy supply of lire-arms for defence. The 14th N.I. was not touched due to their proven loyalty. At the time these incidents took place, the Commissioner Sir Bartle Frere was at his Bungalow at Clifton. Major Goldsmith’ was with him at that time. The Commissioner was immediately informed of the situation by Captain Johnstone. On hearing of the disturhance Sir Bartle came to town and inspected the Native lines. He found the state quite satisfactory. Out of the deserters 10 were caught and Court-Marshalled on the Hith and 17th of September. Of them 7 were sentenced to be hanged and the rest were to be shot from the guns. Seven more were captured and 3 others died during the capture. At long last the Arch-conspirator Ramdin Pondey was’ secured and shot from the guns on the nrd September, while his remaining accomplices were transported for life. They were marched along the Bunder Road under police escort to the Bundar to board the “Chusan” bound for Bombay. There was a semblance or a mutiny in the 16th Native Infantry at Shikarpur, but the trouble was nipped in the bud. The battery rose at mid-night and from their barrack-square commenced firing in all directions from which that place was accessible; but the prompt action of Colonel Stewart, the collector, and Colonel Montgomary, the police chief, out-witted and captured them. Soon after the force sat down before Delhi, the Frontier tribes planned their rising. Their leader Durriah Khan, the Chief of the Jakranis was to come to Jacohabad at 5 p.m., and his co-traitor Oil 2~OSindh and ‘he Indian Mutin» 1)( 1857 Murad, the chief of the khojas, was to follow at 10 a.m. the following day, when they had decided to butcher Major Mcrewcthcr and his officers who were to sit in durhar on that day. But lit 5-30 p.m., half an hour after his arrival Dhurriakhan was on a fast trotting camel on his way to Sukkur, heavily ironed, to he placed on board the steamer lying ready to start for Karachi. Two days later Oil Murad Khan, who made. off for the hills on hearing of his fcllowtraitor’s fate. followed in the same manner and the out-break was prevented. On the whole there was no serious trouble in Sindh. For this the Commissioner was chiefly responsible. He had so pleased the populace that they willingly recruited and formed into those brave Balooch regiments which were responsible for the capture of Delhi by the Government. Here is what seth Naumal says about the altitude of the Commissioner during the days of the mutiny: – “1 cannot sufficiently admire the patience. thought, judgment and courage evinced hy Sir Bartle Frere during these troublous and trying times.” But Sir Bartle ‘had to seck the co-operation of the people. Inspire of the fact that ..the generality of people in Sindh said that the English rule in India had well nigh come to a dose”, they fully co-operated with the Government. Sir Fredrick Goldsmith wrote in the Asiatic Quarterly Review as follows:- When speaking of the dead, those natives must not he forgotten who enabled Frere in the hour of danger to British Rule to dispense with his legitimate garrisons and trust to the resources drawn to himself from the hearts of the people he governed. . That has heen the tendency of Sindh all along. Thus Sindh played its part jn the mutiny of 1H57. Authorities quoted: – Nil. I ‘Memoirs of SCIh Naurnal’. No.2 ‘Sindh Kossid Filc~. 1~57. Nil ..’ ‘Our Paper’ File IR67
Feb 1990 | Violent anti-government demonstrations organized by the Mohajir Quami Movement (MQM, a movement of Urdu-speaking Muslim immigrants who left India in 1947) in Karachi, the capital of Sindh and the largest city of Pakistan, left at least 60 people dead and over 100 injured. A curfew was imposed and troops were called in to restore order. The demonstrations were called by the MQM to protest against the alleged abduction of MQM members by supporters of the ruling Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP). Qaim A. Shah resigned as Sindh Chief Minister and was replaced by another PPP member, Aftab S. Mirani. A swap of 76 rival political activists followed army-sponsored talks in Karachi to end days of political violence between supporters of the MQM and the Jaye Sindh, which demands autonomy for Sindh, the home province of Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. |
