ڀڄن ولاس ڀاڱون ٻيو ڀڄن داس پريم پرڪاشي
{aridoc engine=”pdfjs” width=”570″ height=”600″ }images/Doc/NEW/ڀڄن_ولاس_ڀاڱون_ٻيو_ڀڄن_داس_پريم_پرڪاشي_صاف.pdf{/aridoc}
Author: admin
-
ٻال گيتا ۽ انگن جي استعمال اتمچند گنگارام 1946
ٻال گيتا ۽ انگن جي استعمال اتمچند گنگارام 1946
{aridoc engine=”pdfjs” width=”570″ height=”600″ }images/Doc/NEW/ٻال_گيتا_۽_انگن_جي_استعمال_اتمچند_گنگارام_1946_صاف.pdf{/aridoc}
-
سنڌ مشن’ جي عنوان سان بابا سائينءَ جي اهم تاريخي تحقيق
متاز علي پٺاڻ.” ‘سنڌ مشن’ جي عنوان سان بابا سائينءَ جي اهم تاريخي تحقيق”.
مان پنھنجي والد تي جيترو بہ فخر ڪريان, اوترو گهٽ آھي. ڇو تہ بابا سائين علمي, قلمي ۽ تحقيقي حوالي سان سنڌ جو هڪ سچو عاشق آھي. باباسائين ٽالپورن جي دور کان وٺي اڄوڪي دور تائين سنڌ جي سياست, علم ادب, ثقافت, تعليم, تجارت ۽ سماج بابت جيڪو مواد گڏ ڪيو آھي ۽ عالمانہ انداز سان ترتيب ڏئي رکيو آھي, ان جو مثال ڪوبہ فرد يا ادارو پيش ڪري نہ ٿو سگهي.جيتوڻيڪ اڄ ڪلھہ منھنجو گهڻو وقت گل حيات جي عمارت اڏائڻ ۾ گذري ٿو, پر وقت ڪڍي ڀريون ٻڌل بابا سائينءَ جي نوٽس جي صفائي بہ ڪندو آهيان. اڄ انگريزيءَ ۾ لکيل بابا سائينءَ جو “سنڌ مشن” جي عنوان سان هڪ مسودو نظر مان گذريو. اهي ڪمپوز ٿيل 54 صفحا آھن. انھيءَ مسودي ۾ فرنگي سفارتڪارن ۽ جاسوسن سنڌ ۾ نوس نوس ڪري, پنهنجيءَ سرڪار کي 24 نومبر 1831 کان 13 آگسٽ 1843 تائين جيڪي خبرون پهچايون, انهن جو اختصار سان اهي ڳالهيون ڪيون/لکيون آھن.آئون اهو سڄو مسودو تہ هتي شيئر نہ ڪو ڪري سگهان, پر ان مان ٿورا مثال هتي ڏيان ٿو. باباسائينءَ جيڪو واقعو بيان ڪيو آھي يا ڳالھ ڪئي آھي, ان جو حوالو پڻ ڏنو اٿس. انگريزيءَ ۾ لکڻ جو ڪارڻ اهو هئس تہ اڄ جي سنڌي ماڻھوءَ کي تاريخ پڙھڻ سان ڪا خاص دلچسپي ڪانهي. بابا جي روز شيئر ٿيندڙ “سنڌ جي واقعاتي تاريخ” بہ انٽرنيٽ تي موجود سڀ دوست ڪونہ پڙھندا آھن. ان ڪري بابا مناسب ڄاتو تہ سنڌ جو ڪيس دنيا جي ڪورٽ ۾ ئي پيش ڪرڻ لاءِ انگريزيءَ ۾ ئي لکڻو پئي ٿو. مان اڪثر ڪري بابا جي انگريزي نوٽس جو ترجمو ڪندو آھيان. پر اڄ گل حيات جي اڏاوتي ڪم جي نگراني ڪرڻ واري ڪم ۾ مصروف هجڻ ڪري, بابا جي نوٽس جو سنڌيءَ ۾ ترجمو نہ ٿو ڪيان ۽ سندس مسودي مان اقتباس ڏيان ٿو:Sind Mission.Letter, dated 24th November 1831, from Captain Sir C. Malcolm, Superintendent of Navy, to Earl of Clare, President and Governor in Council, informing him as to the time the Sind Mission, under Colonel Pottenger would take to reach Mandvi ; letter from Mr. C. Morris, Chief Secretary to Government of Bombay to Captain Sir C. Malcolm in reply to the above letter; letter No. 1789, dated 28th November 1831, from Government of Bombay to Envoy in Sind informing him that an advance of Rs. 15,000 had been made in his favour on account of the mission to Sind; (Year, 1832 Department. Political… File No, 300 Page (1-3) &) (Year 1832 Department Political… 300 Page (5) &)Letter from Governor in Council to His Highness Nawab Bahawalkhan, Daood Potra, Chief of Bahawalpore, making a Present of certain valuable articles to him for showing kind attentions and hospitality to Lieutenant Burns while on his journey to Lahore ; (Year, 1832 …Department, Political …File No, 300 Page (9-10) & )Letter No. 256, dated 20th November 1831, from Political Superintendent, Cutch to Government of Bombay relating to the pursuit after free-booters ( Soda Jagatsing of Nagar Parkar and Soda Poonjaji of Vera- veer ) by Sindian troops under Nawab Ghulam Shah Laghari, Chief of Saimkote.(Year, 1832 …Department, Political …File No, 300 Page (22-24) &)Letter, dated December 1831, from Government of India to Colonel Pottenger forwarding him a copy of a letter written under order of Governor-General to Political Assistant at Ludhiana, and of one to the address of Maharajah Ranjeetsing, Ruler of Lahore, relating to Colonel Potenger’s Mission to the courts of Ameers in Sind in connection with improvement of means of intercourse between His Highness’s territories and those of British Government by the route of Indus; (Year, 1832 …Department, Political …File No, 300 Page (47-54) &)Letter No. 43, dated 9th January 1832, from Government of Bombay to Colonel Pottenger acknowledging receipt of his Progress report relating to the mission to the Ameers of Sind and sanctioning grant of Presents to the Agent of His Highness Meer Murad Ali Khan of Sind; (Year, 1832 … Department, Political … File No, 300 (71-72) & )Letter, dated 12th January 1832, from Government of India to Colonel Pottenger approving of the emissary of Meer Naseer Khan and of the course proposed to be followed in continuing his journey to Hyderabad;( Year, 1832 … Department, Political … File No, 300 (73-83) &)Letter, dated 19th January 1832, from Colonel Pottenger to Government of India informing how he was received by the ‘Mahenandaes’ of Meer Murad Ali Khan, that his baggage was detained at the mouth of Indus and that he remonstrated with the ‘Mahemandars’ of Meer Alimurad Khan against the unfriendly act on the part of the Meer; (Year, 1832 … Department, Political … File No, 301 (26-35) &)Letter No. 2, dated 21st January 1832, from Government of Bombay directing Colonel Pottenger to act in accordance with sentiments expressed in extract paragraphs 5 to 8 of the dispatch from the Governor-General. (Year, 1832 … Department, Political … File No, 301 (87-89) &)Letter No. 40, dated 21st January 1832, from Colonel Pottenger to Government of India stating that Syed Zainuddin discussed with him the claims of several rival candidates to the musnud of Sind Government after to the death of Meer Muradali Khan; (Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 301 (41-51) &)Letter from Government of India to Colonel Pottenger acknowledging receipt of a letter and it translation from Meer Murad Ali Khan expressing His Highness’s friendly wishes and intentions towards His Lordship;(Year, 1832 … Department, Political … File No, 301 (41-51)&)Letter, dated 25th January 1832, from Government of India to Colonel Pottenger stating that the accounts of the Sind Mission will ultimately be passed by Supreme Government, but as the Bombay Government were connected with the Mission it would be convenient that they should pass in the first instance through that Government;(Year, 1832 … Department, Political … File No, 300(93-94)&)Letter, dated 26th January 1832, from Government of India to Colonel Pottenger acknowledging receipt of his letter of 8th idem and expressing-(i) His Lordship’s approval of the instructions issued to Dr. Del Hoste to avail himself of the opportunities afforded by the Mission to extend acquaintance with the Geography of Sind;(ii) Enjoining great caution to avoid incurring any imputation of converting the Mission into an expedition for the purpose of exploring the routes and military resources of the country.(Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 300(95-96) &)Letter, dated 15th February 1832, from Government of India in reply to Colonel Pottenger’s letter No. 38, dated 21st January 1832, expressing approval of his conduct in the intercourse he had with Mehmandars; (Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 300(117-118) &)Letter No. 43, dated 31st January 1832, from Colonel Pottenger to Government of India reporting the following proceedings with the Government of Sind with effect from the date of his arrival in Sind :-(a) Suspicions raised in the mind of Meer Muradali owing to the deputation of Colonel Pottenger to Khairpur and obstruction put by the Ameer in the Colonel Pottenger’s design to proceed to Khairpur;(b) Reception of Colonel Pottenger and his associates by Meer Muradali Khan;(c) Interview of Colonel Pottenger with the Ameer.(d) Draft treaty consisting of nine articles-Discussions of-with Munshi Khushiram. (Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 301 (52-103) &)Letters No. 46 and 46-B of 3rd February 1832 and 5th February 1832, respectively, from Colonel Pottenger to Government of India informing that Meer Muradali had permitted him to proceed to Khairpur had permitted him to proceed to Khairpur and that before leaving Hyderabad he had sent an outline of treaty to Meer Muradali to calm his suspicions and asking for further instructions;( Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 301 (147-175) (178-190) &)Letter No. 53, dated 11th February 1832, from Colonel Pottenger to Government of India informing:-(a) That Meer Muradali accepted the Presents sent by His Lordship;(b) That he had another interview with Meer Muradali Khan;(e) That owing to certain disturbances at Khairpur his departure had been postponed to that place at the expressed desire of the Meer; (Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 301 (190-215) &)Letter, dated 17th February 1832, from Government of India in reply to Colonel Pottenger’s letter No. 40, dated 21st January 1832, approving of the manner in which he discussed the question of succession and the caution maintained by him, and giving future instructions in connection with the matter; Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 301 (119-120) &)Letter, dated from February 1832, from Government of India forwarding, for information, to Colonel Pottenger copies of-(I) A letter from Maharajah Ranjeetsing respecting the navigation of the River Indus and by him in explanation;(2) A letter from Maharajah Ranjistsing in reply;(3) Letter from Government of India in reply to the above. (Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 301 (201-207) &)Letter, dated February 1832, from Government of India to Colonel Pottenger acknowledging receipt of Colonel Pottenger’s letter of 31st January 1832 and approving of his conduct in the difficult and troublesome discussions with Ruler of Hyderabad and his officers;(Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 300(161-163) &)Letter No. 56 of Colonel Pottenger appointing Dr. Delhoste to proceed to Khairpur and giving him instructions for guidance. ;( Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 301(249-290) &)Letter No. 57, dated 22nd February 1832, from Colonel Pottenger to Government of India reporting the following further proceedings at the Court of Meer Muradali:-(I) Message from Meer Muradali Khan desiring Colonel Pottenger to quit Hyderabad at once and proceed to Khairpur;(2) Memorandum from Colonel Potenger to Meer Muradali stating that he was ready to act agreeably to his advice and that he was waiting for reply from Meer Rustomkhan;(3) Deputation of Ahmedkhan and Bakshali to accompany Colonel Pottenger and his party to Khairpur;(4) March of Kharaksing to Dera Gazikhan and preparations made by Ameers of Hyderabad to meet him on the Sind Frontier;(5) Message from Meer Muradalikhan desiring Colonel Pottenger to return to Cutch if such a contingency arose and informing that he would write a letter to His Highness Governor-General explaining him the reason for dismissing the Mission;(6) Memorandum from Colonel Potenger to the Meer making some suggestions for establishing certain degree of political influence, without which no treaty would be found effectual.(7) Letter from Colonel Pottenger to Meer Murad Ali Khan informing that he had decided to send one of the gentlemen of his suite (Dr. Delhoste) to Khairpur ;unfriendly attitude adopted by the officers and difficulties thrown in the way of Colonel Pottenger’s access to Khairpur by the Meer and Colonel Pottenger’s protest. (Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 301(249-290) &)Letters, dated 29th February 1832, and 2nd March 1832, from Dr. Delhoste, attached to the Mission to Colonel Pottenger, relating to his reception at the Khairpur Durbar. ; (Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 300(167-181) &)Letter No. 71 of March 1832 from Government of Bombay to Colonel Pottenger reporting depredations committed by the Free-booter Pittoojee Waghela and requesting that it should be brought to the notice of the Ameers, if so desired. (Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 300(188) &)Letter, dated 17th March 1832, from Government of India (I) approving, with certain modifications of the draft treaty negotiated with Meer Muradali and giving further instructions; (2) forwarding a letter to the address of Meer Muradali Khan, assuring His Highness that British Government had no desire to covet his possessions (i.e. Shikarpur) and that integrity of Sind dominions will ever be respected. (Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 300(209-211) &)Letter, dated 17th March 1832, from Government of India to Colonel Pottenger, conveying His Excellency the Governor General’s approbation of the prudent and conciliatory course of proceedings which he (Colonel-Pottenger) adhered throughout the course of his negotiations and furnishing further instructions. (Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 300(213-218) &)Letter No.59, dated 19th March 1832, from Acting Resident at Bhooj forwarding copies of correspondence relating to complaint of one Sador Rahbaree of Palanpur against an outrage committed by certain Khosas of Islamkote and (2) of a letter to the address of Ameers of Sind for redress of grievances. (Year, 1832-33 … Department, Political … File No, 300(268-270) &) -
Government Reports about Hur Activities
” Government Reports about Hur Activities”
