Author: admin

  • PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS BY JAMSHED N.R. MEHTA 18 APRIL 1919

    SIND PRIVINCIAL CONFERENCE

    6th Session, Jacobabad

    PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS BY JAMSHED N.R. MEHTA

    18 APRIL 1919

    Presidential Address by JAMSHED N.R. MEHTA on the eve of

    Mr. Chairman and Members of the Reception Committee, Brother and Sister Delegates and friends.

    I thank you one and all for having done me the honour of electing me as President of the Sixth Sind Provincial Conference in this City of Jacobabad. My thanks to you consist of few words, because I cannot express what I feel.

    We meet here today to deliberate on National and Provincial questions and pass resolutions to guide our future course to serve our Motherland: there can be no greater happiness or joy than to serve own dear Land and I humbly bow to the Almighty and our Devas for giving us this opportunity to meet and speak for the Holy cause of our Nation, to unite in one bond for one purpose, vis. SWARAJ FOR OUR BHARAT DESH.

    Friends, when I think that it is only a few years ago that I have entered the arena of political life, I do feel my unworthiness to take up the responsible duty you have entrusted me with, today. I take it up since you so will it, and offer myself to Him to guide me aright and look to you to help me in the discharge of that duty. May I be worthy of your choice.

    At such meetings my first thoughts do go to our leaders-past and present, at whose feet we have begun to learn lessons of self-Government and Self-Determination; let us send our thoughts of reverence and love to all of them, those noble patriots and pioneers who have paved for us the way for service to our Motherland.

     

    Self-Government and Self-Determination

    The foremost ideals and demands of ours are Self-Government and Self-Determination; the air of Bharat Desh is surcharged and electrified with this powerful idea. Our assemblies, our meetings, our actions, words, feelings, our ways of living, our daily steps, all make us to move forward towards these goals and we are willing to offer all our happiness, joy, peace and whatever that is good and valuable in life to this shrine of SWARAJ, Self-Government, Self-Determination, call it what you will. It is but reasonable that I should deal with this topic first.

    We feel that Swaraj of Self-Government is our Birth Right; we feel that the present system of Government is unsuitable for India and Indians; we feel that the present constitution of the Government is extremely costl and a great burden on our Land. We also know that the present administration is autocratic and selfish. We intensely feel the hardship, burden and injustice of unequal treatment accorded to sons of our land in comparison with the treatment given to the sons of other lands in our own Home; and we see in consequence that our Land is being continually drained of its wealth and resources and reduced to improve; we want therefore a change in the system and constitution of the Government as at present existing. We want to exercise our right as Indians, as the sons of this soil to self determine what type of constitutional Government within the British Empire will suit the condition and needs of our country.

    Since 1886, our veteran leaders have been constantly pointing out to our rulers how India has suffered in all aspects of its life by the methods of administration by Great Britain, that had grown unsuited to the fast changing needs of the times- but they spoke and cried in vain. In the year 1906, the Dada of India gave out his holy pronouncement that Swaraj must henceforth be our goal and that we must look to it as the one way to relive India from its sufferings and since then the cry of Swaraj has spread to every corner of our dear land; every year our demands grew firmer and stronger; side by side, the reactionary measures of the officials calculated to prevent our aspirations from taking proper shape also grew stronger. The struggle went on. Constant efforts were made by subtle means to divide and widen the gulf between Hindus and Moslems; certain persons were made official favourites to form a Government party. Measures to suppress National papers and gag those that propagated liberal views taken; needle reforms and measures for the good of India in spite of all popular demands were not introduced, with the result a most unfortunate result, that today in India, we find the public and Government as two distinct parties, as if the interests of the two are separate and opposite. Friends, it is no pleasure to me to make these statements. To me, and I am sure, to you all this state of affairs is unwelcome and painful. Well, this struggle continued, and it became a subject of constant anxiety to several thoughtful leaders of our Land. It was apparent that such a state of affairs could not last long and could do good to no one; a scheme was thought out by our leaders for improving the system of Government, ultimately leading to self-government within the British Empire. That scheme is well known to you as the Congress-League scheme; this scheme if accepted by the Government would have had the result to bring about some satisfaction until the final goal was reached by the people of a nation that aspired and struggled for liberty, justice and equality. Practically the whole of India accepted this scheme as the immediate step towards the goal of self-government; the state of affairs reached to an anxious stage owing to the righteous impatience of the people on one hand to be free and the desire of Government officials on the other hand to muzzle the people. At last one who represented the King Emperor realized the gravity of the situation and invited the Secretary of State for India, to visit our land personally and to judge the situation; the great war was raging, our land was “Hanm-Sharik” with our Emperor and his allies in all the battle-fields and our soldiers fought on all the four continents of the world. The Secretary of State, the Right Hon’ble Mr. Montagu, whom India had always known and accepted as a friend, came to India soon after the announcement of the 20th August 1917 that responsible Government as an integral part of the British Government was the goal of British Rule in India. The Viceroy and the Secretary of Sate after prolonged consultation of all shades of opinion in India and careful consideration of the views placed before them issued a report containing suggestions for Reforms; it was apparent that the report bore evident indications of the influences of those who were against Indian Rights and aspirations. The report rejected the Congress League Scheme and suggested quite a different scheme, which almost all in India pronounced with one voice as inadequate to meet Indian aspirations. Yet there were a few leaders who took the view that the reforms suggested by Lord Chelmsford and Mr. Montagu were an advance on the present system and though inadequate to meet our demands they ought to be welcomed and if need be accepted as a first instalment. But a large majority- and a very large majority declared at the Special Congress in Bombay that the scheme was inadequate, unsatisfactory and disappointing. They however did not reject the scheme, but demanded several substantial modifications while adhering to its principal frame works. The main modifications demanded were that in the Provincial Governments all subjects except departments of law, police, and justice, should be immediately transferred to popular control, the above three subjects being reserved to executive Government, only for a period of six years; and that in the Central Government, all departments except foreign affairs (excepting relations with the colonies and dominions), army, navy, and relations with Indian Ruling Princes, and subject to the declaration of rights given below, matters directly affecting public peace, tranquility, and defence of the country, should be transferred to popular control as the immediate step towards responsible Government. The Declaration of Rights which in view of its great importance deserves to be put before the public as often as possible reads thus:-

     

    (Declaration of Indian Rights)

     

    RESOLUTION IV:- The Government of India shall have undivided administrative authority on matters directly concerning peace, tranquility and defence of the country subject to the following:-

    That the Statue to be passed by Parliament should include the Declaration of the Rights of the People of India as British Citizens:-

    a. That all Indian Subjects of His Majesty and all the subjects naturalized who are resident in India are equal before the law, and there shall be no penal nor administrative law in force in this country, whether substantive or procedural of discriminative nature,

    b. that no Indian subject of His Majesty shall be liable to suffer in liberty, life, property, or in respect of free speech or writing, or of the right of association, except under sentence by an ordinary Court of Justice, and as a result of lawful and open trial

    c. that every Indian subject shall be entitled to bear arms, subject to the purchase of a license, as in Great Britain, and that right shall not be taken away save by a sentence of ordinary Court of Justice;

    d. that the Press shall be free, and that no license nor security shall be demanded on the registration of a press or a newspaper;

    e. that corporal punishment shall not be inflicted on any Indian subject of His Majesty save under conditions applying equally to all other British subjects.

     

    The wisdom of Providence however moved us onwards. The great war suddenly came to an end. We were victorious and our Empire loudly proclaimed that the battle was won for the freedom of all nations; that it was a war won to give the right of self determination to every nation, weak or strong. That it was a war which decided and proved that Right ruled over might. These loud proclamations of Britain and its Allies gave more vigour to India’ demands. Side by side with these India’s demands, a party opposed to Indian reforms, under the leadership of Lord Sydenham, carried on highly mischievous campaign against Indian Aspiration; During the interval of a few months between the Special Session of the Congress at Bombay held in August last, and the 33rd Sessions of the Congress at Delhi in December, the Indian Members of the Bombay Legislative Council declared that they were ready for full provincial autonomy viz. that all departments of provincial government be transferred to popular control of Legislative Councils. This declaration and the increased opposition of officials to reforms and some acts of high handed bureaucratic policy between August and December 1918 made the 33rd Sessions of the Congress to demand full Provincial Autonomy for all Provinces of India. Some leaders demanded this firmly, specially pointing out that the department of Police must be brought under popular control immediately, and that it would be ruinous to keep it longer under the control of autocratic executives as a provincial reserved subject. It was clear that the main reason for this demand, contrary to the resolution of the Congress only three months before, was due to extreme dissatisfaction at the administration of the police department. Friends, I do believe that the whole responsibility for the present situation in India lies with this department of police. It has been truly a horror to the people; its actions, ways and means are a good deal responsible for creating acute feelings against the present system of Government; instead of affording protection, it, as it stands, is a menace to our property, person and honour. The germs of sedition and anarchy which we see sprouting occasionally in a few individuals in India and which we whole heartedly condemn is undoubtedly the result of police oppression which has become unbearable. Measures to reform the police will be far more effective, in my opinion to kill sedition, than those suggested by the Rowlatt Commission and the “Black Bills”. It is first necessary to remove the roots of a rotten tree- in this case the harsh conduct and injudicious activities of the police. There may by and are exceptions, as I do not class all members of the Police alike, but what I have said above applies to both Indians and non Indians. If only efforts were made to make the Indian police, even one-tenth as good as the police in England, how much more happy would India be today! How much more smooth would be the relations between people and the Government; I earnestly hope that this aspect of the question will receive the earnest consideration of all concerned.

    I feel I ought to lay before you some of the main views and arguments which were responsible for the difference of opinions and the division of the house at our last Session of Congress in Delhi.

    There, some of our leaders gave out their views which were accepted by a minority (and I was one of the minority) that a sounder and practical aspect of the present political situation did not make it advisable to demand immediately all departments as transferred to the Reformed Legislative Councils in all provinces of India for the reasons:

    That the demand of full autonomy and the insistence of its grant would prejudice the chances of securing substantial modification in the Central Government. That even if full provincial autonomy were granted the Central Government could transfer to itself any department out of the control of the Provincial Government, and thus baffle all plans of popular control. This sudden change in our demand would mean a stronger opposition from those opposed to reforms. That this demand might also alienate from us our best friends in Britain because full provincial autonomy for all provinces means practically the rejection of the Montagu-Chelmsford Scheme of Reforms. Also for sake of unity between leaders in India, viz, those of the moderate party and the advanced party, it was necessary and advisable to stick to resolutions agreed upon at the Special Congress at Bombay.

    Such of our moderate friends as attended the Delhi Congress also expressed the view which practically meant that they regarded the Montagu-Chelmsford Scheme of Reforms as not adequate but they were prepared to accept it as such and welcome it, and press for more reforms.

    Thus there were three distinct opinions expressed at the Congress. I personally do not see the least objection to such difference of opinion. Let us remember after all that as far as most of the essentials are concerned all parties do agree. Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya in his Presidential address at Delhi stated that the Moderate Conference, the Indian National Conference, and the Moslem League agreed in asking for certain essential modifications and improvements in the scheme: he said:-

    “It has thus become as clear as noon-day light that enlightened Indian Public opinion is unanimous in urging that the principle of responsible government should be introduced in the Government of India simultaneously with a similar reform in the Provinces and that there should be a division of functions in the Central Government into reserved and transferred as a part of the first instalment of reforms. It is unanimous in urging that half the number of the members of the Council of State should be elected. It is unanimous in urging that Indians should constitute one-half of the Executive Government in India. It is unanimous in asking that the popular houses should elect their presidents and vice-Presidents. It is unanimous in requiring that the elective majority should be four-fifths; and that the reserved list should be as small and the transferred list as large possible. It is unanimous in asking that ministers should be placed on a footing of prefect equality with the members of the Executive Council. It is unanimous in asking for a complete separation of judicial from executive functions. It is unanimous in urging that 50 percent of the posts in the Indian Civil Service, and to start with, 25 percent of the King’s commission in army, should be secured to Indians and that adequate provision for training them should be made in the country itself. It is unanimous in urging that the ordinary constitutional rights, such as freedom of the press and public meetings and open judicial trials, should be safeguarded, though there is a difference of opinion about the methods suggested to secure the end. I have not attempted and exhaustive enumeration. My object here is to show that there is, not withstanding difference over unimportant matters and not withstanding all that we hear of divisions and parties, practical unanimity in the country about the most essential changes and improvements which are needed in the proposals of reform.” Friends, since on these important points, there is agreement, there should be no objection to all parties working in concert for these modifications. Opinions may and do differ on other points and each individual or each party may certainly and shall have the liberty to work for its own special demands but where we unite in opinions we must also work unitedly. The present time is the time and opportunity. The reform bill is soon to be represented to the Parliament. The very world politics indicates compromise. Compromise does not mean giving up efforts for future progress or binding ourselves for life to any agreement that we may come to. For years past we have been putting forward our demands; now has come the time for action when the need for being practical is essential. Much depends upon how we can influence the members of the Parliament and the Committees in England, and I plead for a balanced mind. Enthusiasm and hunger for Self-Government is one thing and the recognition of the political side of things is another. We are now in a situation in which our internal differences would mean opportunities lost for a long time. If we differ between ourselves in a way as to cut off friendship, refuse tolerance, forget gratefulness, reverence and respect because of difference of opinions, where shall we be? If we are coming to that stage of National life, I would say friends, “Halt”. As far as differences of opinion and different parties are concerned, I am not the least alarmed; differences exist everywhere and must exist in the Congress also; on important points and essentials we fortunately agree but even if we differ widely where is the harm? From difference of views if rightly discussed and handled we grow and advance. We may form parties but not factions.

    The Indian National Congress has a wide platform. It inspires all with one aim, viz. Self-Government for our Mother Land; I feel sure it is watched and protected by Devas and Great Souls and it will and can never break down against any and all outside opposition as long as we have the good of our country in our heart. We shall be loyal to our Congress even though we differ. Let us have tolerance and forbearance and right shall come up triumphant out of all differences and struggles. If we prove that we have sufficient strength of love for our dear land and are able to sink personal differences and look only to our Motherland, the power of the Almighty shall always be behind us to protect and guide us and our sacrifices and efforts shall never be in vain and our day shall come nearer. Amen.

     

    Within British Empire

    My Friends, some words on this subject are essential. India’s ancient civilizations, its past glorious times, its great achievements in all departments of life, always fill us with pride and we consider it a blessing to be born on Indian soil in Bharatbhumi. But we cannot afford to live only on the glory of the past; considering our present, I feel that the advent of the British in our Land was arranged for by the Wisdom of the Providence, and I believe that the Almighty God has a plan of evolution thus bringing the East and the West so close. Though the plan has not been yet fulfilled, though we have been together for over a hundred and fifty years, because of limitations of our human nature we should not despair. Let us strive firmly and try to bring about a closer unity between England and India. I am one of those who are convinced that whatever be India’s past glory and England’s present prosperity, India’s salvation in this age lies in its connection with England and that of England with India, that the one without the other will be helpless and that without each other’s help God’s plan of a great Aryan civilization would fail. For the vast continent of India stretches into the Indian ocean with one arm extended towards the near East and the other towards the far East, possessing geographically such a favourable central position, that it already forms they key-stone of the British Empire; and when India ceases to be the great dependency that it is now and becomes a partner and an equal partner in that Empire, that Empire bids fair to become world Empire. That is the prospect that stands out before us. If rulers were wise this prospect would become speedy of realization to the mutual benefit of England and India and of the world at large. Not with standing all that I know and feel about the autocracy of the present system of Government in India and our suffering resulted therefrom, there is also much for us to feel thankful and grateful to them. Ideals of self-government and self-determination which we aspire to win have been evolved within us in the present generation by connection with Englishmen. The claim for freedom and liberty that we cherish have grown within us because we see what freedom and liberty have done in their lands. A good deal of pioneering work in many developments in our land has been done by them and some valuable lives of theirs have been given for and in India in the last hundred years and more:-

    The admirable virtues of England’s sons and daughters and of those of the dominions, during the war i.e. firm will, extreme patriotism, capacity to suffer, willingness to give up their lives and possessions, burning love for their country must appeal strongly to our minds and we must feel proud to belong to this Empire.

    In the last war, friends, our land has sacrificed thousands of lives for Britain and has made several other sacrifices too numerous to be stated and all these have not been done in vain. Sacrifice of blood and life must bring by natural laws the giver and the one for whom it is given more close in the firm bond of love, friendship and unity. And if we therefore are desirous of treading the most natural path- the path traced by the loving hands of God- let us try in our political field of work for unity between England and India to gain liberty and equality or Self-Government within the British Empire. I am not yet in despair; there are many deeds of selfishness which we must get redressed from Britain, there are many misgivings and misunderstandings which we must remove from ourselves.

    But on any occasion when we find ourselves under entire despair, friends, let us remember always that our Dharma forbids us any act of violence to person or property. We may follow the path of “soul force” or “Satyagrah” and undertake voluntary sufferings on ourselves rather than make others suffer by our passion and anger. To me the maxim of Zoraster is very clear, “Let sovereign know that God gives sufferance to human power only for the greater care for human freedom; the power that seeks to destroy shall be destroyed itself”. History is not without proofs of these teachings. Let us pray the day may never come for our British Empire but Heaven helps those who help themselves.

     

    Rowlatt’s Bills, and the Delhi Tragedy

    Friends, I do not wish to speak much on this extremely painful subject. We have heard and read much about these measures, specially during the first twenty days of the month of March and those who have gone through the proceedings of the last Session of the Imperial Council carefully, must remember the extreme pain and agony through which they must have passed day after day, when reading how our leaders- one and all- loyally, with unfailing energy, struggled upto the last minutes with their arguments, logic rhetoric, persuastion, entreaties, and warnings, but all these have been in vain.

    The European members of the Council, and thank God only the Europeans, were not impressed at all. The Bills were passed by the entire block of officials and European majority. The wishes, the feelings and the demands of our extremely united Nation and a Country were ignored.

    Let us still hope that the Secretary of State will yet recommend His Majesty, the King Emperor, not to give his assent to these bills which have created such keen feelings in India. But friends, even if this last hope of ours is shattered. I would urge you to remain perfectly balanced, clam, and with full trust in Providence. Friends, do try to understand the real spirit of Mahatma Ghandhi’s Satyagrah movement. Soul-force can only succeed when not a tinge of anger and hatred is within us, and when we have entire faith in our Atomic Power. We would be weakening the great spiritual movement of Satyagrah, if we cannot follow the teachings of Mahatma Gandhi. Follow them if you can, and be true to a letter, otherwise friends, I urge you do not-do not join the Satyagrah. To weaken “Atma” is fatal to our cause, I urge you for the sake of India, for the sake of Mahatma Gandhi, and for the sake of Satyagrah, to understand that this movement is entirely spiritual and not in the least political.

    The Delhi tragedy has grieved us immensely. Precious lives have been lost through unwisdom and injustice; no better proof can be had how India is suppressed by irresponsible servants of the government and how dangerous it is to give power to officials who have no sympathy, and who forget themselves in intoxication of power. But I feel, these lives have not been lost in vain. Time will prove it. I would urge that our people should erect in Delhi a monument in holy memory of those who lost their lives in the tragedy. It will enable us to keep our memory green and to keep our eyes ever on our goal.

     

    The Year 1919 – Our hopes & our Anxieties

    The year 1919 promises to be a momentous one for our empire in many ways. The entire world in this first year of the peace is naturally busy with problem of “settling down” and in this process of “settling down” it must pass through highest hopes and deepest anxieties.

    So far as India is concerned my foremost anxiety is about the question of the “CALIPHATE”. India contains a large number of the followers of Prophet Muhammad and any disturbance of Muhammadan feelings must affect the whole of India. I know how strongly the current of feeling is running in India about the question of the “CALLIPHATE” and my greatest anxiety for 1919 for India is on this matter. Let us earnestly hope that justice, wisdom and statesmanship will prevail with those who are deciding the fate of the religious centres of Islam. It cannot be denied that the Muhammadans of India have loyally given their services to their British King against the Sultan of Turkey, as a Ruler, but certainly not as their Caliph; they keep their religious allegiance with the Sultan of Turkey as their Caliph and their determination to acknowledge him as Caliph must not be and cannot be interfered with.

    The conciliatory attitude which the Government of India have recently shown in this matter has made the position somewhat easy for the present and I would request our Anglo Indian Journals to refrain from remarks which may bring about a crisis. When even men like H. H. The Aga Khan and Syed Amir Ali have expressed their views on the matter with such firmness, it should not be difficult for our English friends to imagine the gravity of the situation.

    The replies of British Ministers, the Viceroy and the Governor that the Muhammadan case will be properly represented at the Peace Conference and that the subject would be left to the Muhammadans to decide have brought some relief and let us hope that Great Britain will insist upon this claim of our Muhammadan Brethren being accepted.

    The second great anxiety is in connection with the Indian Reform Bill. The general feelings is that now the war is over, India cannot get anything substantial and not much will come out of the King’s announcement of the 20thAugust 1918; people have lost faith to such an extent that they feel that the terms of the announcement will be twisted and turned by British statesmen and officials to fit in with their proposals. Several measures adopted by the Viceroy and Provincial Heads since the Armistice, several acts of officials in higher services against Indians, and the rapid disappearance of that milder and kinder attitude which was shown by Englishmen towards the Indians during the War adds to the doubts of the Indian that no substantial Reform will be granted to India.

    The relations between the two races are getting so strained that friendship between and European and an Indian is becoming impossible. I view this stage with great

    regret and anxiety.

    India has been a nation hungry for its food, for its education and for its political freedom, and the longer it takes to satisfy them the stronger their demands will become and feelings are bound to run higher. The patience of the Nation is getting exhausted and the anxiety of those who yet hope to see the matters set straight by peaceful methods is becoming deeper. The officials are greatly mistaken if they judge India by the circle of title-hunters, flatterers and eaves-dropping reporters by whom they are surrounded. The public know these persons in their true colours and the more such persons are honoured or found in the company of officials, the Government houses and Collectors’ bungalows, the more awkward becomes the position of Government. These sycophants and tale bearers do more harm to British Rule than to Indians against whom the minds of the officials are being constantly poisoned. What is to be extremely deprecated is that the gulf between the officials and the public is getting wider, and on that account the relations between the two races the Indians and the Europeans are getting so strained that as I said above day by day even personal friendship between an Indian and an European is becoming impossible. Instead of the struggle between bureaucracy and the people’s rights the opposition has become as it were between the Indians and the Europeans. Rude treatment of several Civil & Military European officers and subordinates towards the Indians, frequent advertisements of various Government Depts. such as Post, Telegraphs, Railways, etc. and the Port Trust advertising for posts to be filled up and mentioning clearly that only Europeans were required, injustice to Indians to get their rightful claim of promotion and position and passing them over to give room to the European Sub-ordinates over them, add much to resentment of the Indians. And the constant question one asks is “How long shall our Country suffer this?” One such question in an Indian heart means added feelings against those responsible and I ask my English Friends how long this will last? Can a nation allow it? Or will nature allow it?

    And to thoughtful Indians all these cause grave anxiety; that India is losing faith in Britain is apparent and this is highly undesirable. Sometimes I do feel that, unwisdom guides the fate of on rulers. I urge and appeal therefore, to all Englishmen if my humble voice from this far away corner of India can reach them, to release the gravity of the situation. The only remedy is to grant immediately a substantial measure of reforms as demanded and make out a proper scheme even by stages to convince the people of India that the full share of responsible Government will be reached by certain specified stages and within a definite period, so that the people of the country in co-operation with the Government may in right earnest begin to work for the development and growth of the country accordingly.

    It appears that under the Montague-Chelmsford Scheme of Reforms, a private book of instructions is to be given to the Governors, as to how the men of the I. C. S. and other services are to be protected against the orders issued by the responsible ministers of the province if they be Indians. Far better would it be if in that book of instructions the Governors be asked to instruct men of the I. O. S. and of other services and other Englishmen in the country to treat Indian people with sympathy courtesy and the respect, which is due to one man from another and to see that this is done. Continued efforts should be made to bring the officials and the public closer. Sympathy is the only way. India is the easiest country to rule. Its people are simple and devoted. In order to realise this you have only to see how a good and sympathetic official or his wife is being practically worshipped in India. People of India are grateful if only sympathy is shown towards them.

    And my third great anxiety is for ourselves. Firstly I do feel sometimes our lack in sense of proportion in blaming officials for acts and imputing motives which are either greatly exaggerated or do not exist; I also view with alarm our growing bitterness towards Europeans generally, so much that our present tendency is to regard every European, official or non-official wherever we have occasion to deal with him as inspired by deliberate hostility towards us. My friends, this is not right on our part and cannot be justified. Many a time we do not even wait to see how a Governor or a new official would treat the Indians or how he would administrator the duties of his office. We are apt to class them all as one; this attitude does a great harm to our cause and must be checked for the sake of fairness and the desirability of preserving good will between the two great races of the Empire and on higher grounds of love and sympathy for all children of God. Sympathy and love cannot last long unless they are mutual. I am very fond of saying and I repeat “Let us help and co-operate wherever help and co-operation is needed; oppose where opposition is necessary and right”.