May 1990 | A curfew was imposed in Hyderabad, the second largest city of Sindh, following machine-gun battles between the Mohajirs (Muslim immigrants) and the native Sindhis. The situation deteriorated after the arrest of Qadir Magsi, a Sindhi nationalist leader. The death toll in the city reached over 80. Ethnic violence in Karachi left 13 dead including a senior MQM leader. The army was deployed in Sindh to help civilian authorities restore law and order. There were repeated allegations, which were difficult to verify, that law enforcement agencies favored the PPP followers and caused the deaths of innocents while attempting to bring the violence under control or by standing by and refusing to intervene. (State Dept. Dispatch, 02/91). The PPP denied the allegations. |
Aug 1990 | President Ghulam Khan, pursuant to his constitutional powers, dismissed the Pakistan Peoples’ Party (PPP) government of Bhutto and dissolved the national and provincial assemblies. Elections were called for respectively on October 24 and 27. A state of emergency was declared to enable the President to act in absence of the assemblies. |
Nov 1990 | Nawaz Sharif, the leader of the Islamic Democratic Alliance (IDA), has been sworn in as Prime Minister, after his right-wing coalition defeated the PPP-led opposition. |
Jan 1991 | The Hyderabad Press Club held its annual elections. Sindhi journalists boycotted it and there are now two press clubs. The government has agreed to allocate new flats in specific ethnic areas. Wounded victims of violence even attend hospitals divided along ethnic lines. During the last 5 years some 3,000 people have been killed in ethnic violence. |
Feb 1991 | 14 people have been killed and 26 others wounded in ethnic violence. The clashes were among the worst since Nawaz Sharif took office last November. |
May 1991 | At least 5 people were killed and 16 wounded by gunmen in Hyderabad, as a faction of the Jaye Sindh called for a protest strike to mark the anniversary of the arrest of the faction’s leader, Qadir Magsi. But most shops opened as usual in the city, which is dominated by Mohajir settlers. |
Sep 1991 | Three people were killed in bomb attacks during a strike in Hyderabad. Native Sindhis were protesting against the repatriation of Biharis, the so-called “stranded Pakistanis” from Bangladesh. |
Oct 1991 | Life was disrupted in parts of Sindh after a strike called by the progressive group of the Jaye Sindh Tehrik to protest the appointment of a caretaker Chief Minister, Tariq Javed, who is from the Mohajir community. Javed is replacing Jam Sadiq Ali pending his return from medical treatment in London. The MQM is a partner in the Sindh government. The strike call was not heeded in Karachi, which is dominated by the Mohajirs. |
Jan 1992 | Sindh separatist leader G.M. Syed has been put under house arrest, after his speech at a function held to celebrate his birthday challenged “the integrity of Pakistan.” As the leader of the nationalist Jaye Sindh, he supports the secession of Sindh and its establishment as a separate entity to be known as Sindhudesh. |
May 1992 | Ties between neighbors Pakistan and India slumped further when Pakistani Interior Minister told Parliament that Indian intelligence was fuelling sabotage and terrorism in the restive province of Sindh. Opposition leader Bhutto said that an army operation in Sindh should be a part of a political package for the province. Speaking in a parliamentary debate, Bhutto demanded the allocation of job quotas in the federal and provincial governments and government-controlled corporations to natives of Sindh (Reuters, 05/26/92). President Ghulam Khan ordered the army to go into Sindh to “clean up the mess”. This would be the country’s biggest campaign to control ethnic violence, abductions and other crimes that have paralyzed life in the province. |
Jun 1992 | After the first anniversary of the founding of the Jaye Sindh Progressive Party on March 21, the party has launched the second phase of its struggle, with the ultimate objective of fighting for complete independence for the province. The Jaye Sindh says its people have been suffering all forms of discrimination and brutalities at the hands of the Punjabi-dominated center. (BBC cites All-India Radio, 06/04/92). The army has accepted the blame for the deaths of nine villagers in Sindh and removed three commanders from their posts. Bhutto, who challenges the legitimacy of the state’s civilian government, said there will be no improvement in her home province until Sindhis are given their due rights (Reuters, 06/14/92). Y. Bakhtiar, the leader of the opposition in the Senate, has demanded more powers for the army in the Sindh operation. Troops have raided the offices of the government-allied MQM and begun to disarm its militants. The army launched a cleanup operation last month hoping to apprehend some 7,000 “robbers” operating from the forests of interior Sindh. The opposition had initially criticized the army for capturing only native Sindhis while ignoring other ethnic groups. |