Gul Hayat Institute has done wonderful work for the bahamas preservation and protection of the Source-Material on Sindh History. As for as the Hur Movement is concerned, my father has collected every activity of Hurs during British Period. Soon after separation of Sindh, the Governors were appointed to head and supervise the Province. They used to to updated the Viceroy of India about Sindh situation. Here is from their Secret Reports, about Hur Activities of two months- March and April 1942. They wrote as under:The measures taken to put an end to the outrages being committed by the followers of the Pir Pagaro have not yet had any marked effect and crimes continue to be committed in spite of the numbers of police in the affected areas and the vigorous patrolling being carried on. On the 1st instant, a dacoity occurred in the Hyderabad District in which one person was killed and two injured and property Stolen. One Hur has been arrested in connection with this dacoity. On the 3rd night, a party of 10 to 15 dacoits raided the village of Kamil Laghari in Nawabshah District in spite of the fact that an armed Police post of 1 Head Constable and 5 Constables was stationed there. The post, which seems to have been badly located, apparently allowed itself to be taken by surprise and was overwhelmed by the dacoits. Two policemen were killed and two seriously injured. The dacoits killed in addition a Hindu resident of the village and then made off with 5 police muskets, 3 bayonets, 100 rounds of ammunition, 2 shotguns and 61 cartridges and other property. Further dacoities took place on the night of the 8the and 11th resulting in the death of two persons and the inflictions of injury on 4 others together with loss of property. On the 11th also the trouble spread to the Sukkur District and a part of 14 or 15 persons said to be in search of on Moulvi Abdul Ghani, who in 1938 had held a meeting condemning the practices of the Pir Pagaro, hindered 5 Muslims in a Masjid and 2 others in the street of a small village near Pir jo Goth, the former residence of the Pir, Again on the 12th another dacoity occurred in the Nawabshah District in which 2 men were injured and property was stolen And added to these offences there have been further instances of damage or attempts to damage railway property 3 cases in which telegraph wire have been cut and the poles damaged.The Situation is undoubtedly serious as the people in the affected areas are reported to be in a complete state of panic but with the whole of the country side unwilling through fear to give the Police any assistance whatsoever the tracing and apprehension of eh ascending Hurs who are believed to be responsible for the crimes is a matter or great difficulty. So far about 22 arrested have been made and it is hoped that this will prove to be first step towards breaking up the gangs. In order to encourage the police and to raise the morale of the local population the District Commander has arranged for demonstration marches of infantry in mechanized transport in the two districts. There is no doubt however, that very special measure must be employed and it is for this reason that the issue of a special ordinance has advocated.[No. P.25 H(S)/42, HOME DEPARTMENT (SPECIAL), SIND Secretariat, Karachi, Report for the First half of February 1942, 19th March, 1942.]There has been a further deterioration in the situation in the Nawabshah and Thar Parkar Districts where the outrages committed by the Hur adherents of the Pir Pagaro have increased in number in spite of the fact that 7 Police officers an 454 other ranks of the Police over and above the normal strength of these districts have been on continuous duty in the affected areas, carrying out the most vigorous patrolling and investigation Dacoities with murder continue and the causality list for the past three months (December, 10 killed and 3 wounded; January , 5 killed and 11 wounded; February, 26 killed and 23 wounded) shows that the measures so far employed which have included demonstration marched by troops in mechanized transport are not proving effective. Thar is no doubt that extra ordinary measures are called for, the press of the ordinary law are of no avail. In view of the difficulties which have been raised in connection with promulgation of an Ordinance, Legislation is being resorted to but there is no doubt that measure which might have been effective two months ago will now be little use. It now seems probable that the extensive as of troops will be necessary.[No. P.25 H(S)/42, HOME DEPARTMENT (SPECIAL), SIND Secretariat, Karachi, Report for the Second half of February 1942, 5th March, 1942.]The criminal activities of the Hurs continue and there is no doubt, as I have personally explained in my recent visit to Dehli, that the outbreak will not be put down without the extensive use of military forces. There is little to add to the note I left with you except to say that the G. O.C of the western District is now in Karachi investigating the possibilities of such action. The latest serious outrage was the recent murder of the chief officer of the Khairpur State Police at Kenwari in the State. On receipt of the news all possible assistance was sent and arrangements were made in Dehli for the dispatch of Crown Representative Police Forces.[No. P.25 H(S)/42, HOME DEPARTMENT (SPECIAL), SIND Secretariat, Karachi, Report for the First half of March 1942, 20th March, 1942.]Outrages by the Hur Followers of the Pir Pagaro continue and fourteen crimes involving robbery dacoity, incendiaries and murder were committed by them during the fortnight under review resulting in the death of thirteen persons and in injury to twelve others. There was an attack on Bhitshah Railway Station in the Hyderabad District, some damage was done and Rs 105/- stolen and there have also been three cases of the cutting of telegraph wires. The most serious incidents was an attack by some fifteen Hurs, reported to have come from Bahwalpur State, on the village of a rival Pir, the Pir of Bharchundi in the Sukkur District. During the attack nine inhabitants of the village were killed and five injured. Causalities among the Hurs are reported to be six killed and two injured. Special steps are being taken to protect the village as further attack on it is expected.As we had failed to secure assent to the promulgation of an ordinance to assist in dealing with the problem, a Hur Outrage Suppression Bill was passed in a secret session of the Legislative Assembly. The Bill is awaiting the assent of the Governor-General.Government have now appointed an experienced I.C.S officers as Additional District Magistrate with an additional District Superintendent of Police in the three affected talukas of Thar Parkar and Nawabshah Districts and he will be in complete charge of that area. His first task will be to assess the position, for this he is being accompanied by a field officer from the regiment stationed at Hyderabad, and to submit his recommendations for operations against the Hurs and their strongholds. That his recommendations will involve the extensive use of troops is certain and the real question at issue will be whether the troops will be able to give sufficient help while acting in aid of the civil power or whether the promulgation of