    Secondly, we must correct our attitude towards our own leaders, who have practically dedicated their whole lives to the service of our cause. Leaders of all parties, whether of the right, the central or the left party must receive our respectful regard justified by their character, sincerity, patriotism and services to our country whatever be their opinions. Even as regards difference of policy and opinion every view honestly held deserves our consideration and tolerance. We must remember the words of a great Sage that ungratefulness is the greatest vice; and if we fall under the temptation of this vice of ungratefulness either towards our leaders or towards our rulers to whom we are extremely grateful for such services as they have rendered to the country, a reaction and arrest in our development must come. Our doubts then become the seeds of our own internal dissensions among us. Enmity within our own household is highly dangerous for our cause even more detrimental than any form of autocracy or bureaucracy of outsiders; we must drive out intolerance and intellectual tyranny from ourselves.

    Thirdly what makes me anxious for ourselves is our want of deep study in matters political. We are growing highly sentimental and emotional and less inclined to appeals to reason. It is observed at most of our meetings. Appeals to sentiment, denunciation of Government or officials or putting forward of big demands elicit the largest response. Our devotion to leaders is measured by volume of cheering and the popularity of a speakers seems to depend on the use of strong language making of extreme demands. The stronger the language, the extremer the demands, the greater the applause. This attitude of our cannot help us in our progress nor can it convince our opponents of our capacities. I urge therefore strongly for close and devoted study of political problems, facts, figures and statistics. A fairly large bulk of excellent literature on Indian political problems has already been published and we must develop a love for study. We must encourage regular study groups in our associations and make efforts to educate our masses in as much details as possible so that they may have intelligent and real grasp of the various problems. We must see that our political literature is translated in all the vernaculars. Biographies and speeches of our leaders should be made available in all public libraries and all possible means should be adopted to awaken Indian masses to a realization of the value of the study of the problems.

    Friends, I would not wish you to labour under a misapprehension that I am pessimistic of India’s growth; side by side with my anxieties for every problem, there are many gleams of hope; I am optimistic and look forward to a bright future for India. In the past, every nation and country has passed through the severe crisis of “Political hunger and demand for rights”. Even at the present time we see what is passing in some countries e.g. Russia and Germany. I am however hopeful that India’s struggle for freedom will not be with any evil or wrong doing. Though our land and ourselves will have to pass through strict ordeals and sufferings to reach the goal, I feel that the ideals of our past civilization and our Dharma are too deep-rooted in every Indian Child and will save us from recourse to wrong methods for political freedom.

    For the year 1919, I hope to see unprecedented progress in our capacity to sacrifice and suffer, in our industrial development in our social life and in matters political and educational. The anxieties which I have dealt with for problems of Caliphate, Reform Scheme and ourselves are not without hopes of satisfactory arrangement and solutions. In the end I would urge, my friends, along with strong will and determination, a balanced mind and patient judgment.

     

    The I. C. S

    In our present political activities a great deal is said about the I. C. S., and how to deal with this body is a matter sufficiently important for our future to deserve our keen consideration. Their joint and open opposition against Indian Reforms in certain provinces and the Viceroy’s opening speech at the last Imperial Council Meeting must lead us to reflect very seriously on the subject. There is no doubt that the I. C. S. has grown to be very unpopular in this country. This body of public servants has been running so long in a particular groove of the system of autocracy, that it is very difficult to move it out from this position. In fact the bureaucratic frame of mind has become, as it were, a second nature with almost all members of this service and its Indian members are not exceptions to this.

    But it is plain and clear that neither the I.C.S. nor any other service can remain as our rulers or masters any longer. The I.C.S. and other public services are the servants of the public as the very words imply and they must not arrogate to themselves the functions of Government which properly belong to the people and which they alone must exercise through their duly appointed representatives. The people of India have realized this and they are determined to acquire these rights.

    We have been observing that for the defence of this body, the European Association, The European Chambers of Commerce and a large and influential group of Englishmen most of whom are interested in India simply on account of trade connections or investment of capital have been working actively during recent times. The Sydenham Clique is provided with large funds by these individuals and associations. The result of my observation and study of this matter is a conclusion arrived at sometime ago which I am getting more and more confirmed that the I.C.S. is a useful tool in the hands of a body of Commercial men and financiers in England and India who are working for their own selfish advantages and oppose strongly the Indian aspirations and progress; because let us clearly understand that our impoverishment and sufferings are due not so much to the system of revenue administration as to problems relating to tariff, exchange, finance, banking, currency, railway and shipping. All these are controlled by these Commercial men and financiers, who actually form a very influential Government party in England and the I.C.S seem to be under their influence and guidance owing to the power they wield on party politics in England. This also explains why the Government of England, the Secretary of State and even the Government of India so often show great anxiety to protect and defend the I.C.S to such an extent as to make one feel that the Government is afraid of them.

    This commercial party holds the real key to the position of affairs in India; they know what an asset India is to England, and they know also how to keep India under their thumb. These men in the intoxication of power have become unconscious not only of right and wrong as far as the Indian Nation is concerned but they have also become blind to the dangers of alienating the sympathy and love of a nation and a country which has brought them great prosperity, which has been heart and soul with their country and people all throughout the Great War and which gave them such indispensable help at the time of their extreme difficulty and peril. I urge therefore my countrymen that we should go to the root cause of our sufferings; let us raise our eyes to the vital problems wherein lie the real mischief. We have steadily given away ourselves by our ignorance. We must thoroughly educate ourselves in these problems of tariff, exchange, currency and finance. Some of us must make regular study of these subjects. Let us strive for that important reform, that of fiscal autonomy which vitally affects the economic future of the country. We must produce students, thinkers and workers for handling and tackling such vital problems, the root cause of our sufferings, the drain from our country and the poverty and ignorance of our masses. We must find out and train men and women who would devote their entire time thus to our country’s cause, and we must be ready to provide maintenance for them and their families if need be.

    I think we must also make a serious effort to impress upon this body of I. C. S. what is right and advantageous for all concerned. We must admit that, this body as a whole has been found able and hard working and possessing several good traits of character. It includes among its members several who according to their own light honestly wish to work for the good of India and some even if few have gone out of the way to labour for India’s good at great sacrifice and cost to themselves and have proved beyond doubt that they are true and good friends of India. For many improvements and developments in our country, we have to be grateful to them; in several respects their services have been valuable; hence I have often felt that attacks from our side on this body of public servants have been severer than can be justified; In fact I see a tendency amongst us to throw the responsibility for every possible grievance or deficiency on them; this we should avoid. They are highly educated and men of reason and I think we ought to impress upon them that their attitude does no good to Indians or Englishmen and in the .long run must do positive harm to their own country. Why should they oppose to the union of Hindus and Muhammadan in India? Will they or can they ever succeed? Have they not got enough proofs that where the question of political freedom will come the Hindus and the Muhammadan can and will unite as one nation. All what we wish is that the I. C. S. or any other service in India shall be Indianized and that they shall not remain in India, feeling or acting as foreigners. Sympathy and goodwill do not cost anything. These are sure to bring happiness to them and all Indians. On our part also we must then feel that we have no desire to rule over Englishmen in India just as we have no desire to be ruled by them; when India enjoys responsible Government their position of equality with Indian will be amply secured and that under the new changes, no Englishman serving whether in the I. C. S. or any other service will have reason to be dissatisfied; they should be assured of same respect and treatment which any son of the Soil would receive at our hands the same respect and treatment which the officials receive in England itself under responsible Government.

    I feel similarly that there is no reason for the British Capitalists to be apprehensive of their future in India.

    It would be India’s duty and pleasure to see that commercial relations between England and India are strengthened for their mutual benefit. All that we shall see is that India’s industries shall not be crushed and India’s trade shall not be wiped out for the sake of England’s Industries and English trade; but at the same time we shal1 see as citizens of the British Empire that we do not for our advantage attempt to harm the industries and commerce of England. The fears entertained by British officials and British Commercialists will turn out to be simply idle fears, for when the full measure of reform is granted to India, the ties between the two races will be found to be growing stronger and the volume of trade between the two countries will be found to be double or triple or even more than what it is now. The result is bound to be such for it can be proved from history. But all these can happen only if India’s rights of self-government are accepted and if India is to be treated with justice, equality and freedom. If we can only understand and make our I. C. S. friends also understand what a glorious future awaits the Empire by adopting a policy of mutual goodwill by the substitute of Responsible Government for autocracy in India and by accepting India as on equal partner in the Empire, the world for both England and India would be very much more different, from what it is now and much more happy than it is today. Some patriots dream of the days when India will be administered not by these hired services but by honorary managers in place of the I. C. S. and other Public servants. Who would not long for that day! That day shall be “The Day” for India! When that day comes, India will reach the summit of its glory; when India is able to produce such able sons and daughters as can administer the country as honorary managers, there can be no cause of anxiety for those in public services, because I am sure during such days of glory, India’s Industry, Art, Science and Agriculture will have so far developed as to easily employ and take up all highly educated men and women and possibly they would be far more happy in other departments of life than in public services. May that day come soon.

     

    Our Work in England

    Ever since the Delhi Congress our minds have been greatly exercised over the question pf our work in England and the immediate dispatch of deputations from various bodies. The Congress resolved to send a deputation but the wording of the resolution regarding the deputation has created doubts whether or not the deputation had the power of negotiation. Some leaders are of opinion that the Congress has given a mandate to the Deputation not to negotiate for anything less than what is contained in the resolution passed at Delhi; other leaders including our Pandit Madan Mohan Malaviya, the revered President of the Delhi Congress are of opinion that the resolution as worded does not take away the power of negotiation. This may be if we construe the wordings of the resolution literally. But friends, the discussion on the resolution in the subjects committee as well as in the open Congress left no doubt in my mind that the deputation had a clear mandate and no power of negotiation. I hold therefore that we have no option but to choose the lesser of the two evils viz the mandate or negotiation with the risk of possible censure from the next Congress, I myself feel that our deputation must have our full confidence and possess power to negotiate even if there is a risk of a censure from the next Congress, though I hope our people will realise by the time the wisdom of granting the power of negotiation. Let us choose the leaders in whom we have trust, but having chosen, give them the liberty to negotiate. Our respected leaders whom we elect to go to England in a Deputation should have our fullest confidence and we must request them to do their best on our behalf, with their discretion, judgment and wisdom. I cannot imagine anyone of them, possibly doing anything to harm our interests and I on my part would give the authority to negotiate Carte-blanche.

    We should also request our leaders forming the deputation to agitate strongly and work for the removal of the hardships under which our brethren labour in South and East Africa. We must impress upon Englishmen that the shameful and unhuman treatment given to the Indians in these colonies must add greatly to our feelings of resentment and we in India can no longer tolerate to see the sufferings of our brethren elsewhere.

    But apart from the question of deputation for the reform scheme we have to continue our efforts to press hard in England our claims for our country. We have to educate the English people about India. Even most of the educated persons in England have no real idea of what India is; some think it is full of jungles and forests and uneducated masses of an aboriginal type. Some think India is full of seditionists and anarchists and feel that Englishmen in India are bearing great risks of life and property. I make it a point to ask every Englishman whom I meet as to what his views were about India before he had actually visited it and almost always everyone admitted his gross ignorance of the country at that time. Several statements about India made in well known English Dailies and Magazines and in some books on India written by English men, show how shockingly ignorant the writers are about our country. Questions asked in Parliament prove how little the members of the Parliament know and yet they profess to rule India wisely and well and consider our country as it great trust put in their hands by Providence to manage.

    Several Englishmen are fond of judging India by its apparent prosperity, from the increasing numbers of large buildings, by its largely increased imports and exports and such other “side shows” as I call them and they look with pride on “what Britons have made of India” and nothing but the continued propaganda in England would make them to see or discover the reality that the apparent prosperity of India is a great dilusion. It is only the prosperity of a few rich men, the masses say 95 percent are poor, very poor, burdened with the high cost of living, miserable with low income and wages, starving with insufficient food and clothing, sick with plague, cholera and other epidemics. No better proof is required to substantiate the fact of extreme poverty of India than Sir James Meston, the finance minister’s own statement at the last session of the Imperial Council Meeting that the total number of persons in India assessed to income tax is only 381,000 and by raising the taxable minimum of income from Rs. 1000 to Rs. 2000 per year, he will be relieving no fewer than 237,000 assesses. A writer in the “Servants of India” truly states that “if there is much diffused prosperity in the country, signs of it ought to be visible in the daily life of the people. The plague, cholera and influenza epidemics do not show that the resisting capacity of the masses is greater than before.”

    All these show how important is the need for us to educate England about India. I have not lost hopes in England.

    Mr. A. G. Redmond Howard (one of the strugglers agitating for Home Rule for Ireland) has written somewhere truly, “Bureaucracy is foreign to the most elemental instinct of Englishmen, and if one may use a paradox” a very little historical investigation will show that Home Rule means nothing else but British Rule, in so far at least as that latter term is used in any democratic sense.” And what does India want? We also want the British Rule in that democratic sense; we are and promise to remain “loyal to the King” but refuse to be “the slaves of every passing clique” of selfish anti-Indian Englishmen. We would be faithful subjects of the King Emperor ruling over British Empire with all the strength of our love but not slaves of a bureaucratic body. We must therefore have a permanent army of workers in England but we cannot send such workers unless we are prepared to maintain them and also provide for their families; of what avail are the big words, demands and cries from the platforms, unless we are ready to make a sacrifice. Home Rule can never come without sacrifices. Sacrifices such as create sufferings for opponents is against the Divine Path, against our Dharma; for us there is one path, the path of self sacrifice. Let us give for it what is deal unto us-our workers, our able sons and daughters, our wealth, our brains our energy and time and then shall come the day of our glory. That day shall not only be glorious to us but for the whole of the British Empire, if Britain only so wills it.

     

    Our Women

    It is a happy sign of the times to see the awakening in our women also; it is gratifying to see them taking lively interest in matters of civic and national affairs. Some of them are agitating strenuously for equality of rights and this movement of women’s rights must be fully encouraged in every part of India. Friends, we must be prepared fully for this change. We must give up ourpresent ideas of women that they are only meant for house and kitchen work, for nursing children and social comfort. I say “present” because such ideas about women never existed in the past, at least not in India. Our scriptures, our histories, our traditions, our stories and pictures prove beyond doubt that women in ancient India were quite competent and did take part in all the departments of life, even in battlefields and bore the fullest share of responsibility with men. The picture of the Deity as Ardha-nalishwara is a striking symbol of this great fact. I can write pages to quote chapters and words. To refuse women their rights and their proper position in life is to show one’s ignorance and non realization of the noble contribution to life which a woman is meant for; above all this refusal is harmful to ourselves, to our cause and to our country. They can be our ideal helpmates in our struggles for self Government and self determination and their infinite capacity of self sacrifice will be an invaluable asset to the country. It is only a matter of giving them opportunity and we will soon see them on the right level. I am not looking at this problem from a sentimental point of view. I feel no department of life can be complete without women by the side of men and the same rule must apply to our present struggle for freedom and liberty. We must have women as our co-partners with us in our struggle; then alone can the struggle be won. We must have them along with us to drink the nector-the amrit of liberty after the struggle; then alone can true freedom be enjoyed. Without them our struggles shall be lifeless, our peace joyless. No nation, no country, no community can long bear the burden of unequal treatment of position to the two sexes; it is a question of time; what men would not do willingly, nature must force them to do; why not then take a shorter path? let us acknowledge and accept women’s birth right, let them be by our side in bearing the burden of national struggles, for, they will add to our strength; their education will be more rapid, their children after such struggles and education, will be hardier and better trained and the next generation shall be far more highly advanced in body, mind and spirit than the present one. I urge the acknowledgement of women’s rights, because I feel, we shall be doing them justice after the great injustice that we have done them these many long years. We will be doing what is right for them and with their cooperation our day of political victory shall be brought nearer.

     

    Some other demands

    Friends, our important and urgent demands are so numerous that I cannot go into details unless I am prepared to speak for days and days together and you prepared to listen to dry facts and figures with patience; But I feel I can not omit a reference to at least some of them, be it even briefly.

    The most urgent problem we Indians must look to is that of our Military expenditure; the staggering figures provided for in the last budget must open our eyes and we must insist that a portion and a large portion of it must be borne by the British Treasury. A large majority of troops in India is kept up for the protection of British interests as a whole and not for India and to tax India’s purse for this is highly unjust. The Indian troops and British troops are kept in India on such unequal terms and meted out such unequal treatment that I consider it outrageous that India should be asked to bear such as heavy burden.

    The question of the position of our Indian Brethren in South and East Africa must be taken up by us earnestly. The disgraceful treatment accorded to them by handful of white men in the British Colonies must cause for all of us a revolt of feelings in our minds. If I describe the treatment which our Indian brethren receive there, the term “cruel” would fall far short in describing. We must strongly impress upon the Indian Government to take this matter up seriously and we must not rest until we see that the affairs of our brethren in other colonies are settled to satisfaction.

    The Press Act is still operated without the least regard for justice, truth or fairness. The Indian press is gagged for trifling causes, whilst Anglo Indian Journals are allowed to abuse the Indians without the slightest restraint and are free to wound Indian feelings to their hearts’ contents. How long can this last?

    Our education is another item of importance. We are not given the right type of education nor are given sufficient education. All civilized Nations have made greater progress in education and in this regard India stands last amidst civilized nations of the world. The type of education which leads to the prosperity of the country, which builds up mind and body, finds no place in our educational system and some people ask if this is being purposely done to keep Indians always a suppressed nation. The whole system has become so wooden, so mechanical in this department that it requires a radical change.

    The last question but in no sense the least important is the question of the release of Messrs Mohamedali and Showktali. I do not wish to enter into the history of that case but it is now no longer a secret that the Government had and has absolutely no justification for their internments. It is more or less now a question of prestige bat what is past cannot be undone. It will be truly British to let them have their freedom and we on our part shall be glad to drop the curtain on the subject. The freedom of other innocent internees must also be demanded.

    But I must stop here to turn to questions of our own Province.

     

    Position of Sind in The Coming Reforms

    As far as our little province is concerned this question should engage our uppermost attention, especially as the Scheme of Indian Reforms is soon to be out. We Sindhis must now clearly and definitely form our opinion and attitude as to what position we wish to hold in future. For some years past, we have come to two main conclusions; one is that the special powers delegated to the Commissioner in Sind must be withdrawn. We Sindhis consider it highly inadvisable to leave such powers in the hands of one person from whose personal whims, the men of the province may have constantly to suffer.

    The second conclusion of ours is that the Government of Bombay has been too busy and too distant to give sufficient attention and justice to the growth of Sindh; it is even asserted that because of Bombay, Sindh has been done absolute injustice, in several instances. In recent years during the Governorship of Lord Willingdon we have forced the Bombay Government to pay some attention; our new Governor Sir George Lloyd promises to be more attentive; but where a fate of a province is concerned, one cannot depend upon such an uncertain factor as the personality of a Governor.

    From time to time, several alternative schemes have been presented to us as to the future of Sind-

    1. To leave our province as it is, attached to the Bombay Presidency.

    2. To constitute Sindh as one of the separate provinces of India.

    3. To attach Sindh to the Province of Punjab.

    4. To join Baluchistan to Sindh and make Sind and Baluchistan a joint province.

    5. To join to Sindh a portion of Punjab upto Mooltan and make that joint area a separate province.

    Various arguments and opinions have been brought forward in favour of and against each of these alternatives and I propose to discuss each one of them. The proposal

    marked 4 in my list viz to join Sind and Baluchistan in one Province seems to me impracticable and not at all advantageous. Baluchistan, as it stands, is held for military purposes and it is but fair that this portion be entirely managed by the military department of the Government. Though I do not see at all why a separate measure of popular Government cannot be introduced in other departments, expecting the military department in such places as Quetta, Peshawar and frontier stations which are entirely managed by the Military authorities, I hold that to attach Baluchistan to Sindh which is purely managed by civil authorities would be very disadvantageous. There would be a constant clash between the two authorities Civil and Military; also the Government will not introduce such a large measures of reform in Baluchistan as it might be prepared to introduce in Sindh. The revenue paying capacity of Baluchistan being very small will have to bear a share of Civil expenditure on Baluchistan and for all these reasons the proposal must be rejected in the interest of Sindh.

    Now let us consider whether it will be better for us to be attached to Bombay or to the Punjab. Our connection with the Bombay Presidency of over half a century standing makes some of us unwilling on merely sentimental grounds to separate from Bombay and to be attached to a new province; but sentiments have no place in matter like this and we must discuss the subject on purely practical grounds. A look at the map will show us immediately that naturally we are joined to the Punjab. Our land, railways, rivers and canals are all interwoven in one whole with those of the Punjab.

    Looking at it from the point of view of commerce and trade interest our entire dependence is on the Punjab. The Chief department of business, the Railway management, is centered in the Punjab. The chief exports of Sind, wheat, hides cotton etc. are from the Punjab. A very great bulk of our export is into the Punjab; our local wholesale trade of Sind exists because of the Punjab. I do not see any independent factor between Sindh and Bombay. The interests of Sindh and those of Bombay are separated and distinct and it is therefore natural that the Bombay Government and the people of Bombay have not been able to appreciate the importance of Sindh at its proper value and have not felt that responsibility for Sind, which they would have, if the commercial and other interests of Bombay had been inter-allied, .interwoven or inter-independent on those of Sind as in the case of the Punjab.

    Considering therefore these important aspects of the question, I feel that Sind must be detached from Bombay and joined to the Punjab. The Sind-Punjab Government will feel a greater responsibility towards the development of Sind, as it will be advantageous to both Sind and Punjab and hence the interests of Sind will be more protected. The one and only one difficulty which necessitates further consideration is our political freedom; some of our friends feel that remaining attached to Bombay will mean more liberal and advanced political reforms for Sind than what we would get if attached to the Punjab, because it is said that Punjab is politically not so advanced as Bombay. We are also told that the Punjab is a less educated province in comparison to Bombay and autocracy is more prominent in Punjab and we would therefore have much smaller measure of political reforms. Our activities also, we are told, will be a great deal cramped by the repressive policy of a less liberal government like the Punjab. Friends, I feel that the Punjab Government will in due course become more liberal, but if it were even not so, is it not right and proper that we of Sind should join the Punjab and help it. I would certainly like the people of Sind to make of Sind-Punjab connection as fine a job as is possible by making continued efforts more for liberalization of the provincial Government. It may mean a drawback temporarily, but I am sure, very soon we will be able to convince the joint provincial government that our province shall not have to wait very much longer for as large a measure of reforms as any other province may get.

    Now let us discuss some merits of an autonomous Sind or of Sind with a small portion of Punjab say upto Multan attached to it.

    I would insist on autonomous Sind (with portion upto Multan) in preference to any alternative. From the ancient history of Sind it already appears that district upto Multan was attached with Sind. The customs, manners and the language of Multan is more akin to the, present in Sindh than to Punjab and administrative advantages for a province of Sind including area upto Multan, taking in all that portion of Bhawalpur state, will be far greater than if Sind alone constituted an independent province.

    Sind is a fairly large province with an individuality and capacity and resource of its own. It can hold its own and stand on its own legs without being attached to any other province. From ancient times from B.C. 3600 upto the year 1842 Sind was always a province by itself except for a few years when it was annexed to Delhi. It appears that the province of Sind was considered as a prize by various nations who invaded it from time to time. Baluchistan, Afghanistan and Persia invaded it. Arabs, Moghuls, Rajputs at different times owned it. Its trade, its art, its industry were well known in the whole of the Eastern world, and merchants came from distant lands to trade with this province. It was one of the richest provinces of India. The History of Sind records many a heroic deed of its Rulers, its warriors and its Amirs. Sind was even then directed by the Government of Delhi through the agency of Governors.

    I have stated above that the progress of Sind has been a great deal checked by its being attached to Bombay. Our education and our industrial development have been neglected to the cost of our moral and mental progress. The sanitation in the villages of Sind is disgraceful. Mortality is extraordinarily high. There are very few hospitals and dispensaries. The number of roads in the moffusil and their condition are a very sad commentary on the present provincial administration; while in the case of the roads in the moffusil in the Presidency proper, the Government of Bombay have undertaken the upkeep of many of them from Provincial Revenue. In Sind this burden has been thrown entirely on the scanty finances of the local boards; the recent grant of Rupees Fifty thousand extracted from Provincial Government by the endeavours of some of our council members is grossly inadequate for the needs of the situation. For years we have been drawing the attention of the Governors of Bombay and the Viceroys to Bombay’s neglect of Sind but little has come out of it. Lord Willingdon promised and was able to show more sympathy but the distance between Bombay and Sind was great and the system was too rigid for him to be able to do his duty towards our province. The present Governor hopes to do his duty for Sind. To fight against the wooden machinery of Government he needs must be a very strong man; let us hope he will be; and even if he is, how long as I have stated before can we depend upon the uncertain factor of a governor’s personality.

    Our population is large enough. In the year, 1911 it was 3,513,435. I estimate it must be now over 4,500,000. I also estimate our provincial revenue is over 180 lacs per annum; and our province is certainly in a position to maintain full provincial administration with its councils and a high court.