Oct 1992 | While reporting about human resource development in the defence industry, Economic Review reports the provinces of Sindh and Baluchistan have marginal representation in the defence forces. Representation from these provinces is essential for national integration. In order to attract Sindhis and Baluchis, a number of measures have been taken. |
Jan 1993 | Pakistan took back the first batch of 300 Bihari refugees, the stranded Pakistanis from Bangladesh, after a wait of about two decades. While the beginning partly fulfills a 1990 promise by the ruling IDA to repatriate all the refugees — about 250,000 — they are reported to be far from universally welcome. Native Sindhis, championed by the opposition PPP, see them as a part of a long-running conspiracy by the Punjabi-dominated Islamabad government to further swamp the southern province with outsiders. Already the native Sindhis are a minority in their own province, particularly in the major urban centers. Conscious of Sindhi sensibilities, the government has promised to house the refugees in the eastern province of Punjab. But few doubt that any fresh influx of Biharis, like their million-plus ethnic kinfolk who have illegally spirited their way into Karachi in the past five years, will eventually gravitate towards Sindh’s urban centers (The Guardian, 01/11/93). Army troops were called in to patrol the streets of the southern Sindh cities of Karachi and Hyderabad, to avert a possible ethnic backlash in the wake of four bomb blasts that left 30 people dead and over 100 wounded in Hyderabad. Rival ethnic groups called for protests against the bombings. Political leaders including Mrs. Benazir Bhutto condemned the government’s failure to maintain law and order. No one has claimed responsibility for the killings, but police suspect the Jaye Sindh, a nationalist group opposed to the immigration of Urdu-speaking Biharis from Bangladesh (AFP, 01/25/93). |
Mar 1993 | The Pakistan government has warned officials in all 4 provinces to take precautionary measures against possible terrorist attacks following a rash of explosions in Bombay that have killed nearly 300 and wounded more than 1,000 people. The government of Sindh, regarded as Pakistan’s soft-belly because of its long border with India, declared Karachi and several other districts as “sensitive areas” and sent additional forces to remain on alert. Pakistan and India regularly accuse each other of helping terrorists like Muslims in Kashmir against India, or nationalist forces in Sindh against Pakistan. |
Apr 1993 | The Federal Minister of Defence Production Mir Bijrani announced his resignation from the cabinet. In his resignation letter, he cited the indifference of the coalition Prime Minister Sharif towards issues like stemming ethnic violence in Sindh, the apprehension of the native Sindhis toward the repatriation of Biharis from Bangladesh, and under-representation of rural Sindhis in the federal services (Middle East Intelligence Report, 04/11/93). President Ghulam Khan dismissed the Sharif government and dissolved the Parliament in view of conflicts over power sharing between him and the Prime Minister. |
May 1993 | The MQM called for a boycott of the on-going provincial elections to protest the May 1 killing of an MQM leader. The party had long antagonized native Sindhis with its strong pro-Islamabad line. However, it broke away from the coalition government of Nawaz Sharif following an army crackdown on the MQM last June. The Supreme Court restored the Sharif government and the Parliament. However, the verdict did not end the crisis. The two sides instead have expanded their battle into a political control of the provinces. |
Jul 1993 | The President, Prime Minister and Army Chief held a meeting in a last-ditch effort to avoid using the army to solve the country’s crippling political crisis. The opposition led by Mrs. Bhutto had asked the army to remove Sharif and arrange for new elections within 90 days. Bhutto cooperated last year when the army launched an operation against outlaws in her native Sindh. This helped the army improve its relations with the Sindhis, perceived as anti-army since 1979 when Bhutto’s father, Z. A. Bhutto, a native Sindhi Prime Minister, was hung for his alleged involvement in a political murder. |