martial law will be found necessary. As far as information ‘goes at present, the odds are on martial law being inevitable. [No. P.25 H(S)/42, HOME DEPARTMENT (SPECIAL), SIND Secretariat, Karachi, Report for the Second half of March 1942, 4th April, 1942.]The Hur trouble continues and thirty three crimes of murder, robbery and dacoity were committed by the Pir’s followers during the fortnight. Fourteen deaths and twenty-one cases of injury resulted. The Special Additional Magistrate has taken charge as a preliminary has carried out a reconnaissance march through the Makhi Dhand reported to be the chief stronghold of the ringleaders of the revolt. An early report from his is expected but meanwhile, on his recommendation, over 700 Hurs have been arrested and confined to jail in order to clear the countryside of abettors sympathizers. Until his report is received, the general plan of campaign cannot be settled and our efforts are at present concentrated on strengthening our Police and in securing outside assistance. His Excellency the Viceroy and Governor-General has given his assent to the Hur Outrage Suppression Bill.[No. P.25 H(S)/42, HOME DEPARTMENT (SPECIAL), SIND Secretariat, Karachi, Report for the First half of April 1942, 18th April, 1942.]The Hurs still hold the centre of the stage. Eighteen crimes of violence have occurred during the period under report resulting in 6 deaths and 5 cases of injury. There have also been instance of the breaching of canals and of the burning of crops. The securing of firearms is one of the main motives for many of the Hur raids and there is no question that the possession of a firearm is a positive danger in a vest number of cases. The police forces at the disposal of the Special Additional District Magistrate have now been reinforced by 6 platoons of the North-West Frontier Province Constabulary and by 2 platoons of Zhob Militia and further assistance has been promised from the Punjab. Thus strengthened, the District Magistrate is now pursuing a policy of clearing up the open areas of the affected talukas combined with rounding up operations in the Makhi Dhand. As a further preliminary to more intensive action, the Pir’s bungalow at Garang was raided in the early morning of the 30th April and the Pir’s Family removed there from and brought to Karachi. This was done as the presence of the family in the heart of the Hur country was considered to provide a stimulate to the criminal activities of the Hurs which it was necessary to remove. The raid on the bungalow was without incident and care was taken to have a lady present to deal with the lady members of the family as they are purdah. Wide publicity was given to the nature of this arrangement by means of the issue of a Press Note. The bungalow is being searched prior to its complete destruction which it is hoped will be a step towards the eradication of the Pir’s influence. Government are now considering the further disposal of the family.[No. P.25 H(S)/42, HOME DEPARTMENT (SPECIAL), SIND Secretariat, Karachi, Report for the Second half of April 1942, 5th May, 1942.]The “Hur” situation has very definitely worsened during the fortnight and the following crimes have been committed by the Pir’s “murids’ since my last report:-Thirty-four crimes involving dacoity and murder (including two derailments of trains) in which 33 persons have been killed and 44 injured. Of these, 24 persons were killed and 27 injured in the derailment of the Karachi-Lahore Mail on the night of the 16th instant and in the looting and murdering carried on by the Hurs after the train had been put out of action. Among the injured were 7 Europeans.Six offences against railway property (including the two derailment on the North-Western Railway), one attack on a railway station on the Jodhpur Railway in which an Assistant Station Master was murdered and two cases of telegraph wire cutting. -
IDEALS ARE JUST LIKE ORDINORY MEN AND HEROS ARE ALSO HUMAN-BEINGS.
[IDEALS ARE JUST LIKE ORDINORY MEN AND HEROS ARE ALSO HUMAN-BEINGS. FOLLOWTHEM, BUT NOT WORSHIP AND ACCEPT THEM AS SOPPER NATURAL. LET US REMEMBERSHAHEED ALLAH BUX ] By. DUR DUR MUHAMMAD PATHAN.
We are moving fast toward ideological slavery and are loudlycrying for all kinds of sovereignty. What a contrast we are facing andbelieving! When our Role-Model is alive, we are not ready to spare him/her. Wehonour him/her with all kind of sorrows and longings.We refuse to accept andrespect him/her. When he/she is dead, he/she becomes our Hero/Heroine. We stillavoid to follow their teaching and own their philosopy, but start worshipingthem. It is also our hypocracy. We use their historical status so as eran ourown name and fame. We try to prove our attachment with them. Whereas everyHero/Heroine is an everlasting Ideal. Though, they are not ‘common men’, butthey are an ordinory like we people. Only their dedication, sincerity anddevotion make the difference between them and we people. They must be treatedas human-beings, but not supper-natural. Because such a type of approach willgive the impression that we can not play our role like them and we can not getstatus in history as they got. Therefore, let us not block ways and aspiration.Let us give the message to young generation that our Hero/Heroine left the taskunfinshed and fathers of our future have to complete it. We have made ourIdeals worship-worthy. Therefore, Makhdoom Bilawal and Shah Inayat Shaheed,Zulfqar Ali Bhutto andBenazir, Allah Bux Soomro and G.M.Syed all have been made Pirs and Saints, butnot philosophers of their own ideology. We have as rejected their philosphy andaccepted their religious/spiritual position. Now, they are to help us not inideological matters, but they are dead so as to help us and recommend our casesbefore Allah. Whereas, they all were human-beings like we people, but theyplayed vital and ideal role in their respective field. They were notSupper-Natural. They also did good and some times bad. They also commitedmistakes as they were human-beings.
It is irony of fate that we are not told truth and so manything are being hidden from us. Therefore we have no option, but to believe andaccept them as supper-natural. For example, Shaheed Allah Bux Soomro was anIdeal. He was great freedom fighter, he believed in Hindu-Muslim unity. But,they are some aspects of his political performance, those left negative impacton our future politics.
It is said, and I also believe that Sindh Muslim Leaguewanted to get rid of him and it launched terrible movement for the restorationof Masjid Manzilgah of Sukkur. Not only more than 150 people were killed withmajorty of Hindus, but it made upper Sindh, specially Sukkur District(Including area now known as Rohri, Ghotki, Jarwar & Pano Aqil) astense-full area for ever.