    We will be able better to attend to agriculture, sanitation, education and industrial needs of our province. We would be able to interest all our people in the administrative problems of our province; we will have no more to depend upon 3 or 4 honourable members of our councils to travel a thousand miles to make a few speeches or to put a few interpellations in the council to ventilate the grievances of Sind.

    Sind will have its capital at Karachi with a very much more developed port and harbour. The present clash of commercial interests between Bombay and Sind will not affect the progress of Karachi, in so far as we shall no longer be under the control of rival commercial interests. I dream of an autonomous Sind far ahead of all provinces. I decline to believe as is so often stated that ours is a backward province. Neglected as we have been we are today more awake and more conscious of our needs than any other province of India. Politically Sind is an advanced province; in religion the most broadminded and free from orthodox fanaticism, socially much less bound by creeds and undesirable customs and intelligence our people are in no way inferior to those of any advanced province. And I dream of Sind taking its place in the first rank of advanced provinces, and before long lead them all. Some of our friends believe that if Sind is constituted a separate province with its legislative and executive councils the councils will be dominated by those who will be acting merely supporters of the bureaucracy for some time to come. I do not share this view but even if it be so, we should be prepared to go through that intervening period and struggle throughout for an early termination of that condition of things; and if we have faith in us, I have no doubt that we shall be able to bring round the supporters of official policy to a true appreciation of the public point of view in all matters.

    And hence in the coming reforms we must demand nothing less than the reconstitution of Sind as a separate province, under a scheme of responsible Government with as many subjects transferred to popular control and as large franchise as may be conceded to Bombay. Friends, let there be no misunderstanding. I do not suggest that I favour the idea of the separation of Sind from Bombay and to grant to it any kind of Government. My support to the proposal of the reconstitution of Sind into a separate province is conditional on it being granted a measure of Responsible Government equal to that given to any other advanced province.

    And yet friends, there is a possibility of this demand of ours not being granted to us. I would be immensely sorry if it is not, but as practical politicians, we must consider what should be done in case Sind is not separated from Bombay. In that case I make the following suggestions that:-

    1. The special powers exercised by the Commissioner in Sind be repealed and either this post of Commissioner in Sind be abolished or his powers be kept down to the level of other commissioners. There is absolutely no need of such powers to be delegated to the head of the province; such powers do more harm than good and create a good deal of dissatisfaction.

    2. A High Court of Sind be established at Karachi.

    3. Care should be taken when framing the provincial budget for Bombay to allot for expenditure in Sind a fair-share of the provincial revenues; also the income and expenditure for Sind be shown separately in the budget.

    4. At least one meeting of the Bombay council should be held in Sind every year.

    5. The present practice of treating Sind as “Cindrella” of the province in educational sanitary and commercial matters and in the domain of the local self Government must come to an end.

     

    House tax in Sind

    Friends, let me express to you my conviction on this subject; though I Know a large majority of you will disagree with my views:

    During the last two years, Government’s efforts to impose House Tax in certain towns in Sind have been strongly opposed and protested against. I cannot understand how a municipality can be administered without such taxation. One of the main feature of a municipality relates to the sanitation of the town and sanitation is directly connected with houses; it is therefore in my opinion nothing but just, reasonable and right that houses be first taxed, It is argued that in Sind, the majority of house owners are very poor, they themselves residing in their small houses, and the house tax would hit them hard and alternative of octroi has been suggested. My belief is that octroi system unless it is restricted to articles consumed exclusively by the rich, hits the poorer more than house tax. Believe me that no trader pays octroi from his own pockets. He adds to his cost a fraction more but not less than what he pays as octroi. Octroi is mostly levied on such articles as are necessaries for poor persons and I am quite positive it adds more to their hardship than house tax. From the point of view of poorer classes we would be doing them a real service if we work for reduced octroi and if possible no octroi excepting articles consumed by the rich and agree in its place to an equitable form of house tax. We want our Municipalities to provide us with good roads, water, efficient sanitary arrangements and free education; some even demand model houses from the municipalities; demanding all these to say “no house tax” in not reasonable in my opinion. Once I read a argument against the proposed house tax in Sindh, that the municipality had a balance of Rs. 37, 000 and therefore there was no necessity of levying a house tax. If the municipality of a town of the size I have in view and had Rs. 37, 000 as its net balance, I do not think it should first wait to spend these away and then to levy a tax. After careful consideration, I have come to the conclusion that house tax is a preferable tax to any other tax. I would personally be very happy to know and find out sources of income for Municipalities, which may be levied more eqitably, so as to get the least out of the pockets of the poorer persons but still to secure adequate funds for the growing municipal needs; but I have yet failed to solve this question and I consider on the whole, the house tax as the lesser of the evils of taxation from the stand point of poor persons. In ancient time also each town and village panchayat had some form of taxation either per individual, family or house. Every small town or village according to our present needs requires some staff for administration, cleanliness and sanitation, a school and a dispensary and it is necessary to find out some means of income for the panchayat or the municipality; I do however admit that some reservation be made for taxing houses valued under a certain sum, or realising rent under a certain sum according to the status and resources of the town should be exempted from paying house tax; but those on whom a house tax can reasonably be levied should not be allowed to enjoy all privileges without giving something to the Municipality and I urge therefore your co-operation with Municipality authorities in this matter. On the other hand, I would urge the Government and Municipal authorities the extreme desirability of first inviting public co-operation as to the best and most equitable constructive proposals to increase the finances or municipalities, so as to prevent avoidable popular dissatisfaction; I consider it equally important that it should be the endeavour of the government and the Municipalities to see that the owner of the house called upon to pay such tax is in a position to pay it.

     

    Municipalities and Local Boards in Sind

    Under the new reform scheme, it is likely that the development of the local Self-Government Institution will be great and rapid. Hitherto in Sind, the progress of Municipalities has been very poor and very few towns have the privilege of Municipal administration; and where these Municipalities exist under the present District Municipal Act, limited powers are entrusted to members, the bulk of powers are retained in the hands of the officials; the system or Government nominations, the under influence of the authorities on nominated members and official interference are factors which are highly detrimental to Municipal administration.

    We must therefore demand the following reforms:

    1. Immediate changes in the District Municipal Act, giving more freedom of administration to municipalities.

    2. Entirely elected or almost entirely elected municipal boards.

    3. Powers to elect our own presidents and executive officers.

    4. Powers to remove our executive officers if found unsuitable.

    5. Creating widened franchise.

    6. Larger grants from Provincial and Imperial funds, especially in cases of small municipalities.

    7. Maintenance by Provincial Government of adequate expert staff for assisting municipalities in launching improvement schemes.

    It is a matter of serious consideration to find new sources of income for municipalities. Somehow or the people expect to pay as little as possible and in return get much. I have given elsewhere my views about house tax in Sind and I wish to add some more suggestions here, I feel that the municipalities can very justifically charge some what higher percentages of octroi on luxuries:- costly cloth, wines and spirits, cigarettes, motor cars, high class furniture and such articles can safely be classed for special octroi dues. A portion of income tax, say 20 percent, of the total collection should be allotted to Municipalities. I think this is an equitable demand on the part of the Municipalities.

    The growing demands of water supply, drainage, sanitation, dispensaries, hospitals, roads etc. must necessarily mean increased expenditure and it will be just if the municipalities are allowed a small portion say five percent of the profits earned on sales of lands and buildings. If a person buys a piece of land for Rupees ten thousand and sells for fifteen thousand, a sum of Rs. 250 would be a reasonable sum to pay to the municipality, because the profit earned is greatly due in majority of cases to the improvement and development of that quarter, effected by the Municipality.

    I also suggest that a local Self Government conference for Sind be held every year where the councilors of all municipalities, local boards, village panchayats and also the officers of these bodies may meet and discuss various problems, pertaining to health, sanitation, engineering, finance, water supply and such other subjects; it will have a great educative value and will be a source of mutual help to all.

    I would also urge and impress upon all of us that the right of electing members on the various boards is a sacred privilege, which must be exercised with the greater amount of care and consideration. Our votes must go to the right men, men of independence, energy, knowledge and integrity. Without such members, a good deal of time, energy and effort is wasted and it becomes hopeless to move on along progressive lines. The executive is generally fond of routine work and it requires study and patience to move them out of their routine to paths of progress and development. The future of Local Self Government depends largely upon ourselves; our firmness and determination to elect right men can certainly make municipal administration successful. Municipal work is highly interesting and fascinating; it ideals practically with the main problems of men’s happiness, viz: health, sanitation, children’s welfare, education, housing problems, etc. And I consider it is the duty of every man, more so a councilor to devote some time to faithful study of municipal problems. Some of us should be prepared to sacrifice our ambition of doing public work in other fields, for the work of devoting entire time to the Municipality. Sir Pherozeshaw Mehta was fervently devoted to Municipal work and he often said that some must be prepared even to give up the Imperial and Provincial Legislative councils and stick to municipal matters. Such high ideals of duty for our own city, town or village must be deeply cherished.

     

    The Press in Sind

    The method of the bureaucracy as far as the Press in Sind is concerned; have been very high handed and we people of Sind must raise our emphatic protest against such methods. During these years seven papers in Sind, weeklies and dailies, have one after another been called upon to pay securities, although I make bold to say that none of these papers preached anything which had the remotest connection to sedition. The Press Act and Defence of India Act were never meant for persecution for constitutional agitation. Both these acts have been greatly misused and Sind has not been free from such measure, Not only have some of them been called upon to pay security but the registered libraries have been prohibited from subscribing for them; no government and court advertisement and notices are allowed to be published in them; no printing work controlled by Government is given to them and general public is indirectly influenced not to support the papers and all this means extreme hardship particularly in case of moffusil papers which are being thus slained to death. The press owners and the editors who have thus suffered and sacrificed deserve all our sympathy and respect, not merely in words but in deeds also and I suggest that every big town must support its national organs whole heartedly. We must remember that the present awakening is mostly due to these presses and these national papers, and we must show our real gratitude. An influential committee has been formed to help our Sind National organs to keep them going and I do hope our Sind will not fall backward in helping this committee to do its work successfully. I also appeal to the Government to cancel its orders for security and to withdraw all other restrictions from the presses and thus remove a just cause for discontent. While on this subject, I cannot but express, my feelings at the way in which some of the Anglo Indian journals continue to write against Indians and Indian aspirations. The Government is ever ready to suppress a paper which points out its defects of administration and to class such writing as sedition; it is my firm belief that the insult and libelous terms daily hurled upon Indian leaders and the Indian masses, in several Anglo Indian journals go a long way in raising the anger and bitterness of Indian readers which sometimes lead to what is called sedition. I have known of several youngmen whose hearts have been burnt up with resentment and anger after reading certain Anglo Indian papers, whose profession has been the constant vilification of Indians. Freedom of the Press I believe in; liberty of opinions I am always advocating but every statement must be based on arguments and the writer ought to know its effect on the people. Do these journals understand that the Indians daily read these libels, do not take them as the opinions of certain individual editors but as the views of Englishmen generally and of the Government. That their writings instead of uniting tend towards alienation and that they actually thwart the purpose of several able Indian leaders and their followers who have entered the political arena simply to work hard to unite India and Britain and bring about a state of affairs under which Britons may not be classed as foreigners in India, either by themselves or by Indians but as true Indians working for good of India and the Empire. I urge such journals to change their attitude and policy towards Indians for the sake of the British Empire. I say that the existing policy of the Anglo Indian journals does no good to anybody; it does positive harm to the people of India and the Government and even to their own interests.

     

    Hindus & Moslems in Sind.

    Our province of Sind contains a large majority of Muhammadan population and the progress of our province must mainly depend upon unity and good will between the Muhammadans and the Hindus. Our province has been fortunate in so far as that relations between men of different faiths have been on the whole very friendly. No community in Sind is rigidly orthodox, owing in a measure, to existence of Sufistic influence and the relations between the communities are characterized by tolerance. And we must continue to strengthen the ties between these two communities more strongly than before. Government policy to give special for Muhammadan education must receive our cordial support from all. Large grant in-aid specially made to this community must not be looked upon any way as unfair to other communities. They need it more than others and the sooner the education spreads amongst our Muhammadan brethren, the better will it be for the whole province. We know what higher education among Muhammadan has done for other provinces. The Muhammadans are as emphatic in their demand for political freedom in those provinces as the Hindus and we should like to see the same spirit in Muhammadans of Sind also. Communal representation in Municipalities and Local Boards, if it satisfies the communities must be willingly allowed; as to public services we must realize that the Muhammadan as in a majority in this province and they must be given a greater share in the administration sooner or later; a few seats in our Municipal Boards or councils must not be looked upon by the Hindus with dissatisfaction. This will pay the province well within a short period.

    I personally feel that the present policy of officials towards Muhammadans in Sind, whatever is its inspiration, is really guided by the loving hand of Province. Sind has to be ready to take its place in the front rank in India and all this must be taken as preparation for that period of glory.

    On the other hand I must also urge my Muhammadan Brethren to act more united with other communities in matters pertaining to the progress of the Province; the adoption of a better attitude and the abandonment of “JO HUKUM” are essentially necessary in these days when the struggle to win self government for India is a settled programme of our work. Aloofness from such activities must in the long run act to their own disadvantage. Surely a few scholarships, posts of Mukhtiarkars, some Mullah schools, sweet words of officials, a few titles and honorary magistrateship can never be the goal of Muhammadans in Sindh. Many Muhammadans of the present generation, it is satisfactory to note, have realized the necessity of complete unity in all activities and I would urge them to devote some more time to educative work in the moffussil to awaken the mass and their fellow-brethren.

     

    Education in Sind

    In Sind, the state of our educational affairs is highly unsatisfactory. We have a very insufficient number of primary, middle or secondary schools. We have one solitary college but only for “Arts”; absolutely no means of acquiring sound technical, scientific, commercial, or agricultural education has been provided yet for Sindh. Our teachers are very poor paid. Even our coolies or sweepers are better paid; our text books are selected without much care or thought. Educationists in the real sense of the word hardly exist in Sind. The education department moves on in an automatic manner in same grooves as were cut thirty years ago, I do not see that the brains and the energy of educational officials in Sind are at all made use of. In a quiet corner of the cool city of Poona a Director of Public Instruction of Bombay Presidency is supposed to exist. In a quit little bunglow in civil lines at Karachi, a gentleman, styled the Educational Inspector is supposed to reside. I am doubtful if even this much is known about the Educational department to the public of Sind. The Educational Inspector is an unknown quantity; the deputies are merely known to teachers and some of the students as task masters; teachers in Sind are only known to students as some persons to keep them under control. Having some knowledge of education in ancient India and in western counties at present, I feel that the present system of education in Sind requires a great change. I believe much of time, energy and money is being wasted.

    As it is, the education department in Sind is almost a “Pardah Nashin”. No one knows any thing about it. Every child in Sind possibly knows the Collector, or the Commissioner, but no one knows the Educational Inspector. He hardly is counting in Sind. For matters educational we are either referred to the Commissioner who knows very little of education or the Director Public Instruction, who is hardly in touch with the Province, being a thousand miles away and can know very little about Sind.

    Friends, how long is this condition going to last? We must demand, I feel our own Director of Education in Sind who must be an eminent educationist and above all must know our people. He should be full of sympathy and should come in touch with every parent in Sind. He must be kept for years in Province, allowing him to rise according to his grade even if stationed in one post as the Director of Education in Sind. He must be directly responsible to the minister of education of the Presidency. Then alone, I feel our Sind will be able to get its full share of attention to improve this department both in matters of teaching and administration.

    We must insist on a detailed scheme of right education for our children, boys and girls. The education of our girls is shamefully neglected in our Province and we must strongly agitate for greater attention being paid. Sind has along been unjustly treated in allocating budget amount for our education in comparison to other parts of the Presidency and we must now demand not only just proportion in the future but also all our dues.

    I wish to speak a few words here with due respect to our Muhammadan Brethren in connection with their Mullah Schools. The present type of Mullah Schools does no good but does positive harm to development of Muhammadans in Sind. My Muhammadan friends, I urge you to open your eyes and be wide awake; speak out boldy that you do not want, you do not care for these old type of inefficient Mulla Schools; for religious education, insist on teaching religion to your children in regular schools or at home; this system of Mullah Schools will keep you ignorant and ever under bureaucracy because of want of sufficient secular education. You should demand that technical branches be attached to your schools; demand your teachers to be trained more rapidly, demand more pay for them, a better living wage for them and thus only will Sind rise up in full glory. I am glad to know that some of our Muhammadan leaders have realized this. I am told also that the educational department has already made useful suggestions to Government to take advantage of the present Mullah Schools and extend their scope by radical improvements. I do hope that Government will take immediate steps to improve the existing Mullah schools and put them on a more efficient basis. The want of an agricultural, a commercial and a technical College for Sind is urgent and great, and I hope, in the next budget it will be cheerfully sanctioned by the Government. I fell that if the Government and the educational department will openly take the public into confidence, with regards to education schemes now under consideration, rapid results can easily be achieved and hearty public responses relied upon. There is one important suggestion which I venture to make with a few to ensure a better understanding of our educational needs by the people of the province and that is that report of the Educational Inspector of Sind should be published for general information and not only a few strong extracts from it put in the Presidency report as is done at present. And then friends, along with the progress of education in all its branches we must begin to get ready for our own Sind University. The day for it, I assure you, is not distant and we must keep in mind that before long we shall see the stately domes of the Sind University rising against the sky, on the Clifton shore between Keamari and Clifton.

     

    National Education in Sind

    Friends, let us welcome warmly the establishment of National Educational Institutions in our Province. As you know a National University and a Society for the promotion of National Education, governed by well known men and ladies of India have been established since the last two years. It certainly does not aim to replace all the present educational institutions in India. For the present it aims at an experiment to arrive at a correct method as to the basis of education for Indians and to remove the defects in the present system, which has been productive of such great dissatisfaction and discontent. It aims to encourage the full and free growth of all the capacities of our boys and girls and thus to serve as a model for Government and other educational institutions. Owing to old established views on education that have taken their lodgement in the minds of people, and its complete severance from official control, the National education movement in India is bound to meet for some time with almost overwhelming difficulties and therefore is the greater reason why we Indians must help it, the more at the present stage. Let us remember that the first few years, all workers, helpers and students will be called upon to make sacrifice of money, energy and possibly career; the National Institutions will have to undergo the fire of criticisms and adverse reports, and therefore I urge all our Sindhi mothers, sisters, fathers and guardians to stand by them and help. At present there is a central Sind National College started on the bank of FuleliCanal in Hyderabad Sind, a school at Hyderabad, and a Pathshalla at Karachi. Various sacrificing professors and teachers are giving their energy. It can have no official help just yet. It cannot naturally reach an ideal stage soon but we must for India’s sake welcome those and consider our province fortunate in having the National Educational Institutions, much earlier than any several other provinces. National Educational Institutions are sure to be established all over Sind as soon as opportunity permits. Friends, I beg each of you therefore to help the movement and sacrifice daily even a pie, an anna or a rupee or more for this purpose. Begging from a Presidential Chair may be somewhat out of place, but I do it with full of consciousness, feeling as I do its urgent necessity for the development of the movement in Sind.

     

    Agriculture and Zamindari Problems in Sind

    Our province is mainly an agricultural province and more than two-thirds of its population lives by tilling the land. It behoves us therefore to attend to the various problems connected with agriculture and the life of the Zamindars in Sind.

    The relations between the agriculturist in Sind and the Government so far as revenue matters are concerned, are mostly governed by what are known as the Commissioner’s Special Circulars and our first complaint is about them. So far as I have inquired I find that these circulars have not been issued under any Act and thus lack legal authority. Their legality was even doubted by an experienced high official as can be seen from his evidence before the Decentralization Commission. But besides our objection as to their legality, the general complaint of our Zamindar is that in framing the circulars, the Zamindar’s point of view have not been and are not being taken into consideration, I consider it therefore an absolute necessity and nothing but fair that the Government should revise these circulars in consultation with educated and representative Zamindars. It is indeed to be regretted that at the last session of the Bombay Council, when Hon. Mr. Bhurgri suggested that the revision of the circulars be entrusted to a committee of officials and non-officials, the Government did not agree to the proposal but said that the Commissioner in Sind in revising the circulars will act in accordance with the usual practice and policy of Government and take into consideration the interest of the classes affected. The Government often complain of not receiving cooperation of the public and here we have a definite refusal by the Government itself of the offer of Zamindars to cooperate with officials in revising the Commissioner’s Circulars. I still hope our present Governor will see his way to accept the Zamindars’ offer as it will save a great deal of dissatisfaction.

     

     

    Text Box:  
Rasai
One of the sorest grievances of the Zamindars and the cultivators of Sindh, of very long standing is the demoralizing evil known as the Rasai system and the associated evils of Lapo and Cher. Complaints yet reach of the continuance of Rasai, Lapo and Cher; though it is satisfactory to note that some of the officials are strictly avoiding these and are endeavouring to repress them with a strong hand. Exactly an year ago a Committee was appointed to suggest measures for the suppression of these disgraceful practices. I would not now care much to speak about some very objectionable and unfair features of the proceedings of that Committee. But I do strongly protest at the inordinate delay made in publishing the report of the Committee. Although the evidence was finished in May last not even the printing of it was completed until the last month.

    The Committee has yet to prepare its report. The matter is of vital importance and I hope, the report will now be ready and published soon; and now that the gravity of the evils and their wide prevailance and its real causes have been established without the slightest doubt, by the overwhelming official and non-official evidence, Government will take immediate steps to suppress the evils, calling upon all the higher officials to make serious and persistent efforts in removing the evils.

     

    Text Box:  
Co-operative movement
The Cooperative movement was originally started in Sind more than 13 years ago, I learn by Mr. Wali Muhammad Hussonally,; but partly owing to peculiar conditions of Sind, it did not make great headway until quite recently. The appointment of a separate Assistant Registrar for Sind has brought about a striking change. The number of Cooperative Societies in Sind has increased literally by leaps and bounds, until today they are well over 120. The movement is one of immense potentialities and if properly developed it will have very great effect on the agricultural and industrial life of Sind. Its indirect moral and educative influence on the people is of no less importance. The indefatigable efforts of Mr. Azim Khan, the Assistant Registrar of the Cooperative credit Societies in Sind have resulted in the starting of the Sind Cenrtal Cooperative Bank at Karachi, which will finance the various Cooperative Credit Societies in Sind, and I feel very hopeful that with the assistance and cooperation of the educated and mercantile community, the bank and the societies which it finances, will be able to do their part in serving Sind. We must friends; whole heartedly render our best assistance, financial and other to this cooperative movement which I regard as one of the root remedies of many of the ills of the agricultural population.

     

    Text Box:  
Other important problems
I think it is not necessary for me to go into details of those Zamindari problems relating problems to Remission Rules, Fallow Rules and the period of land settlement. These important questions have been treated so thoroughly at the previous Conferences that I do not feel I can add anything more to arguments put forward before you, year after year. The period of settlement has lately been increased from 10 to 20 years but I do hope that before long this period will be lengthened to 30 years. The Fallow Rules I understand, have been slightly amended but we must carry on an unabated agitation for their radical amendment and also for the substitution of a more liberal remission rules.

    I cannot pass over this question which has been for a long time past a subject of complain in Sind and which had been brought forward for discussion at the last Session of Bombay Provincial Council. The utility of the Durbar system itself is open to question; but chair-system in the sense that non-durbaris are not regarded as eligible for a chair when visiting officials is clearly indefensible. I am surprised that a committee is to be appointed by the Government for this subject. It is a matter of ordinary and good manners that a chair be offered to any member of the public who visits an official either for business or any other purpose, and I do not see what will a Committee do? A direct instruction or an order to the officials in Sind should be issued by the Governor in Council pointing out that this practice of asking visitors whether they are eligible for chair is highly annoying to the people, that it must be immediately discontinued and the ordinary rules of etiquette to offer a chair to members of the public must be strictly observed. Offering a chair, to a visitor whether he is eligible for it in the Official Darbar or not, cannot in the least come in the way of the prestige or the dignity of the officials.

    If this practice is not abolished I would certainly go to the length of suggesting our Sindhis to refuse Durbar invitations and entirely stop visiting officials.

    Text Box:  
Canals in Sind
The Government of India and of Bombay have treated Sind most unfairly so far as Canals are concerned. Sind which is most in need of water and canals has received the least attention. Even though pointed out by eminent experts that Canal projects carried out in the Punjaub without adequate measures being taken to insure proper supply of water to Sind, would be detrimental to our province on scientific and technical grounds, the Government practically gave a deaf ear to such warnings. Several schemes have been prepared over and over again for constructing more canals and for securing more water to agricultural land in Sind but in spite of the passage of many years, no actual work has been commenced. They are still projects on paper. The Sukkur Barrage scheme, the most urgent necessity of Sind is still hanging fire and in the meantime the condition of our agriculturists is growing worse, our zamindars are dragged down with debts and in consequence the agriculture suffers with shortage of food, high price and even famine.

    Whilst on the subject of Canals, I cannot but express our extreme dissatisfaction at the meager allotment budgeted for irrigation in the last session of the Imperial Council; a huge sum of seventeen million pounds was allotted to Railways but for Canals only one and half millions. I do admit the importance of efficient railways but at present in India we want food before anything else.