Oct 1993 | Benazir Bhutto has returned to power for the second time after three years in the political wilderness. Her PPP captured 86 seats in comparison to 72 by Sharif’s party in the National Assembly of 207 seats. Ms. Bhutto also strengthened her hold on Punjab, the richest and most populous province, and with allies, formed provincial governments in Punjab and Sindh. |
Dec 1993 | Massive demonstrations organized by the Jaye Sindh Student Federation were held in several cities in Sindh in protest against the continued detention of M.G. Syed, the leader of the Sindh separatist organizations — the Jaye Sindh Movement and the Sindh National Alliance. The Jaye Sindh Progressive Party Chairman Dr. K. Makhti has asked Islamabad to stop the on-going anti-Sindhi operation launched by the army in the province (BBC cites All-India Radio, 12/17/93). |
Jan 1994 | Arrangements for a forthcoming census March 26 to April 7) have been finalized. The former Sharif government started the process in 1991, but abandoned it half-way when a controversy arose in Sindh about the exaggeration of household numbers. In Sindh two major ethnic communities — Sindhis and Mohajirs — are engaged in a battle of claims and counterclaims about their population ratios. Both reject the existing census figures as totally off the mark (Economic Review, Pakistan, 01/94). |
Mar 1994 | Leaders of the Indian community in Manila have urged the Philippine government to stop immigration officers from extorting money from Filipinos of Indian origin and other immigrants residing in the country. There are about 20,000 Indians in the Philippines — most of whom are Sindhis, who fled from Pakistan after the partition of the subcontinent in 1947. |
Jun 1994 | A Pakistani court sentenced the entire leadership of the MQM to 27 years in prison each for kidnapping and torturing a military intelligence officer. The prosecution claimed that on the orders of MQM leader Altaf Hussain, his supporters kidnapped and severely beat up Major Kaleem and his 4 assistants in June 1991. Hussain went into exile in London more than two years ago. He is the leader of about 10 million Mohajirs who live in the major urban centers of Sindh. |
Oct 1994 | The leader of the MQM, Altaf Hussain, has asked his followers if they favor the division of Sindh and the creation of a separate Mohajir province. Hussain’s statements from his exile in London, have angered Sindhis in the province. One Sindhi newspaper has accused the US of helping the MQM create another Hong Kong in the heartland of Pakistan. Sindhi nationalist parties have uniformly condemned Mr. Hussain as a traitor and an Indian agent bent on destroying the country. In rural Sindh, Sindhis have begun to arm themselves. In the 109 seat Sindh Provincial Assembly, the MQM has 27 urban seats which has deepened the urban-rural divide (Daily Telegraph, 10/07/94). A scheduled population census has been abruptly postponed by the Pakistani government in response to ethnic rivalries and hostility from provincial authorities. The census was scheduled to begin on October 23; however, the federal government has begun a nationwide enumeration of housing units in preparation for the census. The last official census was taken in Pakistan in 1981. Punjabis feel that the census would be unfair to them as they fear that other provinces might inflate their populations to obtain more federal funds (Punjab is estimated to hold 60% of the country’s population). In Sindh, native-Sindhi speakers and the Mohajirs claim to outnumber each other. The Baluchis felt the census should be postponed until the Afghan refugees are repatriated (Agence France Presse, 10/19/94). |
Dec 1994 | The withdrawal of the army from Karachi three weeks ago has led to an eruption of unprecedented violence. The army pullout ends a 29 month operation that had come under harsh criticism from human rights activists for its excesses against civilians. Police and paramilitary forces appear unable to stop the violence which has led to the deaths of over 90 officers and more than 750 civilians this year. Prime Minister Bhutto has agreed to open talks with the MQM. The violence involves four different conflicts between the Sindhis and Mohajirs, various factions of the Mohajirs, rival criminal gangs, and the Sunnis and Shias (Times Newspapers Ltd., 12/21/94; Financial Times, 12/28/94). The violence has also led to increased tensions between India and Pakistan. The Pakistani government alleges that the violence has been fomented by Indian agents. This has led to the closure of the Indian consulate in Karachi and the expulsion by both countries of two diplomats (Times Newspapers Ltd., 12/21/94; Financial Times, 12/28/94). |