Sindh Muslim League took the case of Masjid Manzilgah in thelast quarter of 1938, when Sindh Provincial Conference was held at Karachi withQuaid-i-Azam in chair. But, what happened in the first quarter of 1938? It isbig event and it was the beginning of the bad event. No other, but ShaheedAllah Bux was responsible to reincarnate the dead issue of Masjid Manzilgah. Itis on record that much before the separation of Sindh, when K.B.Shaheed AllahBux Soomro was a member of the Bombay Legislative Council, he contributed fromhis pocket for renovation of Masjid Manzilgah. On the 3rd March1938, eleven days after assuming office of the Premier of Sindh, K.B. Allah BuxSoomro recorded a minutes on the MasjidManzigah which is as follow:
“ In these days of democracy, it is necessary that both Hindus andMuslimans should be the studied endeavour of every democratic Government to aimat this achievement.
From a perusal of record, it was apparent that Muslmans can not claim as ofright to have these domed buildings as Mosques. But there is sufficientmaterial in these papers to show that buildings are of antiquarian interest andthey were built by the Musliman rulers of India, and contain inscriptions inArabic to which the Muslimans no doubt attach some sort of sancity………
This proves beyond doubt that the buildings were intended to be treated asWakf properties and therefore the Muslmans have right to their use. This facthas also been recognised by Government Officers before in allowing the Muslmansin erecting a Wall round the building.
The only question that now arises, therefore, is whether these buildingscan be used for any purpose other than as Mosques. For this I want to invite anauthoritative opinion from responsible Muhammadan theologists, who are wellversed in law of Shariat, and also from the Legal Adviser of the Government.”
In Minutes of dated 12th of April, Shaheed AllahBux writes that “the building is a Mosque’. On the same date he orders M.Ishaqan officer for inspection of the site and buildings and furnish report onArabic inscription. On 14th of April, orders are issued andExecutive Engineer, Mathrani is asked to inspect and determine the date of construction ofMehrab. Both reports were not sufficient to satisfy him, hence an other jointinspection committee is constituted. On 14th of April 1938,K.B.Soomro sent Moulana Muhammad Sadiq of Khada and Hakim Fatih MuhammadSehwani to visit the site. They are given Demi Official letter for the DistricyAdminstration to assist/help them in finding facts. Both Religious Scholars andleaders of Jamiat-ul-Ulema Sindh declared in public meeting at Sukkur thatBuilding is Mosque and they will request Premier to restore it to Muslims. All this prove that K.B.Allah Bux was dealingwith the issue with Subjectivty and personal interest. He was advised by the Maantof Sadh Bello and his friend D.B.Issarsing that do not reopen the matterbecause it will give rise to bitterness between two communities. Inspite ofthat, Shaheed Allah Bux remained determined to resolve the issue. In real, hewas the opener of the issue. Either it was his political mistake, or he wascommunalist Muslim in his heart and mind. He re-introduced the Burning Issueand Sindh Muslim League converted it into fire later on. All most all leadersof Sindh Muslim League and Shaheed Allah Bux including some Hindu politiciansare responsible for division of Sindh into Hindu and Muslim camps and theirmistakes gave birth to very ugly event in the history of Sindh.
-
انيتا شاھ لڪياري
انيتا شاھ لڪياريھن جھان مان لاڏاڻو ڪري وئي
انيتا شاھ جي زندگي جو مختصر خاڪوانيتا شاھ لڪياري، نوجوان اسڪالر، ليکڪا ۽ ڪالم نگار آهي. هوءَ 15 نومبر 1974ع تي حيدرآباد ۾ ڄائي. سندس وڏا اصل خدا آباد ضلعي دادوءَ جا آهن. سندس تعليم ايم.بي.اي (مارڪيٽنگ: 1998ع) ۽ ايم.اي (سوشيالاجي: 2002ع) آهي. ان کان سواءِ انسٽيٽيوٽ آف وومين اسٽڊيز لاهور مان پوسٽ گريجوئيٽ سرٽيفڪيٽ (2000ع) ۽ يونيورسٽي آف ميري لئنڊ ڪاليج پارڪ، آمريڪا مان هيوبرٽ همفيري فيلوشپ (07-2006ع) دوران عورت ۽ سياست، عورت ۽ ميڊيا، فلم ميڪنگ، ويب سائيٽ ڊولپمينٽ ۽ پراڊڪشن، ڪهاڻي ۽ تخليقي لکڻين جي موضوعن تي مختلف ڪورس ڪيل اٿس. سينٽر آف جينڊر اسٽڊيز اسٽريٿ ڪلائيڊ يونيورسٽي گلاسڪو (انگلنڊ) طرفان آڪٽوبر 2005ع کان جنوري 2006ع تائين مختلف موضوعن تي ڪرايل سيمينارن ۽ ڪانفرنسن ۾ ريسرچ اسڪالر طور شرڪت ڪيائين. ان کان سواءِ غيرت جي نالي تي سنڌ ۾ ٿيندڙ عورتن جي قتلام بابت مونوگراف به لکيل اٿس.هن لکڻ جي شروعات 1994ع کان روزاني ”ڪاوش“ ۾ ڪالمن ذريعي ڪئي. سندس لکڻين جا موضوع خاص طور تي سنڌ جي ڳوٺاڻي عورت جي حوالي سان سماجي ۽ معاشي ترقيءَ بابت آهن. هن سنڌيءَ ۾ 100 کن ڪالم لکيا آهن. انيتا شاهه 1997ع کان1999ع تائين بي.بي.سي انگلش لئنگئيج سينٽر حيدرآباد ۾ لئنگئيج ٽيچر طور پڙهايو آهي. 1998ع ۾ ايم.بي.اي ڪرڻ کان پوءِ ساڳئي انسٽيٽيوٽ ۾ (آڪٽوبر 1999ع کان جنوري 2000ع تائين) ريسرچ ايسوسيئيٽ ۽ انسٽرڪٽر رهي. ساڳئي سال انسٽيٽيوٽ آف ماڊرن سائنس اينڊ آرٽس حيدرآباد ۾ به انسٽرڪٽر رهي. ان بعد مختلف پرڏيهي يونيورسٽين ۽ ادارن ۾ تعليم حاصل ڪرڻ سان گڏ فيلوشپ حاصل ڪيائين. مارچ کان جون 2007ع تائين وائيس آف آمريڪا جي پروگرام”بيانڊ دي هيڊلائينز“ جي رپورٽر ۽پروڊيوسر به رهي.