    The Government projects and schemes on account of official routine system, always proceed slow and the perpetual tumbling block of “no finances” always comes in the way and I therefore suggest that the canals in India be allowed to be constructed and developed by private enterprise and capital. There will be no difficulty for us in Sind and anywhere in India to float Joint-stock companies to construct Canals and supply water to agriculturists on easy terms; all such schemes just as is done in cases of light Railway Companies can be placed before the Government for it sanction. Option may be given to the Government to buy up canals from the companies after a period of fifteen or twenty years. Each Company may be granted a span of few miles and joint arrangements similar to those of Railway Companies can be made for water supply by different canal companies throughout the area. A special canal Committee of experts should be appointed to work out various detail schemes for canals in all parts of India and opportunities should be given to private capitalists and financiers to float the Canal Companies and take up construction works without delay. I am sure within a few years we can thus make a marvelous headway in irrigational development in India; the Indian capital and labour will thus be more fully and usefully employed, the young men of India will find a larger scope for utilization of their energy, our impoverished masses will be able to get abundent food and perhaps famine shall be no more.

    My friends, I have come to the end of my Presidential discourse; all throughout the address I have attempted to paint the Government, the officials and ourselves, friends and opponents, in colours in which I can see; whether they are true or false, how far true or how far false, I leave to your judgment. I will not be ashamed to own my misjudgment and correct myself if at any time, I am so convinced.

    I am a dreamer and an idealist and I dream of a glorious India along with a glorious world. I am one of those who believe Providence will not allow us to stand still if we desire to work for our growth. Our country has awakened once again and until its struggles for its place in the present civilization are over, it will not rest.

    I feel anxious at present for more than one reason but I am not despondent; but I feel and urge the necessity of a cool brain side by side with a strong mind and will; let us make due allowance for the present stage of human nature and its limitations, and above all let us trust in God and His Agents. Let us feel the hand of Providence which is everywhere and we will be a free Nation before long, standing side by side with all other nations. I feel that the day when we will stand as equal partners in the British Empire is not far away. I would however beg of you to feel that “SWARAJ or HOME RULE” does not mean our salvation or the end of our unhappiness and misery. I would urge you not to be deluded with the mire of Self Government. Do we not see that Home Rule in England or America has not ended miseries or unhappiness there? Poverty, disease and even autocracy have not ended in England, Canada, America or Australia; slums do not appear to have vanished; hungry faces are still to be seem by thousands. Strikes, labour unrest, bitter party agitation and hatred, religious bigotry have not ended. Capitalists’ ambition to keep the labour suppressed is yet dominant. Turn where you will in the world and you find the one common cause of all miserlyman’s own greed and selfishness to earn money, become rich and secure happiness at the expense of others; and unless man is prepared to change his innerself, his mental condition and his heart, no form of self Government or Home Rule can bring happiness in any country. I do urge friends, that we who aspire to gain Swaraj should be really prepared to give freedom and allow full opportunities to those whom Providence has brought around us within the sphere of our influence in whatever way. Thus alone shall we save our Bharat Land from strikes, famine and unrest. I would urge yon to study the growth of such towns as Port Sunlight, Delectaland and Bradford in England or Dayton in the United States of America and see if we cannot attempt to bring about the co-operation of capital and labour in however humble a way in our own surroundings and sphere to make mankind happier.

    When I read and study the various schemes now being worked in some of the cities of Europe and America, for the welfare of every mother and child in those cities, for aged persons, for the blind and the maimed, for providing healthy homes for all poor persons, for the moral improvement of every man and woman, my heart leaps with joy and yet at the same time with sorrow-I have often sadly murmured, “My land, My motherland when shall such a day come for thee?”

    And my brothers and sisters, therefore do I feel that the real ultimate goal of life is not self-Government which is but a means to that goal. Side by side we have to fix our eyes towards something higher, much nobler, more powerful, more lasting nay Eternal.

    I would also urge not to work upon the maxim “India for Indians only.” We must not take a narrow sense of that expression. India must be not only for Indians but for all those who make India their Home. Let there be no limit as to who can be an Indian. We do not want foreign exploiters to draw away the wealth of India but we would welcome all who make India their own country and work for its welfare as any Indian would. Let us make our country a melting pot for all to become Indians and no one shall remain as a “foreigner” in India; This is the true tradition of our Bharat Land; our scriptures, our Spiritual Teachers have taught us these essentials of happy natural life; and whatever be the struggles for political freedom let us not forget these noble lessons of our Great Teachers without which our land shall never achieve true greatness. How happy would India be if the Britons in India did not remain as mere foreigners as they do at present but would willingly become Indians at Heart and true Christians by faith.

    Before I sit down, my last words, my hope, my appeal to you my friends: let us work together and work hard to make our India once again glorious as in the past, the Land of the Great Devas, the Sages, the Rishis, and the Prophet; then shall truly India’s mission of Swaraj or Home Rule be fulfilled.

     

    VANDE MATRAM

     

     

    The material/data/information can be provided on request.

  • 60.The site Kutte-Ji-Qabar is part of Sindh

    The site Kutte-Ji-Qabar is part of Sindh

    1) Before the Arab invansion, the boundaries of Sindh extend­ed to Kashmir in the North, Makran in the South and Kandhar in the West. But due to various reasons, such as disorders at home conquests by foreigners, local Rulers urge of recognition from the Courts of Delhi and Afghanistan and unfriendly attitude of neighbouring rulers. The boundaries of Sindh have been changing from time to time.

    2) However, as per authorities on the History of Sindh, such as Chachnama, Kuti-ji-Qabar and the area adjacent to it belong to Sindh.

    3) Almost every book written on the History of Sindh, while throwing the light on the boundaries of Sindh proves that Khirthar mountain, in which “Kutte-ji-Qabar” is situated falls
    within the boundaries of Sindh.

    Following books can be ref-ered in this connection:-

    i. “Tahrik-i-Sindh” by Aijaz-ul-Haque Qudusi P-2

    ii. “Sindh Arab period” by Dr.Mumtaz Pathan. P-27 to 30.

    iii. “Janat-ul-Sindh” by Moulai Shedai, P-2 to 8.

    iv. “Sindh Annual-1978” by Public Relations Department, govern­ment of Sindh, P-i.

    v. “Gazetter of Sindh” by HT. Sorley P-i & 2.

    vi. “Economy of Modern Sindh” by Ishrat Hussain, P-9.

    4) A part from this, so many books can be quoted to prove that Khirthar/kohistan is located in Sindh.

    i) Mushtaquer-Rahman in his book “Land and Life in Sindh, Pakistan” on its page 31 writes as under: –

    “Several natural features make sindh a distinct regional entity. Located on the southern flunk of Pakistan, it has Khirther moun­tains in the West and a desert Region in the East”.

    ii) N,C Mujamda, in his book “Explorations InSindh” says on Pages 2 and 3 that: The Khirthar is the most important range of Sindh. At length of about 120 miles of the Khirthar lies in the Larkano District”

    iii) The NEW ENCYCLOPEDIA BRITANNICA in its edition of 1987 on Page 931 provides the information on the information of mountains (Khirthar) with the term of SINDH KOHISTAN” as under:

    11 Sindh Kohistan is located in the West of Sindh Province

    i) Aitken in his GAZETTER OF THE PROVINCE OF SINDH provides evidence that: “The hills of Sindh consist of Khirthar Range to the East, with the laki Range South-East of it and group of smaller hills”

    v) Moulai Shedai in his book JANAT-UL-SINDH repeats the same information and facts (PageNo. 8)

    vi) H.T. Lambrick’s book “SINDH A GENERAL INTRO­DUCTION” consists of a full chapter under the title of “THE SINDH HILL COUNTRY”. He provides the information on the KUTTE-JI-QABAR as

    under: “immediate to the South of the Daryaro plateau the mas­sive peak of Kutte-ji-Qabar, (the Dog’s tomb) rises to 6877 feet, nearly a thousand feet above the general level of this part of range a far-seen land mark in Upper Sindh (Page-40).

    5) It is observed that people due to their affection and affilia­tion give names to every city and site with reference to area or locality. While going through the terminology used by local and European scholars, it appears that Sindhis have given names to many sites, peaks and even mountains. Some of them are as under:

    (a) KHIRTHAR: The word “Khirthar” is combination and compound of two words of Sindhi language, they are “Khir” (Milk) and “Thar” (Desert) means “Milky Desert”.

    b) ACHHO JABAL: The Word “Achho Jabal” is also compound of two words of Sindhi language. They are “Achho” (White) and “Jabal” (Mountain).

    c) DARYARO: The term/word ‘Daryaro’ is also compound of two Sindhi words. They are: “Dar:” (Door) and “Yaro” (Name of person) that means “the pass called after the name of Yaro”.

    d) KAKRIO/KUKRIO: The first line of the hills is spoken of as Kakrio/Kukrio. It is Sindhi word having meaning of “Broken”

    a) KARO: The next ridge/line of the hill is called Karo in Sindhi that means Black hill.

    f) KUTTE-JI-QABAR: “Kutte-ji-Qabar is compound of three Sindhi words: Kutto = Dog, Ji = ‘s(of), Qabar = Tomb, means “Dog’s Tomb”

    The report narrates the story of Kohistan tract as follow: “The district gradually rises from sandy ground of the hilly area, which goes on rising west-wards in various ridges of mountains known as Khirthar Range. It is a range of limestone hills and mountains. They extend along the whole western boundary of the district with a breadth of 12 to 13 miles in a straight line, going from north to south for about 0 to 40 miles till they cross over the limils of adjoining Dadu District situated n the south of this dis­trict. Khirthar Range consists of an ascending series of ridges running generally north to south wit broad, flat valleys in between. These ridges are locally distin­guished by different names. For example the first line hills is spo­ken of as “Kakrio”, i.e. broken; the next 35 “Kara” or black and “Zard” or Yellow”; third as “Pinaro” or saffron coloured, and so on. The highest ridge of the range at its northern extremity is about 5,000 feet above sea level. Towards the south, the height of the ridges decline. The most elevated peak known as “Kutte-ji-Qabar” (dog’s tomb) is 6,878 feet above sea level. Fifteen hundred feet below this, towards north is a plateau known as Darya Waro. These hills afford pasturage for large flocks of sheep and goats. Tithe valley between the moun­tain ridges is green with grass after rains and people belonging to low lying areas start cultiva­tion by raising bunds on the three sides, so that the incoming rain water may be stored for irrigat­ing crops”(P-3).

    iv) “QADEEM SINDH” is an authentic and informative book by the eminent Sindh scholar Mirza Kalich baig. The book furnishes information on sites and cities of Sindh. In its Chapter No:2, it has been told that “Kutte-ji-Qabar” is situated in Larkana District (Page-52).

    Location of Kute-ji-Qabar has been shown! indicated in various maps in the boundaries of Larkana district of Sindh Province. Following are the some examples:

    i) Map of Sindh, published by the Government of Pakistan, in 1984. Contains entry of Symbol in the south of Daryaro in teluka Warah of Larkana District. It stands for the peak! poira of “KUTTE-JI-QABAR”.

    ii) The book “Land and life in Sindh, Pakistan” by Myshtag-ur-Rahman contains a number of maps. Map No 9(page no 33) pro­vides information regarding “Land form” in this map the ”Kohistan” has been included in the teritory of the Sindh Province.

    iii) The physical map of sindh, included in the book “Sindh-A General Introduction” by H. T. Lambrick carries entry about “KUTTE-JI-QABAR”. It has been mentioned in the north of Barani Nai and within the boundaries of Sindh.

    SUPPORTING MATERIAL

    1) Photo-stat copy of the first page of the “LARKANA DISTRICT GAZETTEER”.

    2) Photo-stat copy of the relevant pages from the book “LAND AND LIFE IN SINDH. PAKISTAN”.

    3)Photo-stat copy of the rele­vant pages of the ‘GAZETTER OF THE PROVINCE OF SINDH” by Aitken.

    4) Photo-stat of the chapter “THE SINDH HILL COUNTRY” from H. T. Lambrick’s book SINDH A GEVNERAL INTRODUCTION”.

    5) Photo-stat copy of the Map No.9 from the book “LAND AND LIFE IN SINDH”.

    6) Photo slat copy of MAP of Sindh (Physical) frem H.T. Lambrick’s book.

     

    By: Dr. Dur Muhammad Pathan

  • 59. سنڌ ۾ فڪري ۽ نظرياتي ارتقا جو گهوٽالو

    سنڌ ۾ فڪري ۽ نظرياتي ارتقا جو گهوٽالو

     

    پنهنجي دور تي تنقيدون ڪرڻ، ڪج بحثيءَ تي سندرو ٻڌي گهڻين ڳالهين مان وڏون ڪڍڻ ۽ ڪيترين ڳالهين کان منڪر ٿيڻ، ڪڏهن ڪڏهن پنهنجي ئي عقل جي ڏيوالي ڪڍڻ برابر ٿيندو آهي. پر پنهنجي دور جي دک ۽ درد ۾ شريڪ ٿي، ڪن ٺوس ويچارن کي آڏو رکي، سڄي دور سان مهاڏو اٽڪائڻ به ڪا بري ڳالهه ڪانهي. تاريخ جي هر دور ۾ قومن کي سخت تنقيدون به سهڻيون پونديون آهن ۽ ڪن اٽل انسانن جو مهاڏو به برداشت ڪرڻوپوندو آهي. تاريخ جو تيز وهڪرو پوءِ به بنا روڪ ٽوڪ جي اڳتي وهي ويندو آهي. اهو ڪنهن جو انتظار نه ڪندو آهي. پر اڪيلن ۽ اٽل انسانن جا مهاڏا صدين تائين ياد ڪيا ويندا آهن.

    سقراط اڪيلي سر پنهنجي دور سان مهاڏو اٽڪايو، هن کي ڪنهن به نه ٻڌو، تاريخ جو وهڪرو به اڳي جيان تيزيءَ سان وهندو ويو. ڪنهن به سقراط جو انتظار نه ڪيو، خود سقراط به وقت ۽ حالتن کي روڪي نه سگهيو، ليڪن تاريخ اهو فيصلو ڏنو ته سقراط سچ تي هو. انساني تاريخ نئين سج نوان سقراط پيدا ڪندي رهي آهي، مذهب ، سياست، ادب ۽ زندگي جي هر هڪ شعبي ۾ روز بروز اڪيلا، اٽل ۽ مهاڏو اٽڪائيندڙ انسان پيدا ٿيندا رهن ٿا ۽ اسان ملي جلي سندن موت آڻيندا رهون ٿا. پر جيڪڏهن کين ٻڌو وڃي ان کان سواءِ دوست ۽ دشمن جي ڳالهه کي هينئن سان هنڊايو وڃي ته هوند هڪ طرف اسان جي ڊڪشنري مان ڪج بحثي جو خاتمو ٿي وڃي ۽ ٻئي طرف پاڻ کي ڏسڻ پرکڻ جو به موقعو ملي وڃي.

    تنقيد ۽ مخالفت ڀلي ته سچ تي مبني نه هجي ، پر اها به اڪارتي ڪو نه ٿيندي آهي. ڇو ته دوست سدائين عيبن تي پڙدو وجهندا آهن، پر دشمن کي سدائين غلطين، ڪمزورين ۽ براين جي تلاش هوندي آهي. مخالف يا دشمن ئي ته پنهنجي تنقيد ۽ مخالفت جي آرسي ڏيکاري، اسان کي پنهنجي اوڳڻن، عيبن غلطين ۽ ڪمزورين کان باخبر ڪندو آهي. واقعي اهي انسان بدنصيب هوندا آهن، جن کي دشمن نه ٿا ملن. مخالفت ئي ته ”وجود“ ۽ ”حيثيت“ جي شاهدي ۽ تصديق ٿيندي آهي.”ڪارو“ نه هجي ته ”اڇي“کي ڪير سڃاڻي؟ ”تنقيد“ ۽ ”مخالفت“ نه هجي ته پنهنجي جيءُ ۾ جهاتي پائڻ جو موقعو ئي ڪو نه ملي.

    آئون ڪنهن ڪج بحثيءَ جو آغاز ڪرڻ نه ٿو گهران، نه وري پاڻ کي پنهنجي دور جو اڪيلو ۽ اٽل انسان ڄاڻي پوري دنيا سان مهاڏو اٽڪايان ٿو، نه وري دشمن ۽ ڌاريي جو ڪردار ادا ڪري، اجايو وِڏن ڪڍڻ تي سندرو ٻڌان ٿو . پر اهو به ايمان اٿم ته هن دور هزارها مصيبتن، مشڪلاتن، مسئلن ۽ مجبورين باوجود حق ۽ سچ جون انيڪ روايتون قائم ڪيون آهن ۽ ڪيترين نظرياتي ڳالهين ۾ پيش رفت ڪئي آهي. سوچ جا نت نوان ذريعا ڳولهي لڌا آهن. ذهني ۽ فڪري ارتقا جو سفر جاري آهي. هن دور جو هر اول دستو پنهنجي پنهنجي منزل طرف اڳتي وڌي رهيو آهي. پر موجوده حالتن جو جائزو ڪنهن ٻئي رخ کان به وٺي سگهجي ٿو. جيڪڏهن ارتقا جي هن سفر جو ڪو مسافر اهو سوال ڪري ته ”اسان جي رفتار ڪهڙي آهي ۽ اسان ڪنهن طرف پيا وڃون؟“ ته هن تي ميار رکي نه ٿي سگهجي. ڇو ته هن کي ”ڄاڻ حاصل ڪرڻ“ جو فطري حق حاصل آهي. هن کي جيڪڏهن ڪو خدشو، وهم يا غلط فهمي ٿي پئي آهي ته اهي ڳالهيون پڻ عين انساني فطرت جي مطابق آهن. ان ڪري هن کي اهي فطري حق ملڻ گهرجن. هن کي اطمينان بخش جواب نه ڏيڻ سان نه ارتقا جو سفر رڪجي ويندو ۽ نه وري ڪنهن سرواڻ جي صحت يا حيثيت تي اثر پوندو، پر جيڪڏهن اختلاف يا سوال ڪندڙ جو خدشو ڪن ٺوس شاهدين، حقيقتن ۽ بنيادن تي ٻڌل آهي ته پوءِ ٻڌي اڻ ٻڌي ڪرڻ ”اجتماعي آپگهات“ ڪرڻ برابر ٿيندو.

    مفروضو:

    اسان موجوده دور ۾ جيڪا نظرياتي ترقي ڪئي آهي، ان تي فقط ڳاٽ اوچي ڪرڻ سان ڳالهه نه ٿي جُڙي. انهيءَ ڪاميابيءَ جي جائزي وٺڻ لاءِ هيئن به مفروضو قائم ڪري سگهجي ٿو ته اسان جو دور نظرياتي گهوٽالي جو شڪار آهي. اسان نظرياتي طور تي ترقي ڪرڻ بدران تنزل طرف وڌي رهيا آهيون. اسان جي ذهني، فڪري ۽ نظرياتي ارتقا جو عمل ته جاري آهي. پر ان جو رخ صحيح طرف ڏانهن ڪونهي. ان ڪري انديشوآهي ته اسان اهي ”گڏيل مقصد“ گهربل يا مقرر ڪيل وقت ۾ ماڻي نه سگهون، جنهن لاءِ هر ڪو لکيو پڙهيو، باشعور ۽ ”روشن آئيندي“ جو متوالو ڪوشش ڪري رهيو آهي.

    منهنجي خيال ۾ نظرياتي ارتقا جي سفر ۾ اقتدار ۾ آيل سياستدان، حڪومت، اقتدار کان ٻاهر سياستدان، استاد، شاگرد ۽ قلم ڪاراهم ڪردار ادا ڪندا آهن. اهي بيشڪ نظرين جا محرڪ ڪونهن پر نظرياتي سفر ۾ پنهنجي پنهنجي حيثيت رکن ٿا. هو مختلف يا ڪن حالتن ۾ متضاد محاذن جا سرواڻ ٿيندا آهن.

    انهن سرواڻن مان اسان هتي فقط اديب، ليکڪ، شاعر، محقق ۽ صحافي جي ڪردار ۽ خدمتن جي حوالي سان پنهنجي مفروضي کي پرکڻ جي ڪوشش ڪنداسين. اسان جي انهيءَ مفروضي جو ٻيو جز هي آهي ته ”سنڌ ۾ نظرياتي گهوٽالي“ جو اهم ڪارڻ اسان جا اهي قلم ڌڻي، ادبي دنيا ۽ انهن جا اصول آهن. اسان وٽ جيترو نظرياتي ڪم ٿيو آهي. ان جا بهتر نتيجا نڪري ٿي سگهيا. پر جيڪڏهن اسان جي قلم ڌڻين باهمي افهام تفهيم ۽ سهڪار کان ڪم ورتو هجي ها ۽ انهن اوڻاين کي پنهنجي نگريءَ مان خارج ڪيو هجي ها ته حالتون اڃان ٻيون هجن ها . جن جو مختصر ذڪر هنن ئي ورقن ۾ ڪيو ويندو.

    ايئن ڪو نه آهي ته مفروضي تي ٻڌل هن مطالعي ذريعي ڪو قلم ڌڻين خلاف ڪات ڪهاڙا استعمال ڪيا ويا آهن، پر هي مطالعو نظرياتي گهوٽالي وارين حالتن ۾ سندن ڪردار، مجبورين ۽ مسئلن کي به سمجهڻ ۾ مدد ڏيندو.

    گهوٽالي جا اهڃاڻ:

    تضادن جي هن دنيا ۾ اسان جي قوم ستن نظرياتي ڪئمپن ۾ ورهايل نظر اچي ٿي، اهي آهن؛مذهب پسند،قوم پرست،ترقي پسند، موقعي پرست، مايوس، غير جانبدار ۽ غير نظرياتي ڪئمپون. انهن ڪئمپن مان ٽن جي حيثيت مخلتف ۽ متضاد مڪاتب فڪر جي آهي. جيڪي آهن؛ مذهب پسند، ترقي پسند ۽ قوم پرست. اهي ٽيئي مڪتب فڪر پنهنجي پنهنجي حساب ۽ طريقي سان سنڌ ۾ نظرياتي تبليغ ۾ مصروف آهن ۽ قوم جي لکيل پڙهيل طبقي جي اڪثريت انهن سان لاڳاپيل آهي. اهي ٽئي مڪاتبِ فڪر پنهنجي پنهنجي طريقي ڪار، رنگ ڍنگ ۽ آئيندي جي منصوبن جي حوالي سان ايترا ته پڌرا، چٽا ۽ واضح آهن، جو هر ڪو ماڻهو آسانيءَ سان انهن جو خاڪو چٽي سگهي ٿو. باقي چار ڪئمپون وضاحت طلب آهن. ”موقعي پرستن“ مان منهنجي مراد انهن ماڻهن جي آهي، جيڪي پنهنجي ذاتي مفادن خاطر وقت ۽ حالتن سان گڏ سانڊي جيان رنگ بدلائي سگهندا آهن. ”موقعي پرست“، زندگي جي ڪنهن مخصوص مڪتبه فڪر سان واسطو نه ٿا رکن. پر هر هنڌ ۽ هر شعبي ۾ موجود آهن. انهن جي ڄاڻ سڃاڻ اها ئي آهي ته کين ڪڏهن به ڪوسو واءُ نه لڳندو آهي. مادي طور تي هو روز بروز وڌندا ويندا آهن. انا ، عزت نفس، اصول ۽ نظريو هنن لاءِ بي معنيٰ ڳالهيون هونديون آهن. هنن جي نظر فقط ۽ فقط ڌن، عهدي يا رتبي تي هوندي آهي.

    ”مايوسين جي ڪئمپ“ وري اهڙن ماڻهن جي پناهه جي جاءِ هوندي آهي، جيڪي انسان کي فرشتو ڄاڻي ويهندا آهن. هو پنهنجي شخصيت جي تعمير اخلاقي يا مذهبي قدرن مطابق ڪندا آهن. يقين، ڀروسي، وفاداري ۽ بي لوثي کي ئي سڀ ڪجهه ڄاڻندا آهن. پر انهن سان گڏ اميدن ۽ آسرن مان به جان آجي نه ڪري سگهندا آهن. انساني فطرت ۾ سمايل خاميون جهڙوڪ :دوکو ۽ مطلب پرستيءَ کي وساري ويهندا آهن. پر انهن اوڳڻن جو نشانو بڻجي مايوس ٿي ويندا آهن. ”غير جانبدار“ ۽ ”مايوس“ ۾ اهو فرق آهي ته غير جانبدار انسان کي انسان سمجهندو آهي. پنهنجي تجربن ۽ مشاهدن جي بنيادن تي اميد ۽ آسري تي گهٽ ڀاڙيندو آهي، هو جتي ٻين جي چڱائيءَ جو منڪر نه ٿو ٿئي اتي اهو به ڌيان ۾ رکي ٿو ته ساڳيو انسان مدائي به ڪري سگهي ٿو. مطلب ته تصوير جا ٻئي رخ هن جي اڳيان هوندا آهن. هو ڪنهن به ڳالهه کي اکيون ٻوٽي قبول نه ڪندو آهي. پنهنجو پير ڇنڊي ڦوڪي کڻندو آهي. توازن قائم ڪرڻ جي ڪوشش ڪندو آهي، پر اها غير جانبداري ويڙهاند وارين حالتن ۾ کيس ڳچيءَ ۾ پوندي آهي. ڇو ته ڪو به هن کي پنهنجو ڪو نه ڄاڻندو آهي. بلڪ متضاد گروهن جي عذاب ۽ عتاب جو پهريون نشانو غير جانبدار بڻبو آهي. امن وارين حالتن ۾ پڻ ٻئي ڌريون کيس نظر انداز ڪنديون رهنديون آهن. هو نظرياتي تبليغ ۽ تحريڪ ۾ سڌو سنئون ڀاڱي ڀائيوار ٿيڻ بدران اڪثر ڪري نقاد جو ڪردار ادا ڪندو آهي.