Jan 1995 | The Sindh government is reported to have offered close to $500,000 in “head money” for sixteen suspects, including eight MQM leaders who are accused of capital crimes. The move comes on the heels of the deployment of elite Pakistani army units in Karachi. Some 160 people were killed in Karachi last December due to battles among various groups (see above). Karachi’s Mohajir community is embittered over alleged discrimination in employment and university admissions. There is only one Mohajir minister in the Sindhi-dominated provincial government. Native Sindhis are upset because they believe that the fruits of economic development policies are largely received by immigrant-dominated cities in the province (Asiaweek, 01/13/95). |
Apr 1995 | The head of the Jaye Sindh movement, G.M. Syed, has died. The Jaye Sindh has been seeking a separate “Sindudesh” homeland in the province. It has a strong following in rural areas and among the intelligentsia, but has not been able to gain enough support to win an election. Syed, who was 92, had been under house arrest for the past three years and was facing treason charges before a Karachi court. He died in a Karachi hospital after being in a coma for 39 days. Syed began his campaign for a separate Sindh state in the 1930s when he sought to divide Sindh from Bombay province (Reuters, 04/25/95). |
Jun 1995 | At least 17 people were killed in Karachi as violence erupted over the alleged gang rape of a Mohajir girl. The girl has identified her main attacker as a local leader of the Pakistan People’s Party. For the past two months, Karachi has suffered from another wave of violence that daily results in the deaths of 5 to 10 people. The latest violence follows the call for a protest by the MQM. It has spread to other Mohajir-dominated towns in the province. (UPI, 06/23/95). |
Jul 1995 | The federal government has issued 21 conditions in its talks with the MQM in response to the 18 points earlier put forward by the Mohajir movement. Among these points, the government has asked the MQM to give up what it calls a “policy of ethnic cleansing” and the targeting of other ethnic groups such as Punjabis, Sindhis, Pashtuns, and Baluchis. In the past, powerful Sindhi politicians have sabotaged talks between the government and the MQM. So far, over 1000 people have been killed in Karachi in battles between militants and police/paramilitary troops. 334 people were killed last month alone. It is unclear from reports how many of those killed are Sindhis (Daily Telegraph, 07/07/95 & 07/13/95). |
Aug 1995 | In Karachi on August 2, the bodies of 12 people were found in a mini-bus while six others were killed in attacks by unidentified gunmen. The twelve people in the bus were reported to be Punjabis and Sindhis. The police believe they were kidnapped and murdered by MQM activists who suspected they were police informants. On August 24, four Sindhis were reported dead in Karachi as a two-day strike called by the MQM turned violent (Reuters, 08/03/95; Reuters, 08/24/95). |
Dec 1995 | The consulates of Britain, France, Italy, and Saudi Arabia are closing their doors in Karachi after receiving violent threats from extremists. The consulates will be reopened in Lahore. Pakistani authorities indicate that the threats are part of an international network of terrorists who were also behind the recent bombing of the Egyptian embassy in Islamabad. (UPI, 12/19/95). It is estimated that about 2000 people were killed in Karachi in 1995 as a result of criminal and ethnic warfare. This makes 1995 the bloodiest year since 1988 when Karachi first became the site of large-scale violence between the Mohajirs and government forces/other ethnic groups. Meanwhile, talks continue between the Bhutto government and the MQM (Inter Press Service, 01/05/96). |
Jan 1996 | Nine people, including four activists of the Mohajir Qaumi Movement (MQM) were killed in different parts of Karachi, leading some political observers to warn of possible ethnic riots in the Sindhi and Mohair communities. Earlier that week, 17 people including two army captains and three other security officials were shot dead by unidentified militants. The victims, including the officers and other law enforcement personnel were kidnapped and killed by militants and their bodies placed in a stolen van found in Liaquatabad, a district of Karachi. Police believed the killers were members of the Naim Sheri terrorist group of the MQM.. Most of the victims were Sindhis. (United Press International 1/2/96) |