ڪمپيئر جي حيثيت ۾ سندس ڪي. ٽي. اين تان مختلف سياسي ۽ سماجي موضوعن تي 50 کان وڌيڪ ٽاڪ شو نشر ٿي چڪا آهن. پي. ٽي. ويءَ تي به ڪم ڪيو اٿس. روزاني ”ڪاوش“ اخبار ۾ ڪالم لکڻ جو سلسلو اڃا به جاري رکيو ھوهوءَ عورتن جي حقن لاءِ عملي طرح پاڻ پتوڙيندي رهي ـ سرڪاري نوڪريءَ دوران ثقافت کاتي ۾ سيڪشن آفيسر رهي.مئي 2001ع کان ڪجهه عرصي تائين سنڌ پبلڪ سروس ڪميشن جي ڊپٽي سيڪريٽري رهي. 2004ع ۾ CARE نالي سان هڪ غير سرڪاري سماجي تنظيم جو بنياد وڌائين، جنهن کي پوءِ 2006 ع ۾ ٽرسٽ فار رورل اپ لفٽ ، ڪلچر اينڊ انوائرمينٽ (TRUCE) جي نالي سان رجسٽر ڪرايائين، جنهن جي پاڻ باني ۽ چيف ايگزيڪيوٽو رھي . سندس تنظيم، يو. اين. ڊي. پي جي ننڍي گرانٽ واري پروگرام سان گڏجي، مٽياريءَ ۾ هڪ پراجيڪٽ هلائيندي رهي 2001ع ۾ عورتن جي مسئلن بابت ڀرپور نموني سان لکڻ تي کيس خيرالنساءَ جعفري ادبي اوارڊ ۽ خان محمد پنهور اوارڊ ملي چڪا آهن. هن وقت سنڌ گورنمينٽ ۾ ڊي. ڊي. او روينيو حيدرآباد طور (شهباز بلڊنگ حيدرآباد ۾) خدمتون سر انجام ڏئي رهي ھئي.پاڻ ڪجھ وقت کان الزائمر جي موذي مرض ۾ مبتلا ھئي ء عليل ھئي اڄ پنھنجي زندگي جي جنگ ھارائي ويئي ۽ مالڪ حقيقي سان وڃي ملي.(الله پاڪ پنجتن پاڪ جي محابي جنت الفردوس ۾ اعلي مقام عطا فرمائي آمين) -
-
LETTER TO THE VICEROY OF SINDH,THATPAVED WAY FOR HIS DISMISSAL AS THE PREMIER OF SINDH.
FULL TEXT OF ALLAH BAKHSH SOOMRO’S LETTER TO THE VICEROY OF SINDH,THATPAVED WAY FOR HIS DISMISSAL AS THE PREMIER OF SINDH.
[An unprecedented thing happened which brought out in astriking manner the real character of British policy. The Premier of Sindh,Mr.Allah Bakhsh Soomro, who had publicly protested against the Government’srepressive policy, is dismissed from his office by the SindhGovernor. The extraordinary reason given is that Mr.Allah Bakhsh no longerpossessed the Governor’s confidence and that he could not in consequencecontinue to hold office.
For the first time since the 1935 Act came into force, thisnew principle was applied that a Premier, though no motion of ‘no-confidence’had been passed against him in a Legislature, could be dismissed from office bythe Governor on the ground that he did not possess Governor’s confidence! Theonly offence of Allah Bakhsh, the Premier of Sindh was that, as a protestagainst Mr. Churchill’s statement, he renounced the honours which he hadreceived from the Government. The textof his leeter is shared here-with.-Dr.Dur Muhammad Pathan, Founder, Gul HayatInstitute]
“ I beg to inform your Excellency that I have decided torenounce both the honours I hold from the British Government as I feel I cannotconsistently with my views and convictions retain them any longer.
India has been struggling for her national freedom for along time past. Upon the outbreak of the present war it was hoped that under the very principles and ideology, indefence of which the Allies were waging a titanic conflict, India would be madefree and participate in the world struggle as a free country.Convinced as I amthat India has every to be free and that the people of India should haveconditions in which they could live in peace and harmony, the declaration andaction of the British Government have made. I clear that, instead of giving their co-operation tovarious Indian parties and communities in settling their differences and partingwith power to the people of land and allowing them to live happy in freedomand mould the destinies of their country according to their birthright, the policy of the British Government hasbeen to continue their imperialistic hold on India and persist in keeping herunder subjection, use the political and communal differences for propagandapurposes, and crush the national forces to serve their own imperialistic aimsand intentions.
The last speech delivered by Mr. Wiston Churchill in theHouse of Commons has caused the greatest disappointment to all men of goodwillwho wish to see rendered to India justice which is long due to her. As thathelpless pronouncement withholds such justice from India and adds to the volumeof evidence that Britain has no desire to give up her imperialistic hold onIndia, I feel I cannot retain the honours I hold from the British Governmentwhich in the circumstances that have arisen. I cannot but regard as tokens ofBrituish Imperialism.” (Source: ‘Source-Material on Allah Bakhsh Soomro’,compiled by Gul Hayat Institute).
-
سنڌ جا ڪي اداڪار
سنڌ جا ڪي اداڪار
] نوٽ: هيءَ 34 سال اڳ جي ڳالهه آهي، جڏهن مون ڊاڪٽر ڄيٺي لالواڻيءَ کي هيءُ خط لکيو هو. ان جي ڪاپي ته مون وٽ ڪا نه هئي، پر انڊيا جي ڊاڪٽر روشن جي مهرباني، جنهن اهو خط What’up ذريعي ڪن دوستن سان شيئر ڪيو ۽ مون کي به ان جو عڪس ڏياري موڪليو، جنهن کي ڪمپوز ڪري دوستن سان ونڊي رهيو آهيان. هيءُ خط 1982 ۾ لکيو هئم ۽ ان ۾ جيڪا معلومات ڏني اٿم، اها 1982 تائين سمجهي وڃي. ڊاڪٽر در محمد پٺاڻ[
ڪراچي
15.01.1982
پريتم ڀاءُ لالواڻي
اوهان جو خط پهتو. مهرباني. خط کي جڏهن ٻاهران ڏٺم ته سائين گنگارام سمراٽ جا هٿ اکر نظر آيا. سوچيم ته سندس ناراضپو جهڪو ٿيو آهي، جو خط لکيو اٿن. مون کي حڪم ڪيو هيائون ته ڏانهن ڪجهه ڪتاب موڪليان. آئون اهي ڪتاب موڪلي ڪونه سگهيو هئس.