    ”غير نظرياتي ڪئمپ“ ۾ وري اهي ماڻهو اچي وڃن ٿا، جيڪي وقت ۽ حالتن تي نظر نه ٿا رکن . هو معاشي طور تي پاڻ هرتو زندهه رهي سگهن ٿا، يا وري معاشي طور تي ايترو ته ڪنگال آهن جو نظرين، قدرن ۽ اصولن بدران نعرن ۽ وعدن پٽاندڙ پنهنجون وفاداريون بدلائيندا رهندا آهن ۽ هنن جو نظرياتي بنيادي مطالعو يا مشاهدو نه هوندو آهي. البته سندن فطرت ۾ طبقاتي شعور جو دٻيل يا دٻايل احساس ضرور موجود هوندو آهي. ان ڪري سنجيده فڪري ۽ نظرياتي تربيت کين غير نظرياتي ڪئمپ کان ٻاهر ڪڍي سگهندي آهي.

    اسان جي ڌرتيءَ جا ٽئي مکيه مڪتب فڪر، يعنيٰ ”قوم پرست“، ”مذهب پرست“ ۽ ”ترقي پسند“ انهيءَ حقيقت کي مڃين يا نه مڃين، پر سنڌ ۾ اهي باقي چار نظرياتي ڪئمپون هر حالت ۾ موجود آهن، بلڪ نظرين جي اها ست رنگي انڊلٺ ته بلڪ هر مڪتبه فڪر ۾ موجود آهي اڃا وڌيڪ غور ڪرڻ سان معلوم ٿيندو ته پر اسان جي معاشري جو هر هڪ فرد پنهنجي زندگيءَ جي مختلف موڙن تي انهن متضاد نظرين جي پلصراط تان گذري ٿو.

    ان ڪري سنڌ ۾ واضح طور تي نظرياتي ارتقا ٿي نه سگهي آهي. فقط نظرياتي گروهه آهن، جيڪي وقت ۽ حالتن مطابق سسندا، ڦوڪبا، وڌندا ۽ گهٽبا رهن ٿا. ”جذباتي ڄمار“ ۾ هر ڪو ماڻهو ”قوم پرستيءَ“ جون ڳالهيون ڪري ٿو. ان جي وڌيڪ ويجهو وڃڻ ۽ سنجيده ٿيڻ سان، ”قوم پرستيءَ“ واري نظرئي تي مڙهيل اوڻايون جهڙوڪ : تنظيم جو فقدان، خود احتسابي تنقيد جي اڻ هوند، ذات پات جو اثر، غير واضح طريقي ڪار ۽ ڪارڪنن جي شخصيت جي معمولي تربيت وغيره کيس مايوس ڪن ٿيون ۽ هو ”ترقي پسنديءَ“ طرف رخ ڪري ٿو. هتي هن کي پنهنجي عمل جو جاگرافيائي ميدان ڪشادو ۽ وسيع نظر اچي ٿو. مٿس ذات پات ۽ رنگ نسل جو اثر نه ٿو مڙهيو وڃي. هو هڪ هٽيءَ واري گهٽن محسوس نه ٿو ڪري. هو جيڪو لکي يا ڳالهائي ٿو ان کي پڙهيو يا ٻڌو وڃي ٿو. هن کي تنقيد جو حق ملي ٿو. هو غير تربيت يافته ۽ آئيندي جي سوچ کان وانجهيل اڳواڻن جي قيادت کان آزاد ٿي وڃي ٿو. سنڌ ۾ جيڪڏهن ادبي ميدان ۾ نه ته سياسي ميدان ۾ گهڻي کان گهڻا ”ترقي پسند“ سنڌ جي ”قوم پرست“ مڪتبه فڪر مان پيدا ٿيل آهن. يعنيٰ اهي اڳ يا ابتداء ۾ ”قوم پرست“ هئا ۽ پوءِ ان سان اختلاف ڪري خارجي سازگار حالتن ۽ پر ڪشش ماحول کان متاثر ٿي ان کان الڳ ٿيندا ويا ۽ پنهنجون پنهنجون وڃي نظرياتي ڪئمپون جوڙيائون. آخر ۾ انهن جي عمل جو جاگرافيائي ميدان وڃي هڪ جيترو ۽ هڪ جهڙو ٿيو. انهن حالتن کي ڌيان ۾ رکندي ”قوم پرست“ مڪتب فڪر پاڻ وٽ”ترقي پسنديءَ“ جي ڪنهن حد تائين گنجائش پيدا ڪئي. ان ڪري سنڌ ۾ ڪيترا اهڙا مهربان به ملن ٿا جن ”ترقي پسند قوم پرستي“جي تبليغ کي اهميت ڏني. هنن حالتن وري سنڌ ۾ ”قوم پرست“ ۽ ”ترقي پسند“ مڪتب فڪرن کي ٽن حصن ۾ ورهايو.

    ”مذهب پسند“ مڪتب فڪر اڳ ئي حريف ۽ متضاد گروهن ۾ ورهايل آهي. شيعا، سني ۽ وهابي هڪ ٻئي کي دين ڌرم کان ئي ٻاهر ڪڍيو ويٺا آهن. انهن مان ڪيترا وري اهڙا عقيدي ۾ راسخ آهن جو ٿوري ڳالهه تي به نڪاح ٽٽڻ جي فتويٰ ڪڍڻ ۾ دير نه ٿا لائن . سي به وري وقت ۽ حالتن مطابق پاڻ کي ”قوم پرست“ يا ”ترقي پسند“ ثابت ڪرڻ جي چڪر ۾ سرٽيفڪيٽن ۽ شاهدين جي تلاش ۾ به مصروف ٿي ويندا آهن.

    نظرياتي طور تي سنڌ چون چون جو مربو ٿي پئي آهي. سنڌ جي تاريخ ۾ اهڙو نظرياتي گهوٽالو ڪڏهن پيدا ڪونه ٿيو، سنڌ ڪڏهن به اهڙا ماڻهو پيدا ڪو نه ڪيا، جيڪي نظرياتي طور تي اڌ ڪاٺ جا اڌ لوهه جا محسوس ٿين، سو به وري حالتن جي گهڻ رخي دٻاءُ ۾.

    حالتون: حالتن جو اهو گهڻ رخو دٻاءُ نه فقط ڳنڀير، پر هاڃيڪار پڻ آهي .پنهنجي سماجي تاڃي پيٽي ۾ بيروزگاري، غربت، جهالت ۽ ڏاڍ جون اڻ ڳڻيون تندون ۽ تارون موجود آهن. عملدار رعيت آزار جو عنايتون ته اڳ ئي گهڻيون هيون، پر هاڻي وري ڪلاشنڪوف ۽ هيروئن عوام کي نهن تي نچائڻ شروع ڪيو آهي.

     

     

  • 58. انسان ،انسان آهي

    انسان انسان آهي

     

    هن دنيا جو وڏي کان وڏو طلسم اهو آهي جو ڏينهن ۽ رات، نيڪي ۽ برائي، سچ ۽ ڪوڙ، گناهه ۽ ثواب ۽ اهڙيون مڙيوئي متضاد خواهه مخالف شيون منجهيل سٽ جيان پاڻ ۾ مليون پيون آهن. ان ڪري ڪڏهن ڪڏهن انهن ۾ فرق محسوس ڪندي به انسان منجهي پوندو آهي.تان جو هن جي عملن جي”ڏينهن“ مان ”رات“ ڦٽي نڪرندي آهي. ”نيڪي“ وڃي ”برائي“ تي پهچندي آهي ۽ ثواب بدلجي گناهه ٿي پوندو آهي. ان ڪري هن جادو نگريءَ ۾ ڇنڊي ڦوڪي پير کڻڻو پئي ٿو. ته جيئن ”ڏينهن“ مان ”رات“ ٿيڻ بدران ”رات“ کي ”ڏينهن“ ۾ بدلايو وڃي. انهيءَ حساب سان دنيا به ڄڻ هڪ پلصراط آهي، جنهن کي ساڃهه، تميز ، فرق ۽ سوچ جي سواريءَ کانسواءِ پار ڪرڻ ڏکيو ٿي پئي ٿو.

    بنهه اهڙي نموني سان انسان به پنهنجي وجود ۾ هڪ مڪمل ڪائنات آهي، جنهن ۾ نيڪي ۽ بدي، سچ ۽ ڪوڙ، گناهه ۽ ثواب جهڙا ٻج سندس فطرت جي زمين ۾ ڇٽيا پيا آهن.دنيا ۾ گهڻي کان گهڻا قتل، وڳوڙ ۽ قهر انساني فطرت جي نا آشنائي ڪري ٿيا آهن، ان ڪري انساني فطرت کي سمجهڻ ۽ قبولڻ ضروري ٿي پئي ٿو.

    ڪن انسان کي ”آدرش“ ۽ ”فرشتو“ ڄاتو. هن کي هر ڪنهن برائي کان پاڪ ۽ صاف ڄاتو . هن سان اميدون ۽ آسرا وابسته ڪيا. هر موڙ تي هن مان چڱائي جي اميد رکي .پر ڏسندي ڏسندي سندن اهو ”آدرش“ هڪ پٿر جي بت ۾ بدلجي ويو. نتيجي ۾ اميدون ۽ آسرن جون پيشانيون بت سان ٽڪرائجي رت ۾ ريٽيون ٿي ويون.صدين کان ايئن ٿيندو پيو اچي.خاص طور تي ”سياست “ ۽ ” محبت“ ۾ انسان جو آدرشي تصور هن کي مافوق الفطرت بڻائي، دنيا کي دوکي ، فريب ۽ مڪاريءَ جي نگري بڻائيندو آيو آهي. انسان جي انهيءَ ئي ”آدرشي تصور“ هر دور ۾ مايوسيءَ کي جنم ڏنو. جڏهن ڪنهن جي دل گهريو ”آدرش“ هن جي دل وٽان نه نڪتوته ، چاهيندڙ مايوسيءَ جو چولوپائي وڃي ڪنڊ وسائي يا ٻئي جهان ۾ پهتو. ”سياست“ ۾ انسان پاڻ کي ”آدرش“ جي روپ ۾ پيش ڪندو آهي. عوام جي مجبورين ۽ ضرورتن جو اندازو لڳائي ، کيس اميدن ۽ آسرن جا سبز باع ڏيکاريندو آهي. اهڙي ريت اقتدار خواهه اختيار جي مسند تائين پهچي ويندو آهي. ”جديد سياست“ کان اڳ جڏهن ڏاڍ، ڏمر، ورثي يا ٻين ڳالهين ڪري ڪوئي حڪومت جي واڳ پنهنجي هٿ ڪندو هو، ان وقت ۽ ان دور ۾ ”لٺ ۽ چٺ“ جي حڪمت عملي اختيار ڪري پاڻ کي ”الله جو پاڇو“ تسليم ڪرائيندو هو، يعنيٰ ته هو ” مافوق الفطرت هستي“ جي جامي پائڻ جي ڪوشش ڪندو هو. ان ڪري ئي ”بادشاهه ست ولين برابر“ وارو نظريو پيدا ٿيو.

    انسان جو ”آدرشي تصور“ محبت خواهه سياست جي ميدان ۾ هاڃيڪار رهيو آهي. ڇو ته انسان انسان آهي. هو ”مافوق الفطرت هستي“ ٿي نه ٿو سگهي. خطا اوس ئي هن کان ٿيندي. ان ڪري انسان کي ”خطا“ کان خالي سمجهڻ پاڻ سان دوکي ڪرڻ برابر آهي. مايوسي انهيءَ تصور جي پيداوار آهي. جيئن انسان کي بي عيب ۽ آدرش ڄاڻڻ غلطي آهي. تيئن ان کي فقط ۽ فقط ڏوهي ، ڪريل، پاڻ کان گهٽ ۽ گنهگارڄاڻڻ به غلط آهي. اهي ٻئي تصور انسان کي ڄڻ اڌوري ۽ اڻپوري حيثيت ۾ قبول ڪن ٿا.

    انسان کي گهٽ ڄاڻڻ، ڏوهي محسوس ڪرڻ، گنهگار، وحشي، بدتهذيب، ڄٽ، جاهل ۽ اناڙي سمجهڻ مان وڏو قهر اهو ٿئي ٿو ته جهيڙا ۽ فساد ٿين ٿا، قتل ۽ خون ٿين ٿا، لڙايون ۽ جنگيون لڳن ٿيون. جڏهن انسان کي ”جاهل ۽ ڄٽ“ ڄاڻي خالي توٻرو سمجهي ديني ۽ مذهبي مبلغ کيس پنهنجي نيڪ نصيحتن ۽ وسيعتن سان ڀرڻ جي ناڪام ڪوشش ڪن ٿا ته هو ”مبلغ“ ۽ ”تبليغ“ کان سواءِ مذهب، اخلاق ۽ علم سان به نفرت ڪرڻ لڳي ٿو. جڏهن سياسي، مذهبي، سماجي يا اقتصادي سبقت حاصل ڪري ڪو گروهه ٻئي گروهه ، فرد يا قوم کي بدتهذيب ۽ وحشي ڄاڻڻ شروع ڪري ٿو ته انسانن جا خالي هٿ ڪلاشنڪوفن ۾ بدلجي وڃن ٿا. جڏهن ڪا قوم يا گروهه يقين جي حد تائين پاڻ کي حاڪم ۽ ٻين کي محڪوم ڄاڻي ٿو ته پوءِ غلاميءَ جي زنجيرن ٽٽڻ جو سلسلو شروع ٿئي ٿو.

    ايئن اهڙي ريت صدين کان وٺي انسان کي اڌورو تسليم ڪرڻ، ڪڏهن ڀلو ته ڪڏهن برو ڄاڻڻ، تباهي ۽ برباديءَ کي جنم ڏيندو رهيو آهي. انهن ٻنهي تصورن انساني تاريخ ۾ وڏي اٿل پٿل پئي پيدا ڪئي آهي. سماجي اختلافن کان وٺي قومي وڳوڙن تائين انهيءَ اٿل پٿل جا اثر محسوس ڪيا ويندا آهن.

    انهن ٻنهي تصورن خلاف ردِ عمل ۾ وڏيون تحريڪون به هليون. سنڌ ۾ ”تصوف“ جي تحريڪ انهيءَ پس منظر ۾ جنم ورتو. اها هڪ تاريخي حقيقت آهي ته ”تصوف جي تحريڪ“ سنڌي معاشري ۾ اڳتي هلي هاڃيڪار اثر وڌا جن کي هن وقت به محسوس ڪيو وڃي ٿو. مگر اها تحريڪ ان دور جي مجبوري هئي ۽ ضرورت هئي. هن تحريڪ ان ڪري صحيح رخ نه ورتو ، جو ان جوکم واري تحريڪ ۾ اسان جي ديني عالمن حصو نه ورتو ڇو ته انهن مان ڪن وڃي درٻار ۽ سرڪار ۾ عزت ۽ احترام جي ڪوڙي سڪي لاءِ بادشاهن يا حڪمرانن کي الله جو پاڇو سڏڻ شروع ڪيو، ۽ ڪن مڪتبن خواهه مدرسن ۾ ويهي درسي ڪتابن پڙهائڻ ۽ تحقيق ڪرڻ کي شعور جي سج اڀارڻ برابر ڄاتو. ڪي وري پنهنجي تن، من ۽ ڌن جي بچائڻ ۾ تصوف جي انقلابي تحريڪ کان پري رهيا . ان ڪري” تصوف جي تحريڪ“ کي عالمن جو هر اول دستو نه ملي سگهيو ، ۽ اها ردِ عمل طور شديد ٿيندي وئي. ڄڻ ته ڪنهن درد جي دوا ايئن ٿي جو مريض کي نشو ته ڏنو ويو، ليڪن ان جي آپريشن ڪنهن نه ڪئي!.

    ”تصوف جي تحريڪ“ جا دور رس اثر اڄ به اسان جي ڳچيءَ ۾ رسي جيان وڌا وڃن ٿا. اهوئي سبب آهي جو شاهه ڪريم، شاهه لطيف، شاهه عنايت، سچ سرمست ۽ مڙني عظيم شاعرن کي فقط ۽ فقط صوفي شاعرن جي روپ ۾ پيش ڪيو وڃي ٿو.

    ”تصوف“ پنهنجي دور جي ”ردِ عمل“ جي حيثيت واري تحريڪ هئي. هيءَ تحريڪ تڏهن شروع ٿي، جڏهن اقتصادي ، سياسي ۽ سماجي غلامي کي عوام مٿان مسلط ڪرڻ ۽ ان کي صحيح ثابت ڪرڻ لاءِ مذهب سياست جي پٺڀرائي ڪئي. مذهب ۽ سياست کي عوام دشمني خاطر استعمال ڪيو ويو. بادشاهه يا حڪمران کي ”الله جا خليفا نه پر پاڇي“ طور مسلط ڪرڻ جي ڪوشش ڪئي وئي، درٻاري ۽ سرڪاري ماڻهن کي الله جا نيڪ ۽ چونڊيل ٻانها ڪري پيش ڪيو ويو ۽ عوام جي وڏي اڪثريت کي جاهل، غلام ۽ نڪمو ڄاتو ويو. جڏهن انسان اشرف المخلوقات جي ائين توهين ٿيڻ لڳي ته صوفين ٻين مقصدن واري صوفياڻي تحريڪ شروع ڪئي : هڪ مقصد مطابق انهن ادارن، نظرين ۽ انهن سان وابسته شخصيتن خلاف آواز بلند ڪيو ويو، جن عوام ۽ عام انسان کي گهٽ ڄاڻڻ شروع ڪيو هو. هنن “مذهب“ ۽ ”سياست“ کي پنهنجي تنقيد جو نشانو بڻايو.جيئن ته ”مذهب“ استحصالي مقصدن حاصل ڪرڻ لاءِ ”سياست“ جي ساٿي طور غلط استعمال ڪيو ويو،ان ڪري صوفي بزرگن جي گهڻي ڪاوڙ ”مذهب“ ۽” مذهبي ٺيڪيدارن“ خلاف ٿي پئي. هنن جي اها نيت ڪانه هئي ته ڪو ”مذهب“ جي اداري خلاف لاهي پاهي ڪات ڪهاڙا کڻجن. پر جيئن ته ”مذهبي ٺيڪيداري“ درٻاري ۽ سرڪاري نوازشن حاصل ڪرڻ ۽ انسان کي گهٽ ثابت ڪرڻ جو واپار بڻجي وئي ، ان ڪري هنن صوفين مذهبي ٺيڪيدارن جي هڪ هٽي ٽوڙڻ لاءِ روزي، نماز، حج، زڪوات جي ظاهري مگر باطني طور منافقي تي ٻڌل عملن جي مذمت ڪرڻ شروع ڪئي.جڏهن ظالم ۽ جابر حڪمران خلاف آواز بلند ڪرڻ تي عوام کي دوزخ پهچائڻ جهڙيون فتوائون ڏنيون ويون ته صوفي بزرگن جنت“ کي ”دلاسو“ ۽ ”دوزخ “ کي ”دڙڪي“ طور پيش ڪيو. ”هنن روزا نمازون اي پڻ چڱو ڪم“ ته ضرور چيو پر هي به ٻڌايو ته ”اهو ڪو ٻيو فهم، جنهن سان پسجي پرينءَ کي.“

    جيئن ته عوام کي جاهل، ڄٽ، غلام ۽ ظالم حڪمرانن جي ٻڌي ٻانهي طور پيش ڪيو ويو ۽ جابر حڪمرانن کي الله جو پاڇو بڻايو ويو ته ان وقت صوفي بزرگن وري عوام کي احساس ڪمتريءَ مان ڪڍڻ لاءِ آواز بلند ڪيو ته ”نائين نيڻ نهار، تو ۾ ديرو دوست جو“ . تان جو ڳالهه کي اڃا به کولي هيئن چيو ويو ته ”ايجها ڪم ڪريجي، جنهن وچ الله آپ بڻيجي.“ صوفي بزرگن ظالم ۽ آڱرين تي ڳڻجڻ جيترن ماڻهن جي عوام يعنيٰ اڪثريت تي ناجائز حڪمراني خلاف ايڏي ته بغاوت ڪئي جو ان جي نتيجي ۽ اثر هيٺ سچل سرمست ايئن به چيو ته ”ڇا ٿيون ڀانئيو جيڏيون، آهيان رب ستار.“ اهو سڀ ڪجهه انهيءَ ڪري ٿيو جو انسان کي انسان نه ڄاتو ويو. هن جي نالي مٽ ڪئي وئي. انهيءَ خال کي ڀرڻ لاءِ هن پاڻ کي اهو ڪجهه سڏايو، جيڪو ڪڏهن به ٿي نه ٿو سگهي.

    انهيءَ مثالن مان اها ڳالهه ظاهر ٿئي ٿي ته جيڪڏهن ۽ جڏهن به انسان اڌورو ۽ اڻپورو ڄاتو ويندو . هن کي فقط ”آدرش“ يا فقط “خراب“ ڄاتو ويندو ته اهو انسان خلم ٻاري وجهي ٿو. ان ڪري ڀلو انهيءَ ۾ آهي ته ”انسان کي انسان“ ئي ڄاتو وڃي.

    انسان کي اڌوري ۽ اڻپوري مڃڻ جي آزار مان اڄوڪي دور ۾ به اسان جند نه ڇڏائي آهي. پاڻ انهيءَ ڳالهه تي بحث نه ٿا ڪريون ته موجوده جوڙ جڪ ۾ اسان جي قوم کي ڪيترو تهذيب يافته ڄاتو وڃي ٿو. اها ڳالهه واضح آهي ته ٻين گروهن جو اسان جي قوم سان ورتاءُ اهڙو آهي، جنهن مان اهو ئي ثبت ٿئي ٿو ته پاڻ کي اڌورو ۽ اڻپورو يعنيٰ ڄٽ، جاهل، تهذيب کان ڪورو، وحشي، ويڙهاڪ، ڦورو، گهٽ ۽ بيڪار ڄاتو وڃي ٿو. ان جا جيڪي نتيجا نڪرڻا آهن، ان لاءِ تاريخ اڳ ئي اڻ ڳڻيا مگر هڪ جهڙا فيصلا ٻڌائي چڪي آهي.

    مگر داخلي طور تي اسان پنهنجي قوم ۽ سماجي سطح تي پڻ اهو تاثر ڏئي رهيا آهيون ته اسان جي قوم جو هر هڪ فرد اڌورو ۽ اڻپورو آهي. اهوئي سبب آهي جو ديني عالمن کي عوام کان ڄڻ ته ڪراهت اچي ٿي ۽ هو پنهنجي ئي عوام کي گنهگار ڄاڻن ٿا. دنياوي عالم ۽ دانشور وري نئين نسل کي ناتجربيڪار ۽ جذباتي ڄاڻي ٿو.ڪامورو باقي عوام کي پنهنجو غلام ڄاڻي ٿو. ڌن ڌڻي غري عوام کي انسان ئي ڪو نه سمجهي ٿو. جڏهن اندروني طور تي اسان انسان کي انسان نٿا سمهجون تڏهن بيروني طور تي ٻيا گروهه اسان جي قوم کي ڪجهه نٿا ڄاڻن ۽ اسان ويٺا اجتماعي سزا ڀوڳيون.

    خارجي طور ٻين گروهن ۽ قومن طرفان جيڪو ٿي رهيو آهي، ان تي مايوس ٿيڻ جي ڳالهه ڪانهي ڇو ته تاريخ جا سبق اسان جي اڳيان آهن، پر جنهن ڳالهه تي ويچارڻ ۽ غور ڪرڻ جي ضرورت اها ئي آهي ته اسان داخلي طور تي انسان کي انسان ڄاڻون ٿا يا نه؟

    انسان کي انسان ڄاڻڻ جو مطلب آهي انسان کي پنهنجي فطرت جي روشنيءَ ۾ قبول ڪرڻ. خامين ۽ خوبين سميت، چڱاين ۽ مداين سميت، بنهه ايئن جيئن شاهه عبداللطيف ڀٽائي قبول ڪندي چيو هو ته ” جيها جي تيها، مون مارون مڃيا.“ انسان کي انهيءَ وقت تائين انسان طور قبول ڪري نه ٿو سگهجي، جسيتائين پنهنجي جيءُ ۾ جهاتي پائجي. جيڪڏهن ڪو انسان پاڻ ڪڏهن خطا نه ڪري، ڪنهن کان غلطي نه ٿي هجي، پاڻ پاڪ، صاف، بي عيب، ڪامل ۽ مڪمل هجي ته هو ٻئي تي ميار رکي سگهي ٿو. ٻئي کي اڌورو ۽ اڻپورو ڄاڻي سگهي ٿو. اها منزل وري ڪوئي تڏهن ماڻي سگهي ٿو، جڏهن”انساني تاريخ“ مان ”انسان خطا جو پتلو آهي“ جا لفظ خارج ڪري ڏيکاري.