Feb 1996 | The chairman of Jeay Sindh, Dr Qadir Magsi accused the government of siphoning off Sindhi wealth from oil, gas, granite, coal and the sea port and neglecting the industrial sector, while spending most of the development budget on defence forces. He also alleged that the Sindhis were excluded from all major institutions. He said Sindhis would demand the right of secession if their national and political rights were not recognized. (British Broadcasting Corporation 2/13/96). Four people including a police officer were killed in different parts of Karachi. A Mohajir Quami Movement, or MQM, activist was killed in a shootout with police, while another person was killed when an unidentified gunman opened fire on his car, and a passerby died after being caught in the crossfire between police and MQM gunmen. The government of Benazir Bhutto, a native Sindhi, repeatedly blamed the MQM for continued violent attacks in Karachi. But the group has denied fomenting violence, and says it has been the victim of assaults by the police and the paramilitary forces. (United Press International 2/19/96) |
Apr 1996 | A strike by the opposition Mohajir Qaumi Movement (MQM) to protest recent police killing of six militants paralysed Karachi. At the same time, a crowd of about 250 people staged a demonstration against the strike outside the MQM office in the party stronghold of Azizabad. The demonstrators held the banner of Sindh Ittehad Tehrik (SIT) and were heavily protected by police. Some 2,700 people have been killed in the political violence in the city during the past 15 months, 250 of them since the start of the new year. (Deutsche Presse-Agentur 4/3/96) |
Sep 1996 | Murtaza Bhutto, brother of the Prime Minister, was murdered, prompting a violent rampage in Sindh province. The 10 party opposition alliance, which included the Pakistan Muslim League of former prime minister Nawaz Sharif and the powerful Mohajir Qaumi Movement (MQM) believed that the government, rather than traditional ethnic rivalries, was responsible for his death. Leaders and supporters of Murtaza’s faction of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), known as the PPP-Shaheed Bhutto group, announced a 10 day period of mourning. (Agence France Presse 9/25/96) |
Oct 1996 | An opposition Mohajir Qaumi Movement (MQM) deputy told a court she was “forced to change loyalty” when she defected to government ranks last month. Feroza Begum, the MQM’s only woman deputy in the provincial Sindh assembly, took an oath as a minister in the Sindh government on September 11, shortly after her son Osama Qadri was arrested on charges of terrorism. (Agence France Presse 10/24/96) |
Nov 1996 | Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto was removed from office amid charges that her husband had been illegally profiting from government contracts and that she had failed to stop numerous killings throughout the country. The dismissal caused considerable celebration throughout the country, especially by the MQM in Karachi. (Agence France Presse 11/5/96) |
Feb 1997 | In national elections, Benazir Bhutto’s PPP won only 17 seats in the Parliament, and not even a majority in Sindh province. Bhutto claimed the elections were fraudulent. She said the Supreme Court verdict upholding her dismissal delivered just four days before the polling was timed to influence the elections. (Deutsche Presse-Agentur 2/4/97) |
Jun 1997 | Pir Mazharul Haq, a provincial deputy opposition leader and former minister of the PPP, was kidnapped near the city of Hyderabad. Chief minister Liaqat Jatio’s government initially believed the kidnapping had been staged so that Haq could avoid corruption charges from his 1993-96 tenure as minister for law, parliamentary affairs and town planning in the PPP’s Sindh provincial government. The government’s initial reluctance to investigate the matter led PPP activists to demonstrate in Karachi. (Deutsche Presse-Agentur 6/19/97) |
Jul 1997 | After the Karachi power corporation chief, Malik Shahid Hamid was shot dead, Karachi police arrested over 500 political activists, including members of the PPP and MQM. (Agence France Presse 7/7/97) |
Aug 1997 | Violence in Karachi killed the head of a hospital, a newspaper vendor, an activist from the MQM and one from Jeay Sindh Mahaz. (Agence France Presse 8/10/97) |
Nov 1997 | At least three people were killed in fierce gunbattles in eastern Karachi. Police linked the deaths to continuing rivalry between activists of Jeay Sindh, the Muttehida Qaumi Movement (MQM) of Urdu-speaking settlers and its splinter faction. (Agence France Presse 11/10/97) |