اوهان لکيو آهي ته: “پهريون ڀيرو خط وسيلي مخاطب ٿي رهيو آهيان!” پر ادل، مان ته اوهان کي اڳ کان سڃاڻان ٿو. اوهان مون کان ٻه مهينا ۽ سترنهن ڏينهن وڏا آهيو. اوهان ڪنڊياري ۾ ڄاوا هئا ۽ آئون موهن جي دڙي لڳ ڳوٺ خير محمد آريجا ۾!! فرق رڳو هي آهي ته مون Ph.D ڪئي آهي ۽ اوهان M.B.B.S ڪري رهيا آهيو. آئون هتي آهيان ۽ اوهان احمد آباد ۾ آهيو. مون اوهان جو ذڪر پنهنجي اڻ ڇپيل ڪتاب “ايڊيٽر نامو” ۾ ڪيو آهي. تنهنجو ڪتاب “علي بابا گم” پڙهيو اٿم.
اهو پڙهي خوشي ٿي ته اوهان کي منهنجو ”اديون“ ۾ شايع ٿيل مضمون وڻيو. اوهان جي پسنديده وشيه تي هتي ڪو به ڪتاب شايع نه ٿيو آهي. البت ڊراما ڪيترائي شايع ٿيا آهن، آئون سٺا ڊراما تو ڏانهن موڪلي ڏيندس. باقي خطن وسيلي تو ڏانهن معلومات موڪلي ڏيندس، تون منهنجا مضمون پنهنجي ڪتاب ۾ کڻي ڏجانءِ. ناٽڪ منڊلين وارو مضمون تو وٽ آهي. هن سان گڏ “سنڌي اداڪار جو وچور” ڏياري موڪليان ٿو.
”سنڌي اداڪارن جو وچور“
سنڌي ناٽڪ جي تاريخ ۽ ترقيءَ بابت لکڻ وقت اداڪارن جي وجود ۽ اهميت کي ڪڏهن به نظرانداز نه ٿو ڪري سگهجي. حقيقت مڳڻ اداڪارن جو ذڪر ئي ڊرامي جي اڌ تاريخ آهي. سنڌي اداڪارن کي ٽن حصن ۾ ورهائي سگهجي ٿو: هڪڙا سنڌ جا اداڪار، ٻيا هند جا اداڪار ۽ ٽيان ورهاڱي کان اڳ جا اداڪار. انهن ٽنهي قسمن جي اداڪارن جي جيون چرترن ۽ ڪارنامن تي الڳ ڪتاب لکي سگهجي ٿو. انهيءَ ڪم کي تڏهن پورو ڪري سگهبو، جڏهن سنڌ يا هند ۾ ”ناٽڪ لاءِ تحقيقي اڪاڊمي“ قائم ڪئي وڃي. جنهن طرفان منظم نموني ناٽڪي اداڪارن سان رابطو قائم ڪري سندن احوال ڪٺو ڪيو وڃي.
هن هيٺ آئون سنڌ جي ناٽڪي اداڪارن جي نالن جو وچور ڏئي رهيو آهيان، ته جيئن مون کان پوءِ کوجنا ڪرڻ واري کي هڪ ئي هنڌ تي گهڻي کان گهڻا نالا ملي سگهن ۽ هو آسانيءَ سان ڪم ڪري سگهن.
الف: اقبال پروين، اقبال ترين، اسرار شام، ابراهيم پروانو، امداد ملڪ، ارشاد گل، اسماعيل انجم، اقبال انصاري، امير ناز، اڪبر آرزو، انور اقبال، آفتاب شاهه، آفتاب نبي، انور بلوچ، انوري بيگم، اشفاق صفي، ايوب سرحدي، احمد شريف، الطاف سومرو، ابو بلال، اختر ناز، احمد علي چانڊيو، انور شاهه، اي. آر. بلوچ، اياز لطيف، اسلم راهي، انور سولنگي، الله بچايو لغاري، آغا سليم، اعجاز ساريو، اعظم عباسي، اسد لڪياروي، اختري، اسلم تنيو.
ب: بدر حيدر، بملا، بينا،
ت: تهذيب جعفري، تاج ساريو.
پ: پروين اڪبر، پرنس مشتاق، پروين ناز، پرين بوبي، پريم راهي، پروين اقبال.
ج: جاويد ميمڻ، جاويد ناز، جاويد بلوچ، جاني بلوچ، جبار خليل، جڳديش ڪمار،
ح: حسينه عاليه، حيدر، حسن مستانه،
خ: خادم عباسي، خادم ابڙو، خان محمد جوڻيجو، خدا بخش،
چ: چڪوري، چندا ناز،
د: درل سوز، دوست محمد ساريو، دوست محمد ابڙو،
ذ: ذوالفقار پپو، ذوالفقار هيسباڻي،
ر: رابيله، رضيه ناز، روشن بخاري، رياض شيخ، رخسانه خانم، روشن عطا، راجا نور انور، راجو البيلو، روبيه، رفيق صديقي، رشيد خمار، رفيق مغل، رفيق ترين، روپ مالا.
ز: زاهد مرزا، زرينه بلوچ، زوار نقوي، زرينه گل،
س: ساجده گل، ساحر قريشي، ساوتري، سڪينه سمون، سلطان، س. گل، سعيده، سيد صالح محمد شاهه، ساقي، ساجده پروين، سليم کيڙو، س. مغل، سيما، سڪندر بلوچ، سڪندر سومرو،
ش: شهنشاهه عباس، شفيع محمد شاهه، شبير سيتائي، شبير بلوچ، شهناز، شهزاد گل، شهزادي، شفيق انصاري،
ص: صلاح الدين، صابر حسين،
ع: عمر ابڙو، علي گوهر، عبدالغني سولنگي، علڻ جانوري، عبدالخالق، عظيم کوکر، عبدالحڪيم کوسو، عاليه ناز، عصمت راشدي، عابد حيدري، عباس شاهه، عابد خان، عابد خان، عبدالحق ابڙو،
غ: غزاله رفيق، غلام رسول زنگيجو، غفار ڀٽي، غلام علي سومرو، غفار تبسم، غالب لطيف، گلشن آرا، گل حسن جانوري، غلام نبي شاهه، غوث عادل،
ڦ: ڦوٽو زرداري،
ف: فتح علي پنهور، فدا مير، فريد نواز،
ڪ: ڪنول، ڪرشن لعل، ڪليم،
ق: قربان جيلاني، قلندر بخش، قربان درس، قمر شهباز، قمر زمان شاهه.