    نيڪي ۽ بدي. شر ۽ خير سڀ انساني سڀاءَ ۾ شامل آهن. تعليم ۽ تربيت سان ئي انهيءَ جي فرق ۽ تميز کي نمايان ڪري سگهجي ٿو ، بدي ۽ شر جو رخ موڙي سگهجي ٿو، ليڪن انهن کي ختم ڪري نه ٿو سگهجي. جيئن ويڙهاند ۽ جهڳڙلو طبيعت کي ظلم، ڏاڍ ۽ ڏمر خلاف ”جهاد“ ۾ بدلايو ويو ۽ دنيا ۾ مذهبن خواهه ٻين نظرين بدي ۽ شر وارن اوڳڻن لاءِ ڀلائيءَ وارا نعم البدل مهيا ڪيا.

    انسان کي انسان جي حيثيت ۾ ئي قبول ڪرڻ ۾ ڀلائي آهي. هن کي ”فرشتي“ يا ”شيطان“ جي روپ ۾ قبول ڪرڻ پنهنجي تباهي آڻڻ جي برابر آهي، اهڙين حالتن ۾ ”محبت“ ۽ ”خدمت“ جي جاءِ تي ”توهم پرستي“ ۽ ”نفرت“ جو راڄ هلندو آهي . ان ڪري عافيت ان ۾ ئي آهي ته انسان کي انسان ئي ڄاتو وڃي پر پنهنجي سر ڪوئي انسان پنهنجي آپي مان نڪري پاڻ کي ”فرشتو يا ”شيطان “ ثابت ڪري ته پوءِ ان جي انهيءَ حيثيت مڃڻ کان انڪار ڪجي، پر پيار يا تڪرار سان کيس انهيءَ جاءِ تي آڻي بيهارجي ، جيڪا هڪ انسان جي جاءِ يا حيثيت ٿيندي آهي. ڇو ته هيءَ اسان جي دنيا انسانن جي جاءِ آهي. هن ۾ فقط انسان ئي رهي سگهن ٿا، جيڪي ”خطائن“ جا پتلا به هوندا آهن ته نيڪين ۽ چڱاين جا ”آدرش“ به ٿيندا آهن. پر هو نه ته ”فرشتا“ ٿيندا آهن ۽ نه وري ”شيطان“ ٿيندا آهن. انسان فقط انسان ئي ٿيندا آهن.

    (روزنامه ”هلال پاڪستان“ ڪراچي ، تاريخ : 17.02.1988)

     

     

  • 57. ڪامن فيڪٽرس جي تلاش

    ڪامن فيڪٽرس جي تلاش

     

    وڏيون شخصيتون پنهنجي پنهنجي وجود ۾ مڪمل انجمن ڄاتيون وينديون آهن . انهيءَ ۾ ڪو به شڪ ڪونهي . ڇو ته دور جا عظيم انسان پنهنجي وسيع تر مطالعي ، مشاهدي ، تجربي ۽ احساس جي خزاني کان سواءِ سوچ ۽ لوچ جي سوغات جا ڌڻي به ٿيندا آهن . سندن اندروني ڪائنات خيالي ۽ تصوراتي ڪو نه ٿيندي آهي . هو پنهنجا نظريا ، قدر ۽ اصول پڻ شوق مطابق ڦيرائيندا ۽ بدلائيندا ڪو نه آهن . اول ته اهي اکيون ٻوٽي ڪنهن کي ڪو نه مڃيندا آهن . پر جيڪڏهن ڪنهن کي مڃيندا آهن ته دنيا جي ڪا به طاقت کين انهيءَ کان منهن مٽڻ تي مجبور ڪري نه سگهندي آهي . اهڙن انسان کي ئي پنهنجي دور جو ”وڏو انسان“ چيو ويندو آهي .

    پاڻ جنهن دؤر مان گذري رهيا آهيون . لڳي ٿو ته اسان جي دؤر جو هر ڪو ماڻهو به ڄڻ ڪامل ، مڪمل ۽ عظيم انسان آهي . هر ڪو پنهنجي وجود ۾ ڄڻ مڪمل انجمن آهي . اهوئي سبب آهي جو هر ڪو ڏيڍ چانور جي ديڳ الڳ چاڙهيو ويٺو آهي . ان ڪري ادبي جماعتون ڏسو ته ڳڻيون نه ڳڻبيون . سياسي پارٽِون ڳڻبيون ته ائين لڳندو ڄڻ سنڌ ۾ سياسي پارٽيون ٺاهڻ جون ڪي فيڪٽريون هجن . ثقافت جي ٺيڪيداري هر ڪنهن کي ورثي ۾ ملي آهي . دنيا جهان جو ڏک سمورن جا سينا ساڙهي رهيو آهي . ڪن دوستن کي دنيا جهان يا قوم جو ڏک سٺو نه ٿو لڳي ته ذات پات رنگ نسل جي بنياد تي پارٽي ٺاهي پٽڪو ضرور ٻڌندا . مطلب ته هر ڪو ٻه ٽي ٿان بغل ۾ دٻايو پيو گهمندو ، جڏهن به جٿي ٿو موقعو ملين ته ڪنهن جي ڪاڻ ڪڍڻ کان سواءِ ٿان ڦاڙي پنهنجو پاڻ کي پٽڪي ٻڌرائڻ ۾ ويرم نٿو لائي .

    بيشڪ هن دؤر ۾ به ڀلن ، سٺن ۽ بيلوث انسانن جي ڪمي ڪانهي . ائين ڪونهي ته ڪو هي دؤر به ”عظيم انسان“ کان خالي هوندو . پر اڄوڪن عظيم انسانن ۽ ڪلهه جي عظيم انسانن ۾ زمين آسمان جيڏو فرق آهي . ڪلهه جي عظيم انسانن پنهنجي دؤر جي تقاضائن مطابق ”داخلي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ تي توجهه ڏنو هو ۽ اڄ جو پاڻ هرتو عظيم انسان ”خارجي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ کي به پنهنجو نٿو ڪري . هن جو جيڪڏهن زور ۽ توجهه آهي ته پاڻ وڻائڻ ۽ پنهنجي شخصيت مڙهائڻ تي آهي . پوءِ نه ڇو ان لاءِ پنهنجي يا پرائي حيثيت يا شخصيت کي به خاڪ ۾ ملائڻو پوي .

    ڳالهه نڪتي آهي ”ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ جي، جن کي مٿي ٻن قسمن ۾ ورهايو ويو آهي . يعنيٰ هڪڙا آهن ”داخلي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ ۽ ٻيا آهن ”خارجي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“. انهن جي به جيڪڏهن وضاحت ڪبي هڪجي ته بيجا نه ٿيندو .

    ”داخلي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ رنگ ، نسل ، ذات پات ۽ دين ڌرم جا تابغ نه ٿيندا آهن . بلڪ دنيا جا مڙوئي دين ڌرم انهن جي ئي تبليغ ڪندا آهن ۽ هر ڪنهن دين پنهنجي پنهنجي نظرئي ۽ طريقي جي وسعت سان انهن جي تشريح ڪئي آهي ، اهي آهن سچ ، حق ۽ سونهن. هر ڪو نظريو ”سچ“ جي منهن مٿي ڪرڻ جي ڳالهه ڪري ٿو . هر ڪو مڪتبه فڪر ”حق پرتسيءَ“ جي دعويٰ ڪري ٿو ۽ هر ڪو فلسفو معاشري ۽ ڪائنات جي ”سونهن“ کي نروار ڪرڻ جو ذڪر ڪري ٿو . البت ڪي ڪي نظريا ، دين ۽ انسان ذات جي عظمت جي ڳالهه ڪن ٿا .

    ماضي جي عظيم انسانن انهن ئي ”ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ کي پنهنجو ڪيو . انهن کي پنهنجي قول فعل، شخصيت ۽ ڪردار سان نروار ڪيو .

    ”داخلي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ يا اخلاقيات تي ٻڌل هن سوچ ۽ لوچ جي پڄاڻي ان وقت ٿي ، جڏهن ڌرتيءَ تي ڌارين جو راڄ شروع ٿيو . هي ڌاريا رنگ نسل ، زبان ، ذات ۽ پات کان وٺي اخلاقي ۽ ثقافتي قدرن ۾ بنهه اوپرا ، نرالا ۽ ڌاريا هئا . سندن ڪوشش سان ۽ سندن اثر هيٺ پنهنجي ڌرتي جو ”اخلاقي“ ۽ ”ثقافتي“ نظام بري طرح متاثر ٿيو . انهن ڌارين مثبت نظرين ، اصولن ، عقيدن ۽ ڌرمن کي پنهنجي منفي مقصدن ، ذاتي مفادن ، اقتصادي استحصال ۽ سياسي غلامي کي برقرار رکڻ لاءِ ڪم آندو . نتيجي ۾ ”داخلي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ جي جاءِ تي ”خارجي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ کي حيثيت ملي . جن ماڻهن انهن ۾ فنا پاتي سي ئي انهيءَ دؤر جي عظيم انسانن ۾ شمار ڪيا ويا .

    هاڻي سوال ٿو پيدا ٿئي ته ”خارجي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ ڪهڙا آهن . ان جو جيڪڏهن مختصر جواب ڏيون ته فقط ايترو چوڻ ڪافي نه ٿيندو ته ڌرتي“ ، ”ٻولي“ ، ”ثقافت“ ۽ ”تاريخ“ ئي خارجي ڪامن فيڪٽرس آهن . جيئن هن کان اڳ ”داخلي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ ڪري ڪنهن شخصيت کي ڄاتو سڃاتو ويندو آهي .”خارجي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ وري ڪنهن قوم جي ڄاڻ سڃاڻ ٿين ٿا .

    قوم جا هڏ ڏوکي ڏاها انسان انهن حالتن ۾ حيران ۽ پريشان ٿي پوندا آهن ، جڏهن کين اهو احساس ٿيندو آهي ته سندن قوم جي اڪثريت ”داخلي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ کي ته صديون اڳ وڃائي ۽ ويساري چڪي آهي،پر هاڻي ”خارجي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ نه قوم کان خاص کسبا ۽ وڃائبا وڃن ٿا.

    منهنجي خيال ۾ اسان پڻ اهڙي حالتن جي انگاس تي لٽڪيا پيا آهيون . تاريخ يعنيٰ ”ماضي“ کي پنهنجي ”اجتماعي حافظي“طور مڃڻ بدران ان کي رجعت پسندي جي نشاني سمجهي ڇڏي ڏنو آهي . ”ڌرتي“ ، يعنيٰ زمين لاءِ ”سکر بيراج“ جي تعمير کان وٺي ويندي اڄوڪي دؤر تائين هاري ، زميندار ، ڌن ڌڻي ۽ سياستدان دانهون ڪوڪون ڪندا پيا اچن ته زراعت لائق زمينون سندن هٿن مان نڪرنديون پيون وڃن .

    ”ٻوليءَ“ جو ٻين تي حشر ڪيو ئي آهي . پر اسان سنڌي ميڊيم اسڪولن کولڻ جا مطالبا ڪندي به ڪنهن نه ڪنهن ڌاري زبان کي پنهنجو ميڊيم بڻايون ٿا . سنڌ ڪڏهن به لساني تنگ دليءَ جو مظاهرو نه ڪيو آهي . بلڪ هر هڪ دؤر ۾ لساني رواداري جو مظاهر جڏهن به سندن ٻوليءَ جي جهوليءَ ۾ ڪنڊاوڌا ويا ، تڏهن انهن ڪنڊن کي گلن ۽ ٽانڊن کي بهار ۾ بدلائڻ جي ڪوشش ڪئي . اهو ئي سبب آهي جو جڏهن چيو ويندو هو ، ”ته سنڌي وائي ڪم نه آئي“ يا ”پارسي ٻولي گهوڙي چاڙهسي“ ته انهن ۽ اهڙين حالتن ۾ شاهه ڪريم ۽ شاهه لطيف جهڙا عظيم شاعر پيدا ٿيا . جن سون تي سيڻ مٽائڻ کي ناپسند ڪيو ۽ انهن فقط ۽ فقط پنهنجي مادري زبان ۾ لکيو . ليڪن اڄ جو اديب چند ڏوڪڙن جي آسري تي پنهنجي مادري زبان تان به هٿ کڻڻ لاءِ تيار نظر اچي ٿو .

    ”خارجي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ مان ”ڌرتي“ ، ”تاريخ“ ۽ ” ٻولي“ جهڙا اهم فيڪٽرس ائين پنهنجي اهميت ۽ حيثيت وڃائي ويٺا آهن، پر گهٽ حشر ”ثقافت“ جو به ڪونه ٿيو آهي . اسان پنهنجي رهڻي ڪهڻي ، اٿئي ويهڻ ، کاڌي پيتي ، رسم ۽ رواج ۾ به ڄڻ سنڌي رهيا ئي ڪو نه آهيون .

    انهن ڳالهين کي ڳڻيندي انهيءَ نتيجي تي پهچجي ٿو ته اسان پنهنجا داخلي ۽ خارجي سمورا ڪامن فيڪٽرس وڃائي ويٺا آهيون . اهي بزرگ نظر نه ٿا اچن جيڪي ”اخلاقيات“ جي هن نظام کي نئين سر رائج ڪن . ڪنهن کي دين ڌرم ۽ اخلاقي ڳالهه چوڻ جي به همٿ ڪا نه ٿي ٿئي . ڇو ته هن ويچاري کي ”رجعت پسندي“ جا خطاب ته ملن ئي ملن ٿا پر اوڳڻ جا اوتار سندن جاني دشمن بڻجي پون ٿا . برائيءَ جا بند ٻڌڻ واري کي ايترو ته بدنام ڪيو و ڃي ٿو ، جو کيس ڪو ئي ٻڌڻ لاءِ تيار نه ٿو ٿئي . ايمانداري هنن لاءِ کوٽا سڪا آهن . خير خواهي جي وٽن ڪا به گنجائش ڪانهي . حلال ڪري کائڻ سندن لاءِ حرام ٿي پيو آهي . جتي اڪثريت ئي اهڙن ماڻهن جي هجي اتي بزرگ جي ڪهڙي دال ڳرندي ؟ پر هي همراهه به لوهه جا چڻا چاڙهيون ويٺا آهن . نيٺ ته اهي ڳرندا .

    جتي ”داخلي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ کي فروغ ڏيڻ دل گردي جو ڪم ٿي پيو آهي . اتي ”خارجي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ کي رائج ڪرڻ گدو بندر واري اسپتال ۾ داخل ٿيڻ برابر آهي . شاهه لطيف جي چوڻي مطابق ته : ”جي اتر ڊاهي ان جي ته ڪنهن کي ڪارون ڪن ؟“

    جيڪڏهن اُهي ”ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ جيڪي اسان جي وجود ، حيثيت ۽ تشخص جو سبب آهن . انهن کي اسان پاڻ پنهنجو نه ڪندا سين ته گاڏو ڪيئن گڙندو؟ پوءِ ڇو نه اسان جو اهڙو حشر ٿئي جيڪو ٿي رهيو آهي . منهنجي خيال فرد جي انفرادي تعمير ۽ تڪميل لاءِ ”داخلي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ ۽ قوم جو اجتماعي تعميل ۽ تڪميل لاءِ ”خارجي ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ هر دؤر ۾ هڪ جهڙي حيثيت ۽ اهميت رکن ٿا .

    انهن ٻنهي قسمن جي ”ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ کان نفرت ۽ بي رخيءَ جو وڏي کان وڏو ڪارڻ انهن ”ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ جي تبليغ ۽ تشريح غلط ٽولن جي هٿ ۾ اچڻ آهي، جيڪي پنهنجي گروهي مفادن خاطر اخلاق ، مذهب ، انسان ، ڌرتي ، ٻولي ، تاريخ ۽ ثقافت جو غلط استعمال ڪن ٿا . جڏهن مذهب ۽ اخلاق جي ڳالهه ڪندڙ ۾ مذهب ۽ اخلاق جي ڪا بوءِ ئي نه هجي . جڏهن ڌرتيءَ سان دوستيءَ جي ڳالهه ڪندڙ غداريءَ کي روزگار بڻائي . جڏهن ٻوليءَ جي ترقيءَ لاءِ ٻاڪاريندڙ انسان ڌارين ٻولين جي جهوليءَ ۾ گل وجهي . جڏهن تاريخ جا ورق ورائيندڙ هر هڪ صفحي تي فقط ۽ فقط پنهنجي ذات پات ، رنگ نسل ۽ دين ڌرم کي ڏسي سگهي ، جڏهن ثقافت جي تحفظ ۽ ترقيءَ جي اوني ۾ اکيون آليون ڪندڙ انسان پنهنجي ئي رهڻي ڪهڻي ۽ اٿڻي ويهڻيءَ کان ڪرڀ ڪري ته پوءِ باقي ڪهڙا ”ڪامن فيڪٽرس“ بچن ٿا ، جن سان اسان سڃاڻجي سگهون ٿا ۽ جيڪي اسان جي سوچ ۽ لوچ تي پنهنجي ڇاپ هڻي سگهن ٿا .

     

    (ڪالم؛ فالو آن هلال پاڪستان تاريخ 02-03-1991)

     

     

  • 56. فرض ادا ٿي ويو

    فرض ادا ٿي ويو!

     

    ويچاري بدنصيب قوم کي بيدار ڪرڻ جي ڪوشش ته هر ڪو ڪري ٿو ، ليڪن لڳي ٿو ته اسان جي اڳواڻن ، عقيدتمندن ۽ هڏ ڏوکين کي هوشيار ۽ خبر دار ڪرڻ وارو آهي ئي ڪو نه ! حقيقت ۾ اُهي انسان جيڪي پاڻ کي ڌرتيءَ ۽ ڌرتيءَ وارن جا خير خواهه ، خادم ۽ رهبر ڄاڻن ٿا ، جيڪڏهن جاڳي پون ته سٻاجهي سنڌ سڀاڳي ٿي پوي .

    مقصدن جي برابري هئڻ باوجود هر هڪ شعبي سان واسطو رکندڙ ماڻهو پورهئي جي ورڇ پٽاندڙ هڪ ٻئي کان الڳ ٿين ٿا . جيڪو ڪم سياست جي شعبي کي ڪرڻو آهي ، اهو ڪم علم ادب سر انجام ڏئي نه ٿو سگهي . اهڙيءَ ريت استاد وڪالت ڪري نه ٿو سگهي ۽ وڪيل ڪنهن مريض جي دوا ڪري نه ٿو سگهي . هي ڪم سياسي شعبي جو آهي ته اهو حقيقتن ،حالتن ۽ واقعن تي نظر رکندو هلي ته جيئن ڌرتي ۽ ڌرتي وارن جي جوڳي حفاظت ڪري سگهجي. ڪيڏي نه ڏک جي ڳالهه آهي ته سنڌ ۾ سياسي پارٽيون ته مٿي ۾ وارن جيتريون آهن ، پر ڪنهن به پارٽيءَ جي تنظيمي ڍانچي ۾ ”ريسرچ سيل“ ۽ ”برين پول“ جي گنجائش ڪانهي . بلڪ ڪيترين پارٽين جي جوڙ جڪ ته بنهه غير سائنسي بنيادن تي ٻڌل ٿئي ٿي . جڏهن اسان جي ڪن پارٽين جي اڳواڻن کي اها به خبر ڪانهي ته هڪ تنيظيم جا ڪيترا ۽ ڪهڙا شعبا هئڻ گهرجن ۽ اهي ڪيئن ۽ ڪهڙي ريت پنهنجو ڪم سرانجام ڏيندا رهن ، ته اهڙين حالتن ۾ ڪهڙي ٿي اميد ڪري سگهجي ته ڪو ”ريسرچ سيل“ به هجي ، ڪو ”برين پول“ به قائم ڪجي ، ۽ هڪ اڌ ”وجيلنيس ڪاميٽي“ به هئڻ گهرجي . نتيجو اهو نڪري ٿو ته ڪن خاص ڳالهين ، واقعن ۽ حالتن جو وقتائتو جائزو وٺي نه ٿو سگهجي ۽ نه وري ان مطابق ڪا ”عام راءِ “ هموار ڪري سگهجي ٿي ، تان جو جڏهن ڪا مصيبت مٿان اچي بيهي ٿي ته پاڻ کي روئڻ ۽ مٿي پٽڻ جو به موقعو ڪو نه ٿو ملي .

    مثال طور اها خبر وڏي ڌام ڌوم سان ٽي وي وغيره تان نشر ٿي ته خانگي شعبي ۾ ڄامشوري وٽ پاور هائوس قائم ڪرڻ لاءِ ٻن ڪئمپن سان ڳالهه ٻولهه وڌائي وئي آهي . ڪنهن به هن اهم خبر جو نه ته نوٽس ورتو ۽ نه وري تجزيو ڪيو . ڪنهن به دانهن ۽ ڪوڪ نه ڪئي ته جيڪڏهن ڄامشورو ۾ پارو هائوس قائم ٿيو ته ان جو هتان جي مقامي آبادي جي تعداد ، سماجي حالتن، سندن لاءِ روزگار جي موقعن ۽ خود ماليات تي ڪيترو اثر پوندو ؟ اڳ جڏهن هن ئي آباديءَ جي ڀر پاسي ۾ ”خدا جي بستي“ قائم ڪئي وئي آهي ته هتي اڳ ۾ رهندڙ خدا جي بندن جو ڪهڙو حشر ڪيو آهي . ٿورو پر ڀرو نوري آباد قائم ڪرڻ سان خود نوي ۽ ڄام تماچيءَ جا روح ڪيترو خوش ٿيا هوندا؟ اهو اسان جو نه پر اڳواڻن جو ڪم آهي ته هر قسم جي اهڙي ڳالهه جي پس منظر ۽ پيش منظر کي عوام جي اڳيان آڻين .

    اهڙيون خبرون روز به روز ٻڌڻ لاءِ ملن ٿيون . ليڪن اسان جي چڱن ڀلن اڪابرن جي مٿن کان گذري وڃن ٿيون. ساڳئي ريت مختلف اخبارن ۾ وقت به وقت نهايت ڇرڪائيندڙ ۽ لونءَ ڪانڊاريندڙ مواد پڻ شايع ٿيندو رهي ٿو . پر ڪو به انهن جو نوٽس نه ٿو وٺي ۽ هر ڪنهن جي ڄڻ جونئن به ننڊ پئي آهي . مثال طور جنوري 1991ع ۾ هڪ معاصر انگريزي اخبار ۾ محترم ايم . واءِ اورڪزئي جو خط شايع ٿيو . جنهن ۾ هن صلاح ڏني ته پاڪستان جيڪو هن وقت چئن صوبن تي مشمتل آهي ، تنهن کي ڏهن صوبن ۾ ورهايو وڃي ، محترم اورڪزئي جيڪو هتي آءِ . جي پوليس رهي چڪو آهي ، سو پهريون شخص ڪونهي ، جنهن ورهاست جي ڳالهه ڪئي آهي . کانئس اڳ ڪيترا مهربان ۽ قدر دان قينچيون کڻي سنڌ يا ٻين نقشن کي ڪتري چڪا آهن . انهن مان مير نبي بخش زهري ، مرزا جاويد بيگ ، رشيد احمد قدوائي ، ۽ جميل نشتر جا نالا ذڪر لائق آهن . انهيءَ خيال کي سرڪاري سطح تي هوا ۽ هٿي ڏيڻ لاءِ سابق مارشل لا جي دؤر ۾ انصاري جي قيادت ۾ جيڪا آئيني ڪميشن ويهاري وئي ، تنهن وري پاڪستان کي ڊزن کن صوبن ۾ ورهائڻ جي ڳالهه ڪئي هئي .

    محترم اورڪزئي جي انهن خطن کان پوءِ ڪراچيءَ مان ڊاڪٽر محمد عذير جو ساڳئي اخبار ۾ خط شايع ٿيو ، جنهن وري اورڪزئي جي انهيءَ راءِ کي ٽيڪو ڏيندي صلاح ڏني آهي ته هڪ سؤ پنجويهه ڪلوميٽر جي مفاصلي تي صوبو ٺاهيو وڃ . سندن انهيءَ گوهر افشاني کان پوءِ ”فرينڊس آف سنڌ فورم“ جي اڳواڻ ڪراچي واسي ايس ايس جعفريءَ جو ساڳئي موضوع تي خط شايع ٿيو ، جنهن جو لب لباب ته ساڳيو آهي ، البت سندس اندازِ بيان انوکو آهي . هي صاحب فرمائي ٿو ته ” جا ڳالهه مون کي سمجهه ۾ نه ٿي اچي ته سا اها آهي ته اهي ماڻهو جيڪي بين الاقوامي معاملن جي ڄاڻ رکن ٿا ،سي ٻين ملڪن جي تجربن مان سبق ڇو نه ٿا پرائڻ . نائجريريا کي اڻويهن صوبن ٺاهڻ کان اڳ گهرو لڙائيءَ مان گذرڻو پيو ………..“ فاضل خط نويس جي تحرير مان جيڪا خوشبوءِ محسوس ڪري سگهجي ٿي ، اها بنهه ظاهر ، نمايان ۽ پڌري آهي .