Dec 1997 | Farooq Ahmad Khan Leghari resigned as president of Pakistan. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif appointed a Punjabi, Muhammad Rafiq Tarar, to replace him, leading Benazir Bhutto to claim that other provinces in Pakistan were being deprived and the federation was being weakened. Tarar was later denied the opportunity to run by the election commission. (Deutsche Presse-Agentur 12/10/97 & 12/18/97) |
Mar 1998 | Pakistan completed its first census in 18 years. The census had been controversial. Among others, the Sindhis had resisted it, because they feared it would lead to a decrease in their political power in favor of the Mohajirs, who had grown due to immigration and population growth. (Inter Press Service 3/15/98) |
Jun 1998 | The ANP joined with the PPP and several other parties to protest the proposed construction of a hydroelectric dam in NWFP. The dam was expected to produce over 3,600 megawatts electricity by damming the river Indus, but the ANP said it would submerge vast areas within a hundred kilometer radius of the proposed site. The proposal had languished for thirty years due to fierce opposition, but Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif had announced he would build it regardless of the protests. (Deutsche Presse-Agentur 6/12/98). Major markets and shops were shut and public transport was off the roads in the cities of Hyderabad, Sukkur, Larkana, Mirpurkhas and Nawabshah as part of a Sindhi-led strike to protest the proposed Kalabagh dam project. All the major Sindi parties opposed the project, which they said would deprive Sindh of irrigation water and damage its environment, and that the government was ignoring the needs of non-Punjabis. (Agence France Presse 6/17/97) |
Sep 1998 | Nine people were arrested on the charge of hoisting the Indian national flag on three buildings in Sindh and Hyderabad. (The Statesman (India) 9/9/98) |
Oct 1998 | A nationalist conference of Sindhis, Pashtuns, Balochs and Seraikis in Pakistan resolved to stand united against the domination of Punjabis and threatened that Pakistan might collapse if they were not given equal rights. The event marked the launch of the Pakistan Oppressed Nations Movement (PONM). The conference issued a joint statement in which Pakistan was described as a ” multinational country” comprising five nations of Punjabis, Sindhis, Balochs, Pashtuns and Seraikis and demanded that all of them should be autonomous and sovereign. (British Broadcasting Corporation 10/4/98). The Pakistani government suspended the provincial assembly in the troubled Sindh province and placed the region under direct federal rule. Prime Minister Sharif said in a televised speech that the decision had been taken to curb lawlessness and fight terrorism in Sindh. (Agence France Presse 10/30/98) |
Nov 1998 | Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif set up special military courts in Sindh province to try people accused of terrorism, murders and other serious crimes in an attempt to reduce the violence in Karachi, where over 1,000 people had been murdered in one year. The PPP and the MQM both condemned the move, which they said “marks the complete erosion of civil authority and constitutional rule.” (Agence France Presse 11/20/98) |
Feb 1999 | The PPP and MQM began their appeal in the Pakistani Supreme Court, charging that there was no justification for the creation of military courts in Sindh province. The Supreme court agreed, ruling that “military courts for the trial of civilians” were “unconstitutional, without lawful authority and of no legal effect.” (Agence France Presse 2/1/99 and Financial Times (London) 2/18/99) |
Apr 1999 | A Karachi court found Benazir Bhutto guilty of corruption, prompting protests and a strike by her PPP, which claimed that she was the victim of a political conspiracy. The strike -banned under the direct federal rule of Sindh imposed in October 1998 – led to the arrest of 100 PPP members. While the strike continued across most of Sindh province, it was not noticeable in Karachi, where the Mohajirs made up the majority. (Agence France Presse 4/15/99 & 4/17/99) |
May 1999 | The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) appealed to the army and the judiciary to intervene on behalf of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto and her husband for alleged government persecution. Syed Khurshid Shah and Naveed Qamar, two leaders of PPP, rejected a police report that Bhutto’s husband, Senator Asif Zardari, injured himself on neck and head while trying to commit suicide during police interrogation and that Zardari, still in police custody, had not been moved to a hospital as ordered by the Sindh High Court. Zardari was under investigation for two murders. Bhutto later alleged that her husband did not attempt suicide, but had been tortured in a secret security agency operated by Prime Minister Sharif. (Japan Economic Newswire 5/18/99 and Inter Press Service 5/19/99) |