گ: گل منير، گلاب گل، گل بانو، گلشن راهي، گ. ڏيپر، گيتا،
ل: لطيف منا، لائق کوسو، لطيف چارلي
م: ممتاز ڪنول، منير شاهين، محمد علي، مصطفيٰ بروهي، محڪم جوڻيجو، منصور جانوري، مدد وفا، مقصود مغل، مصطفيٰ شيخ، محمد عرس، محمود صديقي، محمد هاشم قريشي، محمد خان بروهي، مصطفيٰ قريشي، منظور قريشي، منصور راهي، مشتاق جسڪاڻي، منظور مراد، ممتاز ابڙو، ممتاز عباسي، محمود لاسي، مشتاق چنگيزي، مختيار کوسو، مشتاق مغل، ممتاز پنهور،
ن: نياز حسين، نواب سولنگي، نسرين اقبال، نعيم بلوچ، نيما، نواب اسلم، نذير سولنگي، نثار حسيني، نادر بلوچ، نبي بخش لاشاري، نور محمد لاشاري، نعيم سيلاني، نزهت عباسي، نذير بلوچ، نرگس،
و: وفا ڀٽي
ي: يار محمد شاهه، ياسمين بيبي، يوسف علي،
هه: هاشم شورو، هاشم قريشي، همايون گل، هاشم بلوچ.
مهرباني ڪري، اوهان پاڻ هنن کي ترتيب واري ڪري رکجو. هي وچور اوهان جي ڪتاب ۾ پوئتان ضميمي طور به ڏئي سگهجي ٿو. ٿي سگهيو ته آئون هر هڪ تي مضمون الڳ لکي موڪليندس. پر ان لاءِ وقت گهرجي، ڇو ته ساڻن ملڻ لاءِ وقت ڪڍڻو پوندو. هي وچور ڪجهه وقت اڳ پاڻ ٺاهيو هيم، جيڪو اوهان ڏي موڪليان پيو.
شري رام ڪرشن هيرانند آڏواڻي (راهي) منهنجا ڪي ڪتاب (اڻ ڇپيل) ۽ مضمون ايڏانهن کڻي آيو هو. جيڪڏهن ڪتاب ڇپجي نه ٿا سگهن ته کيس (بمبئي خط لکي) چوندا ته مون وارا مضمون ئي اتي شايع ڪرائي.
وڌيڪ خير
سائين گنگارام سمراٽ لاءِ نياز
ڊاڪٽر در محمد پٺاڻ
-
ایاز قادري
ایاز قادري
سنڌ جي مشهور ڪھاڻيڪار، شاعر، ليکڪ، صحافي ۽ تعليمي ماهر ڊاڪٽر پروفيسر اياز قادريءَ 19 جنوري 1927ع تي لاڙڪاڻي ۾ جنم ورتو، سندس والد فقير غلام سرور قادري به پنهنجي وقت جو سٺو شاعر هو، اياز قادريءَ هاءِ اسڪول لاڙڪاڻي مان مئٽرڪ ڪرڻ کان پوءِ ڪراچيءَ مان بي. اي آنرس، ايم. اي (فارسي)، ايم. اي (سنڌي) ۽ ايل ايل بي ڪئي، ان کان پوءِ هن علامہ غلام مصطفئ قاسمي جي نگراني ۾ (سنڌي غزل جي اوسر) جي عنوان سان ٿيسز لکي پي ايڇ ڊي ڪئي، ڪجهه عرصو ايس ايم ڪاليج ڪراچيءَ ۾ ليڪچرار رهيو، 1971ع ۾ ڪراچي يونيورسٽيءَ جي سنڌي شعبي جو پهريون چيئرمين مقرر ٿيو، ڪراچي يونيورسٽيءَ ۾ ئي قائم ٿيل ”شاھ لطيف چيئر“ جو باني ڊائريڪٽر رهيو، ان دوران پروفيسر سيد وقار رضويءَ جي سان ملي شاھ لطيف جي شاعريءَ جو نثري اردو ترجمو ڪيو، جيڪو پوءِ اڪادمي ادبيات چئن جلدن ۾ ڇپرايو، ڊاڪٽر اياز قادري جي شاعريءَ جو مجموعو ”زلف اياز” جي عنوان سان شايع ٿيل آهي، ڊاڪٽر اياز قادري ڪنهن دور ۾ ھڪ ھفتيوار اخبار “الحقیقت” به ڪڍي، ھو سنڌي ادبي سنگت جو مرڪزي سيڪريٽري جنرل ء جمعيت الشعراءِ سنڌ جو باني ميمبر رهيو، سندس ڪھاڻين جو مجموعو ”بِلو دادا“ پھريون دفعو 1956ع ۾ ڇپيو، جنھن جا پوء ڪيترائي ڇاپا اچي چڪا آهن، ھن مئڪسم گورڪيءَ جي مشهور ڪتاب آتم ڪهاڻي کي به سنڌي ٻوليءَ ۾ ترجمو ڪيو، سندس ٻين ڪتابن ۾ پرين جون ڪھاڻيون، مٽيءَ لڌو مان، عشقيہ داستان وغيره شامل آهن، ڊاڪٽر اياز قادريءَ 15 ڊسمبر 1997ع تي ھي جھان ڇڏيو.. -
-
ضیاء الدین ضیاء
ضیاء الدین ضیاء
سنڌ جي مشهور شاعر، ليکڪ، صحافي ضياءَ الدين ضياء 15 ڊسمبر 1910ع تي سنڌ جي ناليواري شاعر، ليکڪ، صحافي شمس الدين “بلبل” جي گهر ۾ ميهڙ ضلعي دادو ۾ جنم ورتو، ھن مسلم يونيورسٽي علي ڳڙهه مان ايم اي، ايل ايل بي ڪئي، ان کان پوءِ وڪالت شروع ڪيائين، ھن پنھنجي والد صاحب جي نقش قدم تي هلندي ننڍي ھوندي کان ئي لکڻ ۽ شاعري شروع ڪئي، ھن پنھنجي والد صاحب جي ياد ۾ “بزم بلبل” جي عنوان سان ادبي فورم جو بنياد وڌو، ھن مختلف نوڪريون ڪيون، سنڌ مدرسته الاسلام ۾ ليڪچرار رهيو، اسسٽنٽ پبلڪ پراسيڪيوٽر، ضلعي پبلڪ پراسيڪيوٽر رهيو، وڪالت ڪيائين، ھن شاعري ڪئي، ڪالم لکيا، مضمون، مقالا لکيا، سندس ڇپيل ڪتابن ۾ (تحفه ميهڙ، خطبه ضياءَ، ضياءُ القلندر، قرب قلندر) وغيره شامل آهن، هفتيوار اخبار “تنظيم عوام” جو باني ايڊيٽر، ماهوار “اديب سنڌ” جو ايڊيٽر رهيو، ھن 14 ڊسمبر 1966ع تي وفات ڪئي.. -