    ساڳيو ئي مهربان ساڳئي ئي موضوع تي هن کان اڳ 1985ع ۾ به قلم کڻي چڪو آهي ۽ اڄ به انهيءَ راءِ تي اورچ نظر اچي ٿو . هن وقت هو اڪيلو نه آهي بلڪ پنهنجي هم خيال ساٿين جي صف ۾ شامل آهي . سالن جي انهيءَ سوچ جو سنڌ واسين ڪهڙو نوٽيس ورتو آهي؟ علمي ۽ قلمي ميدان ۾ ڪنهن به پنهنجي هنن قدردانن سان ٻولا چاري ڪئي آهي ؟ ڪنهن عوام کي ٻڌايو آهي ته سندن ڌرتيءَ لاءِ اهڙيون به ڳالهيون ڪيون وڃن ٿيون .”جيڪڏهن سياستدان سانت ڪيون ويٺا آهن ته اسان جي صحافت ته اهو فرض ادا ڪري سگهي ٿي . ڇا ڪنهن به اخبار ۾ ڪو اهڙو هفتيوار ڪالم شروع ٿي نه ٿو سگهي ، جنهن ۾ پڙهندڙن کي اهڙي قسم جا بيان ، خط ۽ خبرون جيئن جو تيئن ڪنهن تبصري کان سواءِ ئي پڙهڻ لاءِ مهيا ڪيا وڃن ته جيئن اسان کي خبر پئي ته اسان لاءِ ٻيا ڪهڙي خير خواهي ڪندا رهن ٿا .

    اهي خط ته رهيا پنهنجي ماڳ پر اخبارن جي پهرين صفحن تي وڏين سرخين ۾ انتهائي اهم خبرون شايع ٿين ٿيون . جن کي جهور کان جهور پوڙهو به ڪنهن عينڪ کان سواءِ پڙهي سگهي ٿو . پر نوٽس وٺڻ وارو وري به پاڻ کي ڪو نه ٿو ملي . مثال طور هڪ معاصر انگريزي اخبار جي پهرين صفحي تي شه سرخيءَ جي خبر لڳي آهي ته ”مردم شماريءَ جا اکر سنڌ ۾ سياسي طوفان آڻي سگهن ٿا .“ اسلام آباد جي نمائندي پنهنجي ڪهاڻي هنن لفظن سان شروع ڪئي آهي ته هڪ وڏو سياسي طوفان سنڌ صوبي جو منتظر آهي ، ڇو ته مردم شماري ڪندڙ سرڪاري اهلڪارن جيڪي انگ اکر گڏ ڪيا آهن ، اهي شهري ۽ ٻهراڙي واري آدمشماري اڳوڻي صورتحال (توازن) ۾ وڏي تبديلي ثابت ڪن ٿا . جيڪا ڳالهه نه ته ايم ڪيو ايم ۽ نه وري سموري ملڪ لاءِ قبول ڪرڻ لائق آهي .“

    هڪ ڏينهن اها خبر شايع ٿي ۽ ٻئي ڏينهن تي انهيءَ اخبار ۾ ساڳئي موضوع تي اداريو لکيو ويو . جنهن ۾ جهڙوڪ هڪ ئي وقت تي سنڌ اندر انهيءَ ڪم ۾ مصروف عملدارن ۽ اهڪارن جي ايمانداري ، طريقه ڪار ۽ محنت ۽ ٻئي طرف سنڌ واسين جي رواداري خواهه سرڪاري ڪمن ۾ سهڪار واري جذبي کي نظر انداز ڪندي ، ساڳئي ريت گهر شماريءَ جي ابتدائي نتيجن کي ناقابل قبول ۽ ڪوڙو قرار ڏنو ويو ، نه صرف ايترو بلڪ اها صلاح ڏني وئي ته سنڌ ۾ آدمشماريءَ جي ڪم کي اڌ ۾ روڪيو وڃي .

    جيستائين آدمشماريءَ جو ڪم روڪيو نه ويو ، ان وقت تائين اسان صبر ، تحمل، ۽ بردباريءَ جا نت نوان مثال قائم ڪندا رهيا سين . فيصلي ٿي وڃڻ کان پوءِ ڪن اخبارن اداريا لکيا ، ڪن اڳواڻن بيان ڏنا ۽ اهڙي ريت خير خوبيءَ سان اسان پنهنجي قومي خدمت جو فرض ادا ڪري ڇڏيو !

    زنده آباد قوم جا مدبرو !! شاد آباد قوم جا دانشورو !!!

    (ڪالم؛ فالو آن هلال پاڪستان تاريخ 20-04-1919)

     

     

  • 55. جيڪس هيس ڌاري

    جيڪس هيس ڌاري……..

     

    ڪتابن جا ورق ورائي ڏسبا ، اخبارن جا صفحا اٿلائي ڏسبا ۽ ٽي وي يا ريڊيو جو سئچ آن ڪري ٻڌبو ته جتان ڪٿان اهي دانهون ۽ ڪوڪون ٻڌڻ ۾ اينديون ته هر ڪنهن کي ويچاري قوم جو ڏک آهي ، سڀني جو هنيانءُ ٿو پيو ڦاٽي ، جيڪڏهن اهو حشر ۽ حال ٻه اڍائي سال اڃا رهيو ته قوم جي هڏ ڏوکين جو ماس ته ڇا پر هڏا به ڳري ويندا .

    قلم ڌڻين وٺي قلمي ڪات ڪهاڙا کنيا آهن ته ستل قوم کي هر صورت ۾ اٿاريو ۽ جاڳايو وڃي . اخبارن جا سينا ”هوشيار ، خبر دار“ جي قلمي آوازن ڦاڙي وڌا آهن . اخبارن کي اڳيان رکي ڏسبو ته اسان جي ليکڪن گهڻي کان گهڻو جنهن موضوع تي لکيو آهي ، اهو موضوع آهي ”قوم جي بيداري“ پر ڪو ويچارن ليکڪن کان اهو به پڇي ته ڀائرو اوهان جنهن مجبور ، مفلس ، مظلوم قومن لاءِ جاڳرتا جي باهه ٻاري ڏني آهي ، اها ستي ڪٿي آهي ؟ ان کي آرام ڪڏهن نصيب ٿيو آهي اوهان ڇو اچي هن جي پٺيان پيا آهيو ، گهٽ ۾ گهٽ اوهان ته کيس ٿورو آرام ڪرڻ ڏيو . کيس آرام جي ضرورت آهي . ڇڏيوس ته اها پنهنجي ذهن ۽ دماغ کي تازو ڪري وٺي .

    آئون پنهنجي اديبن ۽ ليکڪن جي انهيءَ ڳالهه تي اتفاق ڪو نه ڪندس ته ڪو اسان جي قوم غفلت جي ننڊ ۾ آهي . ان جي برعڪس ان جو آرام ئي ڦٽل آهي . جيڪڏهن ڪنهن کي اعتباري نه اچي ته هو پنهنجي دل تي هٿ رکي پاڻ کان پڇي ته ڪيترا سال ٿيا آهن جو هن قرار سان ننڊ نه ڪئي آهي ؟ هن جون راتيون ڪيئن گذرن ٿيون ؟ ۽ هن جا ڏينهن ڪيئن گذرن ٿا ؟ جڏهن اسان مان به اهو ڪو نه ٿو مڃي ته هن کي آرام جي ننڊ نصيب آهي ته پوءِ قوم ڪيئن ستل چئبي ؟ ها قوم ستل ڪا نه آهي ، بلڪ اسان جي قوم ڇٻر مثال آهي ، جيئن جيئن ڇٻر کي گهوڙو ۽ گڏهه به کائي ، ڍور ۽ ڍڳو به کائي پر پوءِ به اها پاڻ – هرتو ڦٽي پئي ۽ کُٽي ئي ڪو نه . اسان جي قوم کي ڪنهن ڪنهن نه کاڌو ، لٽيو ۽ ڦريو آهي ؟ عملدارن رعيت آزارن سان ملي ڏسو ته جهڙوڪ مڏي ڪاتي وهائڻ کان به ڪين ٿا مڙن . ڪنهن ”چڱي مڙس“ ڏي وڃو ، پٽڪو ٻڌي ته مٿي سان وڃبو پر موٽ تي اهو چيلهه سان ٻڌل هوندو ، ڪنهن اقتدار واري ڳواڻ ڏي پنڌ ڪبو ته وعدن ۽ دلاسن جي بار سان ڪنڌ ئي ڀڄي پوندو ، بي اختيار بادشاهن سان ملبو ته ”نيٺ ته صبح ٿيندو “ جي نيرن ڪرائي تڪڙو زوانو ڪري ڇڏيندو . قوم جي ڪنهن به فرد کي ڪٿي به سهارو ملي ، سا ڳالهه اسان وٽ ٿيڻي ئي ڪانهي .

    پر ، جيڪا ويڌن هر ڪو قوم سان ڪري ٿو ، اها ڏسي پٿر دل انسان به روئي پئي . آئون جڏهن اليڪشن کان اڳ ۽ پوءِ واري عرصي جي انهن بيانن کي اڳيان رکي پڙهڻ ويٺو آهيان ته ڇرڪ نڪتا ٿا وڃن . هن ڌرتي ۽ هي قوم جيڪڏهن واقعي اسان جي اڳواڻن ، رهبرن ۽ مدبرن جي هجي ها ته هوند ان جي ايتري توهين نه ڪئي وڃي ها ، ڪن قدردانن اهو چيو ته هن دفعي قوم سوچ کان ڪم نه ورتو ته کيس پڇتائڻو پوندو ، ڪن اهو فرمايو آهي ته قوم پنهنجي غلطيءَ جو ازالو ڪيو آهي ، ڪي وري اڃا تائين اهو فرمائي رهيا آهن ته هي قوم سڌرڻي ئي ڪانهي .

    اڙي بابا ! هي ويچاري قوم ڪنهن ڏانهن قرآن شريف کڻي ڪو نه وئي آهي ته اوهان ان جا اڳواڻ ٿيو ، رهبر ٿيو ۽ اقتدار يا ايوان ۾ ويهي ، هن جي خدمت ڪيو . خدمت فقط سياست ، محلن ، ماڙِن ۽ بنگلن ذريعي ڪا نه ٿيندي آهي . جيڪڏهن قوم جي ڪو خدمت ڪري ٿو ته اهو هاري ڪري ٿو ، جيڪو اونداهي رات ۾ لنڊيون لتاڙي گرمي ، سردي ۾ ڌرتي مان انَ اپائي ٿو ، جيڪڏهن قوم جي ڪو خدمت ڪري ٿو ته اهو اديب ، شاعر ، ۽ صحافي ڪري ٿو ، جيڪو پنهنجيون ننڊون ڦٽائي قوم لاءِ لکي ٿو ۽ پنهنجي ٻچڙن جي وات جو گرهه کسي پنهنجي ئي پئسن مان پنهنجيون لکڻيون شايع ڪرائي ٿو ، جيڪڏهن قوم جي ڪو خدمت ڪري ٿو ته اهو معصوم ۽ مظلوم شاگرد ڪري ٿو ، جنهن کي جوڀن ۽ جوانيءَ تي پهچڻ کان اڳ ڪا نه ڪا ڌر سندس انسان دوستي يا وطن دوستي جي جذبن جو استحصال ڪري کيس قربانيءَ جو ٻڪرو بڻائي ٿي ، جيڪڏه قوم جي ڪو خدمت ڪر ي ٿو ته اهو چونڪ تي بيٺل بوٽ پالش ڪندڙ ٻالڪ ڪري ٿو ، جنهن پنهنجي عمل سان ”محنت جي عظمت“ کي پئي ثابت ڪيو آهي . باقي اقتدار ۾ رهي ڪري به قوم کي معاف نه ڪرڻ ۽ اقتدار کان ٻاهر رهي به قوم جي لاک لاهڻ نه خدمت آهي ، نه محنت آهي ۽ نه وري عظمت ئي آهي .

    چيو ويندو آهي ته ”جنهن جو کائجي ، تنهنجو ڳائجي .“ اسان جنهن جو کائون ٿا تنهنجو جي ڳائي نه ٿا سگهون يا ان کي ڪجه ڏئي نه ٿا سگهون ته ڏکوئيون ته نه . ڪيڏي نه ڏک جي ڳالهه آهي جو لطيف سائين فرمائي ته ”جيها جي تيها ، مون مارو مڃيا .“ پر اسان انهن مارن تي ميارن رکڻ کان سواءِ ٻيو ڪو به ڪم نه ٿا ڪريون . اسان ڪا تحريڪ هلايون ته گوليون کائي اها ئي قوم ، جيل ڀري اها ئي قوم ، ۽ رت جي هولين مان گذري ته اها قوم . پوءِ به اها قوم غافل ! پوءِ به اها قوم غلطين جو مجمسو ! پوءِ به اها قوم جاهل ۽ بي سمجهه !!

    ڌڻي تعاليٰ جڏهن آدم کي خلقڻ جو ارادو فرمايو ته ملائڪن هن تخليق جي مخالفت ڪئي ۽ عرض ڪيو ته هي زمين تي فساد ڪندو ۽ رت وهائيندو . ڇا ، اها ڌڻي کي خبر نه هئي ته آدم جو اولاد دنيا ۾ وڃي ڇا ڪندو ؟ بلاشڪ کيس اها خبر هئي ، پر پوءِ به رب ڪريم جو انسان ذات تي اعتماد ته ڏسو جو فرمايائين ته آئون پنهنجو خليفو پيدا ڪري رهيو آهيان . مٽيءَ مان ٺاهيل پنهنجي ان خليفي کي باهه مان جوڙيلن کان سجدا ڪرايائين ! جنهن آدم کي مڃڻ ، سڃاڻڻ ۽ سندس حيثيت کي قبول ڪرڻ کان انڪار ڪيو ، اهو تڙيو ويو . هن دنيا ۾ اهي ئي روايتون باقي آهن ۽ باقي رهنديون ، هڪڙا ماڻهو الله جي روايتن ۽ خواهشن کي مان ڏيندي آدم ۽ آدم جي اولاد کي احترام ڏيندا ، ۽ ٻيا انسان اشرف المخلوقات ۽ الله جي خليفي کي پنهنجي پيرن جي پڻي ڄاڻيندا آهن . اها ڪسوٽي ئي ڪنهن جي عظمت ۽ حيثيت کي مڃائي به ٿي ته مقرر به ڪري ٿي . جڏهن عام انسان ۽ آدم جي اولاد جو به اسان کي ايترو احترام ڪرڻو آهي ته پوءِ پنهنجي قوم سان ته انهيءَ کان وڌيڪ عزت ۽ احترام سان پير کڻڻو پوندو ڇو ته فرد قوم جي ڪري ئي ڄاتو سڃاتو وڃي ٿو ۽ قوم کان سواءِ فرد جو وجود بي معنيٰ هوندو آهي . انسان قوم جي ڇپر ۽ ڇانو ۾ رهي ڏونگر به ڏاري سگهي ٿو ۽ پنهنجو مستقبل به سڌاري سگهي ٿو . هن جي بقا هن جو وجود قوم جي صدقي ٿئي ٿو ، پر ائين لڳي ٿو ته اسان جي قوم جهڙوڪارين جي قوم آهي ان ڪري ساڻس اهو ۽ اهڙو رويو رکيو پيو وڃي .

     

    (ڪالم؛ فالو آن هلال پاڪستان تاريخ 06-04-1991)

     

     

  • 54. ڇاکي وڃي ڇو ٻيلي رهين ٻين جو

    ڇا کي وڃيو ڇو، ٻيلي رهين ٻين جو

     

    دانهن مٿان دانهون ۽ ڪوڪن مٿان ڪوڪون ٿيون پون ته سماج کي بدلايو ، ظلم لڳو پيو آهي . انسان ذات پات جي رنگ ۾ وٺجي ويو آهي ، غربت جي غار جو منهن اڃا بند نه ٿيو آهي ، جهالت روز بروز وڌندي پئي وڃي ، ڏاڍ ۽ ڏمر جا ڏينهن ئي نه ٿا کٽن . پرماريت پنهنجا پر پکيڙي ويٺي آهي ، ڪٿ به امن ۽ سڪون جو نالو نشان نظر نه ٿو اچي ، لافاني قدر ختم ٿيندا پيا وڃن ، غريب جو اوهي واهي ڪونهي ، ڏاڍي لٺ کي ساڳيائي ٻه مٿا آهن ، وغيره وغيره .

    سوال ٿو پيدا ٿئي ته اهي حالتون ڇو نه ٿيون بدلجن ۽ آخر ڪار اهي ڪڏهن بدلبيون ؟ انساني تاريخ اهو ٻڌائي ٿي ته اهڙو ڪو سوال ئي ڪو نه ٿيندو آهي جنهن جو جواب موجود نه هجي . هر سوال جو جواب ٿيندو آهي ته پوءِ هن سوال جو به جواب هئن گهرجي ، جيڪو واقعي آهي به .

    حالتن جي بدلائڻ ۾ ڪنهن کي عمل دخل حاصل آهي ؟ انهيءَ مسئلي تي اسان جي معاشري ۾ اڻ ڳڻيا اختلاف موجود آهن . هڪڙن جو خيال آهي ته حالتن کي انسان بدلائي ٿو ۽ ٻين جو خيال آهي ته حالتون انسان کي بدلائين ٿيون ، ان ڪري انسان حالتن اڳيان بي بس ، مجبور ۽ لاچار آهي . جيڪي چون ٿا ته حالتن کي انسان بدلائي ٿو انهن جو خيال آهي ته جيڪڏهن انسان هٿ ٻڌي حالتن جي تبديليءَ جو انتظار ڪندو ته ان جي معنيٰ اها ٿي ته هو هڪ بي جان شئي آهي ، جنهن پاڻ کي حالتن جي وهندڙ درياهه ۾ جي رحم ڪرم تي ڇڏي ڏنو آهي . دنيا ۾ جيڪي به انقلاب آيا آهن ، انهن پٺيان شعوري ڪوشش موجود هوندي آهي ، انهيءَ قوم جا ڏاها پهريون ذهني ۽ فڪري انقلاب آڻيندا آهن ۽ ان جي نتيجي ۾ پوءِ ٻي تبديلي ايندي آهي .

    جيڪڏهن ڏاهن انسانن جي شعوري ڪوشش ڪا تبديلي آڻڻ جو واحد ذريعو هجي ها ته پوءِ لاکيڻي لطيف جي پيغام جي موجودگيءَ باوجود اسان جو ههڙو حشر ڇو ٿيو آهي جو پيرن هيٺان شهرن جي ڌرتي ڇڏائيندي وڃي ، وات مان زبان سسندي وڃي ٿي ۽ راتين جي ننڊ خواهه ڏينهن جو سڪون تباهه ٿيندو پيو وڃي . هي سڀ ڪجهه ان ڪري ٿي رهيو آهي جو لطيف سائين ته اسان سان سچو رهيو ، ليڪن اسان ساڻس ۽ سندس پيغام سان سچا نه رهيا آهيون . اسان لطيف سائين جو نالو روڊن ، ريلن ، هوٽلن ۽ هاسٽلن ، ڪارخانن ۽ ڪتاب گهرن ، جماعتن ۽ ادارن تي ته رکيو آهي ليڪن سندس پيغام کي سمجهي ان تي عمل نه ڪيو آهي . لطيف سائين اسان جي ثقافتي چر پر ۽ هلچل جو اهڃاڻ ته وڃي رهيو آهي ، ليڪن اسان کانئس قومي ،انقلابي ۽ عالمي شاعر هئڻ واري حيثيت کسي ورتي آهي . اها حيثيت ڪنهن کسي آهي ؟ قوم ؟ نه ، ڪڏهن به نه ، بلڪ اسان پاران سفيد پوش ٻه اکر پڙهيل ڪڙهيل ، پاڻ کي سيبتن ، ڏاهن ، ۽ سياڻن سڏائيندڙ انسانن ! جيڪي قوم جو دک درد رکڻ جي دعويٰ ڪيون ٿا ، جيڪي قوم جي روشن آئيندي جي خوابن ڏسڻ لاءِ پيٽ ڀري کائي سمهون ٿا .

    هن جو اهو مطلب ٿيو ته واقعي ڪا شخصيت ۽ سندس شعوري ڪوشش حالتن جي بدلائڻ جو اڪيلو ذريعو نٿي ٿئي . بلڪ حالتن بدلائڻ ۾ ڪي ٻئي محرڪات ، ڪارڻ ۽ سبب به ٿين ٿا ، پر اها دعويٰ ۽ اها ڳالهه اسان جي معاشري ۾ قبول ڪرڻ جوڳي ناهي . اسان پنهنجي معاشري ۾ اهو تڪڙو مڃائي نه ٿا سگهون ته حالتن بدلائڻ ۾ شخصيت کي ثانوي حيثيت حاصل هوندي آهي . اهو مثال به سمجهائي نه ٿا سگهون ته ماڻهو وڻ مان انب تڏهن ئي پٽي سگهندو ، جڏهن وڻ ۾ انب هوندا ، حالتون تبديل تڏهن ڪري سگهبيون جڏهن حالتون سازگار هونديون . اسان جو معاشرو ”آدرش پرست“ ۽ ”آدرش پسند“ معاشرو آهي ، انهيءَ سوچ اسان جي عوام ۽ ان جي علمي ،ادبي ، ثقافتي ۽ سياسي اڳواڻن جي فطرت کي پڻ متاثر ڪيو آهي . عوام جو خيال آهي ته اديب ۽ شاعر جي قلم کي جنبش ايندي ته آهني ۽ فڪري انقلاب ايندو ۽ جي قومي اڳواڻ زبان کوليندو ته ظلم جا زنجير ٽٽي پوندا . اهڙيءَ ريت اسان جو علمي ، ادبي ۽ سياسي اڳواڻ به پاڻ کي انقلاب آڻيندڙ ڄاڻي ٿو .

    هاڻي جيڪڏهن سنڌ صدين کان وٺي مردم خيز مٽي رهي آهي ۽ هن ڌرتيءَ علم ادب خواهه سياست جي ميدان ۾ املهه ماڻڪ ماڻهو پيدا ڪيا آهن ته پوءِ به ڪا تبديلي ڇو نه آئي آهي ۽ اسان دانهون ۽ ڪوڪون ڇو ٿا ڪريون . يا ته اسان جون دانهون ۽ ڪوڪون اجايو آهن يا وري انهن املهه ماڻڪ ماڻهن ڪو ٻوٽو ڪو نه ٻاريو آهي .

    اسان جي دانهن ۽ ڪوڪن ۾ ته وزن آهي ، البت انهيءَ ڳالهه تي سوچي سگهجي ٿو ته اسان جي علمي ، ادبي، ثقافتي ۽ سياسي آدرشن ڪيتري قدر ٻوٽو ٻاريو آهي . ڪنهن اجائي اينگهه ڪرڻ بدران ٿورن لفظن ۾ ائين چوڻ ڪافي ٿيندو ته ٻوٽي ٻارڻ جو مقصد آهي ته پنهنجي قول ۽ فعل ، شخصيت ۽ ڪردار کي ملائي ، بي لوث بڻجي پنهنجي منزل طرف انتهائي خلوص ۽ پڪي ارادي سان اڳتي وڌڻ ۽ بس . هاڻي انهيءَ ڪسوٽيءَ کي اڳيان رکي اچو ته اسان پنهنجي پنهنجي آدرشن جي ڪارنامن جو جائزو وٺون . ائين ڪرڻ سان پاڻهي اڇا ڪارا پڌرا ٿي پوندا ۽ اهو احساس ٿيڻ لڳندو ته اسان کي پنهنجي آدرش دوستي ، آدرش پرستي ۽ آدرش پسندي واري نظرئي تي نظر ثاني ڪرڻ گهرجي .

    جڏهن اسان اهو چئون ٿا ته حالتون نه بدليون آهن ۽ اسان اهي حالتون بدلائڻ گهرون ٿا ته ان جو هي مطلب پڻ آهي ته اسان هر انهيءَ آدرش کي نه ٿا مڃون ، جنهن جي دعويٰ آهي ته هو حالتن بدلائڻ جي ڪوشش ڪندو آيو آهي . جڏهن اسان موجوده حالتن کي قبول نه ٿا ڪيون ته لاشعوري طور تي پنهنجي آدرشن کي قبول نه ٿا ڪريون ، پر جڏهن شعوري طور تي پنهنجي آدرشن کي قبول ڪرڻ کان انڪار ڪنداسين ته پوءِ جهڙوڪ دنيا جي سمورن انقلابن ۽ تبديلين جي پهرين مڃيل اصول کي پنهنجو ڪري ورتوسين ۽ اهو اصول آهي ”نفي کان اثبات“ طرف وڌڻ .