Aug 1999 | Amid growing threats of a mass movement by the opposition, the government declared “internal disturbance” through “illegal” strikes, go-slows or lock-outs as “terrorist acts.” An opposition leader alleged the government’s latest move was part of its plan to crush the general strike called by Pakistan People’s Party and Muttahida Qaumi Movement on 4 September in Sindh and Karachi and similar plans by other parties in the first week of next month. Authorities had launched a crackdown on the PPP and MQM by arresting hundreds of their leaders and workers in a bid to stall the proposed strike call against the recently-imposed 15 per cent general sales tax. The PPP claimed that 400 of its workers were taken into custody. (The Statesman [India] 8/28/99). Bhutto denounced a citizen’s move to unseat a provincial high court judge on the grounds that he is a Hindu. Bhutto said she suspected the move against Justice Bhagwan Das of the Sindh High Court was aimed at precluding him from becoming chief justice of that court. She said Sharif’s regime had never appointed a member of a minority to the superior judiciary. (Deutsche Presse-Agentur 8/31/99). More than 1,000 Pakistani political activists from the PPP and MQM were detained in a week-long crackdown on anti-government protests in Karachi and Hyderabad. Police officials said the crackdown was part of “preventive” measures to maintain law and order. They added the planned strikes by the MQM and PPP for Sept. 4 were illegal. City police chief Farooq Amin Qureshi told AFP that 683 people, including 291 from the PPP and 179 from the MQM, had been detained in Karachi alone during the week. (Agence France Presse 9/1/99) |
Sep 1999 | Karachi and Hyderabad virtually shut down in response to strikes declared by the PPP and MQM against a sales tax imposed by the central government. (Agence France Presse 9/4/99). Police detained most of the leadership of the PPP and MQM after a public rally which was broken up by police using tear gas and batons. In response, the combined opposition (of 19 political parties) called a strike to protest the increasingly militaristic tactics of the Sharif government. That strike, in turn, generated another 50 arrests and a call for a hunger strike. (Agence France Presse 9/11/99 & 9/12/99) |
Oct 1999 | The Pakistani Army staged a bloodless coup, removing Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, and placing Gen. Pervez Musharraf in charge of the country. |
Feb 2000 | The World Sindhi Institute (WSI) issued a statement protesting U.S. President Clinton’s decision to visit Pakistan. WSI appealed to him to address certain critical issues facing Pakistan, including the need for decentralization and the “colonization” of non-Punjabis. (U.S. Newswire 2/10/2000) |
Apr 2000 | The military government announced plans for the devolution of central government power to the local levels. The plan would include direct party-less elections at union (village) and district levels. Elected institutions at the two levels have special reserved seats for women, farmers and vulnerable groups. However, Sindhis and other groups remained skeptical for several reasons. Firstly, some said it reminded them of plans pushed under previous dictatorships which only served to increase centralization. Secondly, Sindhis feared it would overrule the autonomy given to Sindh province. Thirdly, many groups said they wanted a return to democracy before any other changes in government took place. (Inter Press Service 4/12/00). The BBC reported that the Pakistani government initiated steps to break up the foreign network of religious, regional, and ethnic organizations. According to sources, intelligence agencies all over Pakistan began collecting statistics about organizations involved in fanning regional prejudice, sparking ethnic riots, and carrying out terrorism acts and sabotage by inciting religious sentiments, including information about their funding. The sources note that in the past these organizations have sparked ethnic riots in Karachi; created disturbances in Quetta and Peshawar on regional and linguistic grounds; and caused sectarian violence on the basis of religion in Punjab, Sindh, and NWFP [North-West Frontier Province]. (British Broadcasting Corporation 4/20/00). |