    هي ڳالهه جيڪڏهن اسلامي تاريخ ۽ دين مان مثال ڏئي ڪجي ته مناسب ٿيندو . اهو ماڻهو ان وقت تائين مسلمان ٿي نه ٿو سگهي ، جيستائين ڪلمو نه ٿو پڙهي . اهو ماڻهو ان وقت تائين الله کي نه ٿو مڃي ، جيستائين سندس مڃتا کان هو اڳ اڻ ڳڻيا الله مڃڻ کان انڪار نه ٿو ڪري . يعني ته پهريون هر شئي ۽ هر الله کان انڪار ڪري ٿو ۽ پوءِ حقيقي الله جو اقرار ڪري ٿو . اهڙي ريت جيستائين اسان اڻ ڳڻين آدرشن جي مڃتا جا منڪر نٿا ٿيون ، ان وقت تائين حقيقي آدرشن جي مڃتا ڪري نه ٿا سگهون . اهو حقيقي آدرش ڪير آهي ۽ ڪٿي آهي ؟ انهنيءَ جو جواب تلاش ڪرڻ کان اڳ ضروري آهي ته هو پنهنجو پاڻ کي آزاد ڪري اهو اعلان ڪري ته جيئن آئون هنن حالتن مان خوش نه آهيان ، تيئن انهن حالتن پيدا ڪندڙ ۽ حالتن بدلائڻ وارن دعويدارن کان به خوش نه آهيان ، ان ڪري نه ته حالتن کي مڃان ٿو ۽ نه وري آدرشن کي مڃان ٿو .

     

    (ڪالم؛ فالو آن هلال پاڪستان تاريخ 30-03-1991)

     

     

  • 53. وڍيل ٿي وايون ڪري

    وڍيل ٿي وايون ڪري………..

     

    ڌرتيءَ ۽ ڌرتي ڌڻين جي ڪن سٻاجهن خيرخواهن جو خيال آهي ته زندگيءَ جي مختلف شعبن ۾ وسيع تر اتحاد ۽ اتفاق ٿيڻ گهرجي . اديبن کي ادب جي دنيا ۾ ويڇا وسارڻ گهرجن ، سياستدانن کي قوم جي مفاد ۾ هڪ ٿيڻ گهرجي . اهڙي خواهش رکندڙ هر ڪو حساس ماڻهو جذبن جي سادگيءَ تي کيرون لهڻي ۽ سندن وات گلاب . پر اهڙي خواهش اسان جي حالتن ۾ انهيءَ سهڻي خواب برابر آهي ، جنهن جو ڪو به تعبير ڪو نه ٿيندو آهي . جيڪڏهن عملي ۽ نظري طور تي اها خواهش ڪو روپ وٺڻ جهڙي هجي ها ته پوءِ ”سنڌ قومي اتحاد“ جو ههڙو حشر نه ٿئي ها ۽ اسان جا ڏاها رڳو ٽيبل ٽاڪ ذريعي پنهنجي لياقتن ۽ صلاحيتن جا جوهر ڏيکارڻ تائين محدود نه رهن ها .

    اسان انهن حالتن مان گذري رهيا آهيون ، جن جي ڪک مان اڻ ڳڻيا تضاد پيدا ٿيندا رهيا آهن . هن موڙ تي تضادن کي نظر انداز ڪري ، اتحاد ۽ اتفاق جي ڳالهه ڪرڻ ائين آهي جيئن مرض جي نشانين کي نظر انداز ڪري مريض کي خوش ڪرڻ لاءِ اکيون ٻوٽي ٽڪين ڦوٽن جو لپ ڀري کارائڻ . ارتقا جي عمل جي تقاضا هيءَ آهي ته انهن تضادن کي ختم ڪرڻ بدران وڌڻ ۽ ويجهڻ ڏجي ته جيئن هو پنهنجي پنهنجي رخ ۾ مڪمل رنگ ۽ روپ وٺي بيهن . اهڙين حالتن ۾ ئي عوام پنهنجي ”حال“ ۽ ”مستقبل“ جي مفاد وٽان ڪن تضادن کي پنهنجو ڪندو ۽ ڪن تضادن کي سهڻو ٽوهه ڄاڻي ڦٽو ڪري ڇڏيندو .

    ڏک جي ڳالهه اها آهي جو اسان کي هر ڪا تعليم اڌوري ۽ اڻ پوري ملندي آهي . پوءِ اها عام تعليم هجي ، عملي تعليم هجي يا نظرياتي تعليم . صدين کان وٺي اسان کي ”محنت“ جي ڳڻن ، ”اتحاد“ جي فائدن ۽ ”زندگي“ جي حقيقتن کان ته باخبر رکيو ويو آهي، ليڪن اها ”تعليم“ ”نفرت“ جي نڙيءَ تي لت ڏئي، ”اختلاف“ جون اکيون ڪڍي ۽ ”موت“ کي مروٽي سروٽي ڏني وئي آهي. اسان کي جهڙوڪ انهن امر جذبن ”نفرت“ ، اختلاف“ ۽ ”موت“ جي افاديت ، اهميت ۽ عظمت کان بي خبر رکيو ويو آهي . حالانڪ ”محبت“ جيان ”نفرت“ به عظيم جذبو آهي . ”اتحاد“ جيان ”اختلاف“ به وڏي وٿ آهي ۽ ”زندگي“ جيان ”موت“ به برابريءَ واري حيثيت رکي ٿو . اسان کي انهن کان اجايو ۽ ائين ڊڄڻ نه گهرجي . کين دل جي گهراين سان پنهنجي پنهنجي حيثيت ڏيڻ گهرجي .

    ائين ڪو نه آهي ته ”اتحاد“ کي اسان اڄ جي حالتن ۾ اکيون ٻوٽي نظر انداز ڪري ڇڏيون يا ڪو”اتحاد“ اسان جي دور ۾ بيڪار ، بي سود ۽ بي معنيٰ عمل آهي . ليڪن مسئلو هي آهي ته ”اتحاد“ زندگيءَ جي ڪهڙن ڪهڙن شعبن ۾ ممڪن ٿي سگهي ٿو ۽ اسان کي پنهنجي ڪهڙن صفن ۾ ”اتحاد“ پيدا ڪرڻ گهرجي ؟

    اديبن جي دنيا ۾ ان ڪري ”اتحاد“ پيدا ٿيڻو ڪونهي جو هيءَ دنيا اڄ ڪيترين نظرياتي ڪئمپن ۾ ورهائجي وئي آهي . ڪن جو خيال آهي ته ”ادب سماجي ڪارج“ رکي ٿو ۽ ڪن جو خيال آهي ته ”ادب اديب يا شاعر جي فني يا فڪري صلاحيتن جو تابع ۽ ترجمان آهي .“ ڪي اديب ”ترقي پسند“ آهن ، ڪي ”وطن دوست“ آهن ۽ ڪي پاڻ کي ”ادب دوست“ سڏائن ٿا . انهن نظرياتي اختلافن سبب سمورن اديبن ۾ ”اتحاد“ پيدا ڪرڻ جو هر ڪو سعيو اجايو ثابت ٿيندو . اهو حشر ۽ حال اسان جي ”سياست“ جي شعبي جو پڻ آهي . سنڌ ۾ اديبن جون ايتريون تنظيمون ۽ جماعتون ڪين آهن جيتريون سياسي پارٽيون .

    ارتقاء جي هن موڙ تي ”اتحاد“ ته رهيو پنهنجي ماڳ ۽ پري جي ڳالهه پر اسان نه به چاهيون ، ان هوندي به تنظيمن ، تحريڪن ۽ نظرياتي ڪئمپن کي اڃا ڀور ڀور ٿيڻو آهي . ڇو ته انهن ۾ ”اجتماعي مفاد“ ، ”جذبي سان سچائي“ ، ”قرباني ۽ ايثار“ ۽ ”مسلسل جدوجهد“ جي جذبن ۽ عملن جي اڻ هوند آهي . تنظيمون تحريڪون ۽ نظرياتي ڪئمپون جڏهن انمول ، اساس ۽ بنياد تان هٽي وڃي ”پاڻ چمڪائڻ“ ، ”ذاتي مفادن حاصل ڪرڻ “ ، ”ٻين جي اشارن تي نچڻ“ ۽ ”پنهنجن ئي ڪارڪنن کي پاڻ جهڙو نه ڄاڻڻ“ جو ذريعو بڻجي وينديون آهن ته انهن جو حشر ٽٽڻ ، ڀرڻ ۽ پاش پاش ٿيڻ هوندو آهي .

    ڪنهن به تنظيم جي ٽٽڻ ۽ ڪنهن تحريڪ جي ڀرڻ جو اندازو لڳائن بنهه آسان ۽ ممڪن هوندو آهي . ان لاءِ ڪي پارسيون پڙهڻيون ڪو نه پونديون آهن . اسان جيڪڏهن پنهنجي ڀرپاسي ، پنهنجي ڌرتي تي يا پنهنجي وجود ۾ جهاتي پائي ڏسنداسين ته ارتقاء جو هي عمل بنهه ظاهر ۽ نمايان ٿي اسان جي اڳيان ايندو .

    اجتماعي مفادن ۽ مقصدن ڏانهن وڌندڙ ڪنهن به تحريڪ يا تنظيم جو منطقي عمل ۽ ان جو نتيجو هيءُ هوندو آهي ته ان ۾ وقت گذرڻ سان گڏ نوان ساٿي ، نئون خون ۽ نئون روح ڦوڪبو ويندو آهي ، ان جي انفرادي قوت ۾ اضافو ٿيندو ويندو آهي . ذريعا ۽ وسيلا ان لاءِ ارزان ٿيندا ويندا آهن ، شهرت ۽ نيڪ نامي ان جا پير چمڻ لڳندي آهي ۽ ”منزل“ مهينن بدران ڏينهن تي نظر ايندي آهي . اهي ڳالهيون بدقسمتيءَ سان اسان جي علمي ، ادبي ، سماجي ثقافتي ته ڇا پر سياسي تنظيمن ۽ جماعتن ۾ به ڏسڻ ۾ ڪو نه ٿيون اچن . ان جي برعڪس اسان جون وڏي کان وڏيون پارٽيون ۽ تنظيمون اندروني خلفشار ، ڄنڊا پٽ ۽ ڀڃ ڊاهه جو شڪار آهن . ڪيتريون تنظيمون پنهنجي صفن ۾ نون ساٿين شامل ڪرڻ بدران پنهنجن ئي پراڻن پر خلوص ۽ انيڪ قربانيون ڏيندڙ وفادار ساٿين کي تنظيم نيڪاليءَ جون تحريڪون هلائي رهيون آهن .اهو عمل اسان جي علمي ، ادبي ، ثقافتي ، سماجي ، مذهبي ۽ سياسي تنظيمن جو فطري ۽ وقت خواهه حالتن جي مطابق آهي . ڇو ته اسان جاگيردارانه ۽ وڏيرانه ماحول ۾ رهون ٿا . ان ڪري اسان مان هر ڪو پُرخلوص ۽ بي لوث ٿيڻ بدران ”وڏيري“ ، ”چوڌري“ ۽ هٿ ٺوڪئي ”معتبر “ ٿيڻ جي خفت ۾ هوندا آهيون . اسان جي نظرياتي تربيت نالي ماتر به ٿيل نه هوندي آهي ان ڪري اجتماعي ۽ قومي مفاد بدران ذاتي ۽ گروهي مفاد حاصل ڪرڻ لاءِ جاکوڙيندا آهيون . سچن ماڻهن کان صفائي حاصل ڪرڻ واري تحريڪ اڪثر ڪري انهن حالتن ۾ هلائي ويندي آهي ، جڏهن پُرخلوص ، وفادار ۽ مقصدن سان سچا ڪارڪن پنهنجي ئي تنظيم جي کڙپيل ، استحصالي سوچ رکندڙ ، شهرت ۽ دولت جي عاشق اڳواڻن جي هٿ ۾ کيڏي ، سندن آڱرين جي اشارن تي نچي ، تنظيم يا تحريڪ جي نالي اهڙيون ۽ ايتريون ته مثالي خدمتون سر انجام ڏيندا آهن ، جن مان نا عاقبت انديش اڳواڻن کي ته دولت ، شهرت ۽ عظمت جا انبار ملي ويندا آهن ، ليڪن قرباني ڏيندڙ پُرخلوص ڪارڪن شاندار عمارت جي پيڙهه جي پٿر جيان اوجهل يا گمنام ٿيندا ويندا آهن . ڪي اڳواڻ سندن گمناميءَ جو فائدو وٺي کين آسانيءَ سان عمل جي ميدان مان ڪڍي ڇڏيندا آهن ، ڪي اڳواڻ وري اهڙن ڪارڪنن کي ڪنهن اڻ وڻندڙ عمل ۾ ملوث ڪري سڄي ڄمار بليڪ ميل ڪندا آهن. پر جيڪو ڪارڪن پنهنجي سگهاري جذبي ۽ مقصد جي سچائيءَ ڪري بليڪ ميل ٿي نه ٿو سگهي ، يا هو پنهنجي صحيح يا غلط عمل کي تنظيم جو تابع ”اجتماعي عمل“ سمجهن ۽ ثابت ڪن ٿا ته پوءِ انهن خلاف اهڙيون تحريڪون هلايون وينديون آهن ، اڪثر ڪري ايشيا ۽ ٿرڊ ورلڊ ملڪن ۾ جي سياست ۾ اهڙي عمل کي پسنديده چال ڄاتو ويندو آهي .

    شهرت ، دولت ۽ حيثيت ۾ شريڪ نه ڪرڻ جي شوق ۾ يا ڪنمهن ڳجهي هٿ جي حرڪت ۾ اچڻ ڪري پنهنجن کي ائين ڇني ڌار ڪرڻ مان جيڪي منفي اثر ظاهر ٿين ٿا ، اهي تحريڪن ۽ تنظيمن جي تباهيءَ جو ڪارڻ ٿيندا آهن . ڇو ته هڪ طرف عوام اندروني خلفشار جي شڪار اهڙِين تنظيمن کي ڦڏئي ، مقصد کان خالي، دولت ۽ شهرت جو گهوارو ڄاڻي منهن موڙڻ لڳندو آهي ۽ ٻئي طرف ڇني ڌار ڪيل ڪارڪن نظرياتي پختگي نه هئڻ واري صورت ۾ پنهنجي زندگي انهيءَ تحريڪ يا تنظيم کي تباهه ڪرڻ لاءِ وقف ڪري ڇڏيندا آهن . جيئن ته اهي عمل جن ڪري کين پنهنجي تنظيمن ، تحريڪن ، ۽ جماعتن مان خارج ڪيو وڃي ٿو ، سي خارج ٿيل ڪارڪنن جا ”ذاتي عمل“ نه هوندا آهن ، بلڪ حقيقت ۾ ان پارٽيءَ جي حڪمن ۽ اصولن جا تابع ۽ سموري تنظيم جا ”گڏيل عمل“ هوندا آهن . ان ڪري اهي ماڻهو جيڪي پنهنجي ڪارڪنن کي بليڪ ميل ۽ بدنام ڪري پنهنجي تنظيمن مان خارج ڪن ٿا ، سي اڳتي هلي ساڳين عملن جي ڏوهه ۾ پنهنجن خواهه پراون هٿان بليڪ ميل ٿيندا رهن ٿا . اهڙي ريت اهڙن اڳواڻن تي ٻڌل هر ڪا تحريڪ ، تنظيم ۽ پارٽي پاڻ هرتو تباهه ۽ ختم ٿي وڃي ٿي .

     

    (ڪالم؛ فالو آن هلال پاڪستان تاريخ 18-05-1991)

     

     

  • 52. اچو ته قومي آسمان جي اوزون جا تهه بچايون

    اچو ته قومي آسمان جي اوزون جا تهه بچايون

     

    ڌرتيءَ جي آسمان سان ، جيڪا زيادتي ترقي يافته ملڪن ڪئي آهي، آسمان وارا ان جو بدلو اسان جي ايندڙ نسلن کان وٺندا. سائنسدانن جو چوڻ آهي ته ترقي يافته ملڪن جي ڪارخانن جي دونهين، ايٽمي تجربن ۽ بارود جي استعمال جي اثر، آلودگي ۽ ٻين سببن ڪري اوزون جو تهه ڦاٽي رهيو آهي.هي تهه صدين کان وٺي انسان ذات ۽ ٻئي مخلوق جي صحت ۽ سونهن جو ضامن پئي رهيو آهي. جيڪڏهن هن تهه کي وڌيڪ ڇهيو رسيو ته پوءِ انسان جي سونهن ۽ سندرتا ختم ٿي ويندي. اوزون جو تهه سج جي روشني ۽ گرمي کي روڪي نه سگهندو. پوءِ نتيجي ۾ ايتري گرمي وڌي ويندي جو هر ڪنهن کي يقين ٿي ويندو ته سج نيزي پاند اچي ويو آهي. پوءِ چمڙيءَ جون بيماريون عام ٿي وينديون. اڳتي هلي انسان جي چمڙي جانورن جي چمڙي کان به وڌيڪ سخت ۽ کهري ٿي پوندي. پوءِ ايندڙ دور جا شاعر اسان وانگر پنهنجي محبوب کي ڪنهن گل سان تشبيهه نه ڏيندا، ڪنهن جا ڳل بخمل جهڙا نرم محسوس نه ڪندا. ايندڙ دور جا شاعر وڏي فخر سان چوندا ته منهنجي محبوب جي کل اهڙي نرم آهي جهڙي ڪنهن هاٿي يا گڏهه جي . سچ پچ ته آڳرين تي ڳڻڻ جيترا ترقي يافته ملڪ انسان ذات جي وڏي انگ جي مستقبل ، سونهن ۽ خوشين جا ويري آهن. هو اوزون جي تهه کي نقصان پهچائي، جهڙوڪ اڀ کي ڦاڙي رهيا آهن ۽ باقي قومون ڦاٽي اڀ کي ٽوپا ڏيڻ ۾ مصروف آهن .

    بنهه اهڙيءَ ريت هر قوم جي هر ڪنهن شعبي ۾ به ڪي آڱرين تي ڳڻڻ جيترا فرد ٿيندا آهن، جيڪي وري پنهنجي قول ۽ فعل ، فطرت ۽ ذهنيت، شخصيت ۽ ڪردار سان قومي اتحاد، ترقي ۽ خوشحالي واري آسمان جي اوزون واري تهن کي نقصان رسائيندا رهندا آهن. سندن ڪرتوتن جو به قوم جي آئيندي تي اهڙو غلط اثر پئي ٿو، جهڙو آسمان واري اوزون واري تهه ڦاٽڻ سبب انسان تي اثر پوندو. هن ڪري قومي ڪردار واري چمڙي کي بيماريون وڪوڙي وينديون آهن، قدرن ۽ نظرن جي سونهن متاثر ٿيندي آهي ، سوچن مان سرهاڻ ختم ٿيڻ لڳندي آهي ۽ لوچن جي رفتار سست ٿي ويندي آهي.

    قومون جيڪڏهن اجتماعي طور تي غلط فيصلو ڪن ته ڊڄڻ جي ڳالهه ڪانهي ڇو ته تاريخ ٻڌائي ٿي ته اهڙين قومن ۾ جيڪڏهن پاڻ کي ۽ پنهنجي عمل کي درست ڪرڻ جي ساڃاهه آئي ته اهي مثالي قومون بڻجي وينديون . چيني قوم اجتماعي غلطي ڪري پاڻ کي آفيمي قوم بڻائي ڇڏيو. هيءَ قوم سالن جا سال انهيءَ آپگهاتي وهنوار ۾ مصروف رهي. تباهي جي انهيءَ عاشق قوم کي جڏهن عزت ڀرئي انداز سان زندهه رهڻ جو احساس ٿيو، تڏهن هر ڪو بدلجي ويو ۽ هر ڪا شئي بدلائي ڏيکاريائون.

    پر تاريخ جا ورق انهيءَ ڳالهه جي شاهدي ڏين ٿا ته جڏهن به ڪنهن قوم جي مختلف شعبن ۾ ڪي آڱرين تي ڳڻڻ جيترا فرد ڪاريون رڍون بڻجي پيون ۽ پنهنجي غلط سوچ ۽ لوچ سان قومي آسمان جي اوزون واري تهه کي ڇهيو رسائڻ شروع ڪيو ته نتيجي ۾ قوم جواجتماعي سڌارو ناممڪن ٿي پيو.

    آسمان جو اوزون وارو تهه سج جي گرميءَ کي روڪي ٿو ۽ ڌرتيءَ تائين اوتري گرمي پهچائي ٿو جنهن جي ڌرتي ۽ ان تي پلجندڙ جيوت کي ضرورت ٿئي ٿي. اهڙي نموني ۾ آدرش، آدرشي شخصيتون، آدرشي اصولن، نظرين ۽ قدرن جا پرچاري قومي آسمان جي اوزون جي حيثيت رکن ٿا. جيڪڏهن ڪنهن قوم جي آدرش، آدرشي شخصيتن ۽ انهن جي مبلغن خلاف رڻ ٻرايو ويو ته ان قوم کي وقت ۽ حالتن واري سج جي گرمي کان ڪير به بچائي نه سگهندو ؟

    اسان پڻ بنهه اهڙين حالتن مان گذري رهيا آهيون. اسان جا آدرشي انسان، اسان جا آدرشي قدر، نظريا ۽ اصول، انهن جو پرچار ڪندڙ علم ڌڻي ۽ قلم ڌڻي۽ انهن جا مرڪز يعنيٰ ادارا هاڻي اوزون جي تهه وانگر تباهه ڪيا پيا وڃن. اهو ڪو سموري قوم جو گڏيل فيصلو ڪونهي. انهن کي تباهه ڪندڙ ڪا آسماني مخلوق به ڪانهي، نه وري ڪو ڌاري ۽ دشمن قوم جي اها سازش آهي. پر آڱرين تي ڳڻڻ جيترن هٿ ٺوڪين قومي هڏ ڏوکين، نام نهاد ڏات ڌڻين ۽ مفاد پرست نقلي باشعورن جو ڪم آهي.اهي ياجوج ماجوج جيان اسان جي قومي آسمان جي اوزون واري تهه کي چٽي رهيا آهن. اهي اسان جي آدرشن جا دشمن، مدبرن جا منڪر، ادارن جا ويري ۽ اديبن خواهه شاعرن جا مخالف آهن.

    اديبن جي مخالفت کان ڪير ٿو ڪنهن کي روڪي؟ اديب ۽ شاعر واري جا ڪوٽ بڻجي ۽ حالتن جي تيز رفتار درياهه کان جيڪڏهن پنهنجو پاڻ ، قوم ۽ قومي قدر بچائي نه سگهن ته پوءِ واريءَ جا اهڙا ڪوٽ ڪهڙي ڪم جا؟ قوم کي اعتماد ۾ وٺي، بلڪ قوم کي ساڻ کڻي انهن خلاف ”اجتماعي تحريڪ“ هلائڻ وقت جي ضرورت بڻجي پوندي . اهڙي نموني سان ادارا جڏهن الله کي پيارا ٿي وڃن يا ڪيا وڃن ته انهن خلاف به اهڙي طريقه ڪار سان تحريڪ هلائي سگهجي ٿي. پر جڏهن ذاتي ۽ گروهي مفادن کي آڏو رکي ڪنهن اداري ، آدرشي اصولن يا شخصيت خلاف تحريڪ هلي ته ان کي اسرڻ کان اڳ وائکو ڪيو وڃي ٻئي صورت ۾ اهڙي تحريڪ اسان جي قومي آسمان واري اوزون جي تهه کي ڇهيو رسائيندي .

    اسان جي سچن ڏات ڌڻين کي ڪوئي ڌاريو لٺ ۽ چٺ سان جهڪائي نه سگهيو .کين ڪنهن عهدي ۽ رتبي جي پنجوڙ به ڪو نه ڦاسايو . هنن ڪنهن کان ڪجهه ورتو به ڪو نه ، ان جي برعڪس قوم کي ڏنو . هنن پنهنجي حياتي جي خوشين، ذريعن ۽ وسيلن جي ميڙي چونڊي قوم کي واپس ڏني. انهن خلاف ڪڏهن ڪڏهن عوام دشمن قوتون نقلي دانشورن کي ئي ڪم آڻي اسان جي ڏات ۽ ڏاهپ ، فڪر ۽ فلسفي واري اوزون جي تهه کي نقصان ڏيڻ جي ڪوشش ڪئي ويندي آهي .

    اهڙي ريت آدرشن ، ادارن ، نظرين ۽ قدرن خلاف جيڪا تحريڪ هلي ته پاڻ کي ڏسڻ گهرجي ته ، اها اجتماعي نوعيت ۽ قومي مفادن وٽان آهي يا انهن ياجوجن ماجوجن جي جي هلايل تحريڪ آهي جن کي قوم دشمن ۽ عوام دشمن قوتن اهڙي هُشي ڏني آهي. ڇا اهو ممڪن نه آهي ته اسان جا اهي آڱرين تي ڳڻڻ جيترا فرد قومي آسمان واري اوزون جي تهه کي ايئن ڇيهي رسائڻ بدران قومي جرڳا سڏائي ادارن ۽ فردن خلاف ڪيس هلائن ۽ احتساب جون روايتون قائم ڪن ؟

     

     

    (ڪالم ”ڌرتي – ڌرتتي“، روزنامه ”جاڳو“ ڪراچي ،

    تاريخ : 12.07.1994)